The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-07-2011, 12:24 AM   #26
bloodybigblock
Registered User
 
bloodybigblock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: hanceville alabama
Posts: 268
Re: 5.3 or 6.0 Conversion

Quote:
Originally Posted by SS Delux View Post
I am looking into doing a 5.3 or 6.0 conversion on my truck, what kind of gas mileage are you guys getting ? What is a good price for just a motor ? are high mileage motors a concern ?
i think the motor swap got popular by guys who make that extra step to try something different! they arent to expensive but if your gonna swap the u might as well go with a 6.0! i personally think computerized motors are to much of a problem. my 454 with turbo350 gets 14-18mpg and i turn over heavvyyy 22s! nothing like a good ol carb.
bloodybigblock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2011, 03:50 AM   #27
gchemist
BAD BOW-Silverado XST
 
gchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Senior Member from Austin, TX
Posts: 6,431
Re: 5.3 or 6.0 Conversion

Read about this 77 conversion to a 5.3: http://www.hotrodlane.cc/77chevytruck/77chevy.htm

The engines are dependable for thousands of miles.

I've raced plenty of late model 5.3's. Smoked everyone of them. ZZ4 has some torque. Now a 6.0 or 6.2 would run side by side with me, if not pull away with FI. You can convert either to carb. Look at www.summitracing.com or www.jegs.com for intakes and spark control systems.
__________________
Gerardo a.k.a. Mad Chemist
Silverado XST videos
gchemist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2011, 07:17 PM   #28
foamypirate
Registered User
 
foamypirate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pflugerville, TX
Posts: 594
Re: 5.3 or 6.0 Conversion

Quote:
Originally Posted by gchemist View Post
I've raced plenty of late model 5.3's. Smoked everyone of them. ZZ4 has some torque. Now a 6.0 or 6.2 would run side by side with me, if not pull away with FI.
Let's not forget that any modern truck weighs about 1,000 to 2,000 lbs more than our trucks do.

Power-to-weight is king. A 5.3 in square would outrun a 5.3 in a current truck, no doubt
foamypirate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2011, 01:54 PM   #29
coater
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Leesburg,Ga.
Posts: 359
Re: 5.3 or 6.0 Conversion

Is there a book or a complete article that explains in detail of what is needed and how its done? Very curious about this setup.
coater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2011, 03:07 PM   #30
D.FENS
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Huntsville AL
Posts: 284
Re: 5.3 or 6.0 Conversion

Quote:
Originally Posted by coater View Post
Is there a book or a complete article that explains in detail of what is needed and how its done? Very curious about this setup.
http://http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/forumdisplay.php?f=206

There is an LSx swap subforum here. Ton of good info. At least one book out on the subject, search amazon for it because I can't remember the title.

Freiburger @ Hot Rod mag did an LS6 swap into a '74 C10, and did a writeup on it.

http://http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/engine/hrdp_0906_1974_chevy_c10_build/viewall.html

Last edited by D.FENS; 08-08-2011 at 03:10 PM. Reason: Found article
D.FENS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2011, 04:41 AM   #31
arcticcattruck
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 9
Re: 5.3 or 6.0 Conversion

carbs suck!!!!!
arcticcattruck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2011, 07:48 AM   #32
BigBlocksRule
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 2,047
Re: 5.3 or 6.0 Conversion

Quote:
Originally Posted by N2TRUX View Post
If I were going to do an LSx swap, I would find a 6.2L . They are the best bang for the buck even if you pay a bit more for them.
Hell, yeah! They can be stroked to 426 cubes and make massive power. The square port heads flat-out flow!

pumpgas left out my favorite combo: 4.125" bore x 4.00" stroke for 427 cubes of butt-puckering power!!!
BigBlocksRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com