The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-09-2013, 10:51 PM   #1
Newbe
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Elko Nevada
Posts: 6
Check it out.

I just bought this 1971 SWB and am trying to figure out if this suspension is something I need to mess with. The truck was converted from 2 to 4 wd by its previous owner and I am wondering if this suspension setup is sturdy enough to trust. You can see that he took the trailing arms from underneath the axles and mounted them on top instead. I would assume this is where the majority of the lift came from. He also left the factory springs in and put an aftermarket panhard rod in.

My questions are 1. Should I worry about the diff staying centered under the truck with this type of setup? I think leaf springs may be a better option but am not sure

2. Is the pinion angle a problem? It seems to me that the travel in the suspension would compromise the strength of the pinion seal.
Attached Images
 
Newbe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 11:44 PM   #2
INSIDIOUS '86
Registered User
 
INSIDIOUS '86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: washington
Posts: 4,178
Re: Check it out.

How is your suspension going to travel with shocks like that? Them tubes are long as my......truck lol. Looks like they have 6" of travel and your pinion angle looks to be backwards
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
377 sbc thumpr cam autogear m23 muncie 3:73 Detroit trutrac
3''spintech prostreet mufflers xpipe 1 3/4 headers
build thread !http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=577217
Iroc gauge threadhttp://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=554511
INSIDIOUS '86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 12:00 AM   #3
Newbe
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Elko Nevada
Posts: 6
Re: Check it out.

Yeah....I'm not really sure what the previous owner was going for. The suspension on this is rigid enough to rattle your teeth out. I have never messed with these types of rear suspensions and really don't now where to start. I'm thinking it may be easier to just lose the trailing arms and mount it on leafs. The only problem with that is trying to match the lift with the front end.
Newbe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 01:34 AM   #4
andrewmp6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Louisville,Ky
Posts: 5,811
Re: Check it out.

I wouldn't drive it like that,The shocks are about bottomed out at right height the panhard bar is wrong and the pinion angle looks to be pointing down.Yeah leaf springs would be a lot easier to have.
andrewmp6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2013, 12:01 PM   #5
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,032
Re: Check it out.

As far as what others pointed out, it would be easy enough to source other shocks the right length, tweak the Panhard bar to be parallel, & add pinion shims to dial in the pinion. IMO... it's easier to tweak what's there vs. swapping to an entire new set-up.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2013, 02:44 PM   #6
Newbe
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Elko Nevada
Posts: 6
Re: Check it out.

Just crawled under and looked a bit closer at the pinion/t-case angles. they aren't as bad as I initially thought. Whoever lifted the truck did a couple things right. The t-case and pinion are perfectly parallel which is a good sign. I haven't measured the angles of the u-joint but I can tell they are well past the optimal. I don't really see there being any way to improve that without completely overhauling it.

I will be changing the shocks though. They are indeed almost fully compressed and that is most definitely NOT helping the ride. I was worried that the rear end wouldn't be rigid enough but after driving it that is not the case.

Is the panhard rod supposed to be exactly parallel with the diff?. If that is the case I will have to move it as well
Attached Images
 
Newbe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2013, 03:09 PM   #7
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,032
Re: Check it out.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Newbe View Post
Is the panhard rod supposed to be exactly parallel with the diff?. If that is the case I will have to move it as well
It should be parallel w/the rear end or as close to it as possible for minimal shift.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com