Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-23-2015, 04:38 PM | #26 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,181
|
Re: Long Bed To Short Bed Question
Quote:
|
|
12-23-2015, 05:16 PM | #27 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: North Bend Wa
Posts: 355
|
Re: Long Bed To Short Bed Question
__________________
65 C20 292 4spd 4:56 Eaton HO52 |
12-23-2015, 05:30 PM | #28 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 877
|
Re: Long Bed To Short Bed Question
I sure wouldn't want to trust a 110v MIG to get good penetration on 1/4" when it comes to life safety things. I agree that, in that case, bolting is a better option.
__________________
1973 C20, 350/350 |
12-23-2015, 05:38 PM | #29 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,181
|
Re: Long Bed To Short Bed Question
Quote:
I honestly wouldn't cut a frame without bolting it together just add extra measure regardless. |
|
12-23-2015, 07:29 PM | #30 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Lester West Virginia
Posts: 244
|
Re: Long Bed To Short Bed Question
The welder being 110 doesn't matter as much as what amp it's capable of producing being able to get to both sides to weld both sides should need to v it frames are not thick enough to need it if your weld both sides
|
12-23-2015, 07:35 PM | #31 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: North Bend Wa
Posts: 355
|
Re: Long Bed To Short Bed Question
Following the beveled method diagrammed above gives good results with 110v. A Z cut with a fish plate and you're golden.
__________________
65 C20 292 4spd 4:56 Eaton HO52 |
12-24-2015, 12:50 PM | #32 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Port St. Joe Fl.
Posts: 494
|
Re: Long Bed To Short Bed Question
If you are shortening the truck just for looks than Ok. If you need to use your truck leave it alone. It looks great as it is.
|
12-24-2015, 07:07 PM | #33 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 877
|
Re: Long Bed To Short Bed Question
Quote:
My old roommate (who won significant competitions, then taught welding at the local CC, and now works on prototypes for a major car company) wanted a rated output of at least 1A per .001" thickness, so he was iffy about using the Lincoln 175HD I have on 3/16 even. Using the right FCAW wires can increase capacity. Lincoln seems to agree with him, for solid wire they only rate it for .135" steel. When building something that isn't safety critical, I see nothing wrong with working outside that range but I personally wouldn't on a frame. Using FCAW you can do significantly thicker - the chart goes up to 5/16" for that. When it comes to something that can kill you, I'll listen to him and Lincoln. http://www.lincolnelectric.com/asset...ln3/imt825.pdf page 30 is the chart from Lincoln. I strongly prefer a bevel (or double bevel depending on how you're doing the weld) on anything important. They'll allow full penetration with less of a root gap, and therefore less distortion. Fish plates help a lot, and might let you get away with a weld that isn't otherwise adequate.
__________________
1973 C20, 350/350 |
|
12-24-2015, 09:05 PM | #34 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Lester West Virginia
Posts: 244
|
Re: Long Bed To Short Bed Question
How thick do think the frame are on the 73-87 trucks and if where going to get technical on it its 120 and 240 is the voltage for most standard homes in the us and yes i do agree on the 1 amp per thousand what I was referring to was to use a welder close to the being able to put out the amps needed for the job and most of the ratings listed on the welder are in a single pass and perfect conditions would I weld a frame with a 110 welder yes and not bat a eye as long as it wasn't a cheap no name welder with 3 or 4 setting and I know I could trust the amp output rating listed on the welder
|
Bookmarks |
|
|