|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-11-2016, 08:24 AM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Nova Scotia Canada
Posts: 145
|
Rear Spring Height - Has someone torched these?
Wierd that they are so tight in the middle. Do you guys think someone torched them?
__________________
1968 GMC truck 910 Trim (Canadian) 127" WB 3 on the Three Trans (Saginaw SM330) 250 ci L6 Engine HEI ignition (early 80s L6) |
|
|
|
08-11-2016, 08:32 AM
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Delaware and Long Island, New York
Posts: 3,455
|
Re: Rear Spring Height - Has someone torched these?
That looks normal and worn. I'd be more concerned with the plate welded to the frame, shorten down lwb?
|
|
|
|
|
08-11-2016, 08:35 AM
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Nova Scotia Canada
Posts: 145
|
Re: Rear Spring Height - Has someone torched these?
There looks like a few patch pieces in the frame. It's a LWB.
I am going to take the bed off soon to inspect the frame. I have been pondering building new frame rails like the ones Nolimits does.  I figure I will trace out a pattern while I have the bed off. CAD it up and get it quoted to be laser/waterjet'd. Rather than just patching the cheese....
__________________
1968 GMC truck 910 Trim (Canadian) 127" WB 3 on the Three Trans (Saginaw SM330) 250 ci L6 Engine HEI ignition (early 80s L6) |
|
|
|
|
08-11-2016, 08:40 AM
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Delaware and Long Island, New York
Posts: 3,455
|
Re: Rear Spring Height - Has someone torched these?
Good plan
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
