The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-08-2004, 12:56 AM   #1
ocbaud
Garage Queen Material
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 4,129
pick me some tires out

255/50/17's are what i want.

only need 2 of them right now, but will need to get another pair of 275/50/17's later on.

i've been reading lots of reviews of the nitto 450's and most people say they suck with traction and driving.
ocbaud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2004, 07:13 AM   #2
swervin ervin
You get what you pay for
 
swervin ervin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Cherryville, NC
Posts: 4,798
The 450's are not a great traction tire, but they don't suck for driving. Here's the thing to remember. If a tire is good for traction, expect to buy them pretty often as they will be soft.
__________________
Mike

1985 Chevy C-10
swervin ervin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2004, 08:19 AM   #3
gldevall
Registered User
 
gldevall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Walker, LA
Posts: 2,925
Kumho seems to be a popular brand right now and they are not very expensive. I would stay away from BF Goodrich. From my past experience they wear out too fast.
__________________
Gary -1986 SWB: lowered 4/6, SOLD!!!
-Best 1/4 mile: 14.51 @ 91.01 MPH
-2001 Pewter Tahoe, billet grill, Corsa Sport Cat-back, K&N FIPK SOLD!!!
-2004 Z-71 Extended cab with a flowmaster, BDS 6.5", 3" BL, 35x12.5x18 Trail Grapplers on Pro-Comp 18x9 wheels
gldevall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2004, 08:29 AM   #4
Jonboy
Slots go on anything!
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 5,957
I had good luck with the 255/50/17's in the BFG comp T/A KDWS on my 96 Impala. They wore a lot better than the Nitto 450's that were on it.
Jonboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2004, 01:46 PM   #5
twoodson
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lancaster, TX
Posts: 291
I am running the Falken Ziex S/TZ-01 in a 255/50/17 up front and a 275/50/17 in the rear. They are pretty good I need to replace my two front ones due to wear caused by a sticking brake caliper and a little mis alignment. From Discount Tire the 275's are about $140.01 ea. and the 255's are about $117.01 ea.
twoodson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2004, 02:04 PM   #6
ocbaud
Garage Queen Material
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 4,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by twoodson
I am running the Falken Ziex S/TZ-01 in a 255/50/17 up front and a 275/50/17 in the rear. They are pretty good I need to replace my two front ones due to wear caused by a sticking brake caliper and a little mis alignment. From Discount Tire the 275's are about $140.01 ea. and the 255's are about $117.01 ea.
those are the 2 temp. rear tires i'll be using(275/50/17 falken ziex s/tz-01) until i get matching tires on all 4 corners
ocbaud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2004, 06:08 PM   #7
8t5Silverado
Mudslides 'r my specialty
 
8t5Silverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: STL
Posts: 1,106
I like my Sumitomo HTR+'s and Falken Ziex 512's.

I don't know if they come in the size you want.
__________________
Always on the lookout for old cars and parts...(20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, etc.)

http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/500339
8t5Silverado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2004, 06:20 PM   #8
Izzy
Trucker.
 
Izzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,364
Quote:
Originally Posted by gldevall
Kumho seems to be a popular brand right now and they are not very expensive. I would stay away from BF Goodrich. From my past experience they wear out too fast.
I agree on both accounts.

I have had Kumhos for 3 years now on my wifes 98 on 2 different sets of wheels(16 & 18") and they get great milage for the price and they are a real nice daily tire but I can break them loose very easily with a 305. I'd imagine your engine would make them spin for days.
Izzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2004, 11:39 PM   #9
ocbaud
Garage Queen Material
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 4,129
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....omCompare1=yes

what about those?
ocbaud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2004, 11:54 PM   #10
low 84
Registered User
 
low 84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,144
the nitto nt450's and the kumho 712's and 711's are pretty comparable as far as wear and performance. the bfg kdws will last longer, but they arn't directional and you'll sacrifice a little performance.

the bfg kdw and nitto 555 would be a step up performance wise from the 450's and 712's, but cost more and wear faster
__________________
'51 F100, backhalf with a narrowed 9 and coil overs, 18.5" mickeys, monte front clip, +400" sbc in the works

'05 1500 Crew Cab

RIP
'84 swb 5/7 drop, solid cammed 408 w/ fully ported dart heads, th350 w/ 10 inch hughes, 12 bolt w/ 3.73 richmonds and a locker
'80 swb 4x4 in progress: 7" lift, 350 th350/np205, d44 and 1.5" ORD tie rod, 14BFF w/discs , armored diff covers, 40" MTR's
low 84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2004, 12:00 AM   #11
ocbaud
Garage Queen Material
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 4,129
and they dont make the nitto 555's in the size i want
ocbaud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2004, 08:45 AM   #12
ItsNotABlazer
The full convertible guy
 
ItsNotABlazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Paris Texas
Posts: 728
I just bought some Nitto 450s for the front of my 95. I had the Pirelli Scorpion p Zero's on it and I would highly suggest staying away from these tires lol. The Pirellis when cold almost felt like the tires were out of balance but after driving them for a while they would level out and ride ok but the Nittos ride really well. I dont know about traction wise with them on the truck (I baby it) but I know my 94 Z28 with T56 that traction is not a word that is used.

I have heard of a lot of people using the Kumho's but I have never had any experience with them personally.

Brad
__________________
2012 Kawasaki Vaquero (Lime Green)
2000 BMW 740iL
1995 Chevy ECSB riding on air
1975 GMC Jimmy 2WD lowered 4/6
1972 Chevy Trazer soon to be roadster
1965 Mustang 289/3 speed (friends dad bought it new)
1964 Chevy C10 (dad bought it new)
ItsNotABlazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2004, 01:30 PM   #13
76bonanza
Senior Member
 
76bonanza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: St robert Mo
Posts: 2,001
I ran the nitto 555's before I sold my F**D Lightning and they had pretty good bite. but only ran them for like 4 months and then sold it so can not speak for wear. I think they were 295 45 18's.
__________________
1968 c10
lowered 3" 4"
355/Th400 built by Hatfield racing in joplin MO
76bonanza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2004, 02:05 PM   #14
Izzy
Trucker.
 
Izzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,364
Quote:
Originally Posted by ocbaud
Those are the ones on my wifes 98 and they are pretty nice.
Izzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com