![]() |
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Brandon, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 970
|
60-66 vs 67-72 cab room
Biggest complaint I have about my 65 is lack of driver room ( I'm 6'3). I'm wondering how the next series compares for room.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,970
|
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room
Quote:
The cabs didn't start getting any 'roomier' until the OBS '88 year model.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Columbus, MS
Posts: 444
|
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room
I'm 6'3" 255 and I think my '60 is more comfortable to drive and has a little more room than my brother's '71. He actually pointed it out to me and he's 6'4" 270.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,970
|
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room
Same seats in both trucks?
My 64 & 67 both have Buddy Buckets w/no in-cab tanks. I've sat in both w/them as far back as they can go. Even @ only 5'11, they feel the same to me as far as lacking room.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Active Member
![]() Join Date: Sep 2023
Location: randolph va
Posts: 149
|
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room
you just need to be 5 nine and weight 175 pounds. lol
I had a 66 sb about 30 years ago and had plenty of room, I have a 65 lb now and have no room but am 65 lbs heaver
__________________
Old dogs and children and watermelon wine ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,970
|
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room
I do feel for those over 6' in this old iron 🤣
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Sonora California
Posts: 281
|
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room
I have a 62 and I am 6'4". I have the same complaint.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Denver, co
Posts: 113
|
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room
stock seat here. i'm cramped at 6-2 but love driving these trucks
![]()
__________________
Denver/Big Island -- Instagram: Slammed66c10 '46 Fleetmaster Coupe '64 C10 on Ridetech Air Ride '66 C10 on GSI Bagged Chassis - in progress '12 FLHR '11 Custom Homebuilt Chop/Softail |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Columbus, MS
Posts: 444
|
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room
A 40/20/40 OBS seat in really good condition made a big difference for me as far as comfort. At least twice a year, we take rides anywhere from 5 to 8 hours and I honestly don't have too many complaints. The only complaint passengers have is the "knee knocker" cab design. My wife's used to it but other passengers, not so much LOL
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Derby Kansas
Posts: 370
|
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room
I have a 61 and 62. In the 62 it has the tank in the cab and a late 80's bench seat in it. I'm 6' tall and it's not terrible and my 85 isn't much better.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 58
|
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room
Shoot, I have to scoot my seat up at 5'8" in my '63! Probably only two benefits in life of being petite stature: Fitting in my C10 and flying commercially.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: central California
Posts: 2,736
|
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: nampa, idaho
Posts: 332
|
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room
I'm 6'2 and 185 lbs. I had to sell my 1950 3100 because I simply could not fit into it.
I couldn't even push in the clutch because my knee would mash up against the back of the steering wheel before I could even get my foot on the clutch pedal. The 60-66 cab was soooo much better, sold my 1950 and have been a 60-66 fan ever since. Miss my 1950 sometimes, but I just couldn't fit in the darn thing. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Townsend MT
Posts: 1,725
|
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room
I have heard early 90's seats have a thinner back and will gain you a little room...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: central California
Posts: 2,736
|
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Salmon Arm BC
Posts: 169
|
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room
I'm 6'3" and feel like a gorilla driving my 70. I want to keep the original seat so I am going to lower the brackets for it and relocate the fuel tank so I can push it back further. If it is still not comfortable I will look for a thinner seat.
So no don't count on the 67-72 being more comfortable.
__________________
1970 C10 l/b 292/4spd Build: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=811062 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|