The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-06-2004, 05:49 PM   #1
SanitysBane
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 2,121
gettin' down!

all right i think i have enough money and time, time to drop the beast. right now from the ground to the body line is (measured from center of the wheel well) DF-36 PF-35 DR-39 DF-37.5, the battery is in the pasinger back corner of the bed which is why that side is lower, plus the PF spring has been stressed from running into a culvert. im running a 26 inch tall tire on the rear and a 27 on the front with 15' rims. the question is how low, just a shackle to even things out or a 2/4, 4/6 or 5/7. i plan on getting some 17s on the front and 18s on the bach when money comes in. i don't havr any steep drive ways that i need to tackle or offroading. so what do y'all think and pictures are always good. and i've also heard of drop spindles causing the LCA's to brake, this did happen to my friends 1990 GMC i also have the added weight of the big block upfront as well. thanks for any help.
__________________
'96 Nissan Pathfinder
'02 Firebird Trans Am.
'88 K5 Blazer
SanitysBane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2004, 10:05 PM   #2
SanitysBane
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 2,121
anyone at all?
__________________
'96 Nissan Pathfinder
'02 Firebird Trans Am.
'88 K5 Blazer
SanitysBane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2004, 10:16 AM   #3
loweredd
www.loweredd.com
 
loweredd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Struble IA
Posts: 808
The only reason I can think of a drop spindle causing a control arm to "break" would be if you ran into something in the road since the control arm would be lower than normal.

I would say bag it.

Once you lower it, you are just going to want to go lower in a month or two. LOL.
loweredd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2004, 06:44 PM   #4
SanitysBane
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 2,121
bags are WAY out of the question, i want to put major lack of money plus i would have to do it all on my own, if i bagged dad already told me he would refuse to help
__________________
'96 Nissan Pathfinder
'02 Firebird Trans Am.
'88 K5 Blazer
SanitysBane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2004, 08:08 PM   #5
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
What you may have heard about control arms breaking is not actually caused by the spindles. Sometimes when running 3" spindles with smaller rims or even deep backspace on larger rims the back of the rim will hit the control arm. To eliminate this problem people grind the lip of the control arm away. This can create a stress point and cause failure of the control arm.

If your going to lower it and can't afford to bag it then go with a 5/7 drop. If you go 4/6 your goinng to want more later. You may as well do it one time and be done with it.....
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com

Articles-

"Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab

"Elwood" the77_Remix

85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett"

"Refining Sierra"
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2004, 09:03 PM   #6
TIMSPEED
 
TIMSPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 1,321
Quote:
Originally Posted by N2TRUX
Sometimes when running 3" spindles with smaller rims or even deep backspace on larger rims the back of the rim will hit the control arm. To eliminate this problem people grind the lip of the control arm away. This can create a stress point and cause failure of the control arm.
NOW they tell me! LOL
__________________
I have a few cars...
See Them Here
TIMSPEED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2004, 10:21 PM   #7
SanitysBane
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 2,121
belltech did sell weld on covers to go over the bottom of the LCA on the 88+ trucks, anyone know if this was just because of a weaker LCA design in 88+ trucks?
__________________
'96 Nissan Pathfinder
'02 Firebird Trans Am.
'88 K5 Blazer
SanitysBane is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com