Static VS bagged - The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

chris1044 · 11-11-2014, 10:54 PM

Static front and bagged rear is, in my opinion, probably the best suited to my use. I'm also interested in how it rides. I've been looking into this in a 4-6" drop with some aftermarket A-arms up front the last day or so.

My main concern with static is I don't want to drag the crossmember, and I want to be able to align it/clear fenders and not have to limit travel.

With bags in the back - anyone just running bags and manually adjusting? People say this is a no-no because a schrader can fail and leave you stranded....but so can the ones in your tires.

11-11-2014, 10:54 PM	#11
chris1044 Registered User Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: MI Posts: 56	Re: Static VS bagged Static front and bagged rear is, in my opinion, probably the best suited to my use. I'm also interested in how it rides. I've been looking into this in a 4-6" drop with some aftermarket A-arms up front the last day or so. My main concern with static is I don't want to drag the crossmember, and I want to be able to align it/clear fenders and not have to limit travel. With bags in the back - anyone just running bags and manually adjusting? People say this is a no-no because a schrader can fail and leave you stranded....but so can the ones in your tires.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode



Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.