The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-02-2017, 01:20 PM   #13
Keith Seymore
Registered User
 
Keith Seymore's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Motor City
Posts: 9,213
Re: Rebuilt Driveshaft - Thumping After Install

Quote:
Originally Posted by harpo231
attachment
This is a pretty good chart, but could use some explanation:

"Perfect - inline": this is true from a u joint acceleration/deceleration aspect, and would be ideal in theory but not in practice. The issue is twofold: 1) without any u joint working angle the rollers do not rotate inside the cup, causing them to "brinnell" a low spot in the cup and resulting in a disturbance, and 2) there is rear axle pinion nose windup during vehicle acceleration and deceleration, (and in trim height due to cargo loading/unloading) so the shaft doesn't really stay straight during vehicle use.

"Parallel; moderate strain/minimal vibration": This is ideal, with angles equal and opposite and less than 3-7 degrees. However, "strain" is not really the right word choice, as it is not a strain issue but the disturbance caused by the acceleration and deceleration of the u joints as they rotate. The equal and opposite characteristic allows the accel/decal to cancel out (while one is accelerating the other joint is decelerating the same amount) resulting in no disturbance and no vibration, and also provides some windage so that if the angles are set up like this statically then you come closer to the "inline" setting during vehicle use.

"No! High strain/bad vibration": again - it's not "strain" but accel/decal of the joint. Angles higher than 7 degrees are greater than what a single cardan joint can accommodate. Differing angles front and rear do not allow the accel/decal pairs to cancel each other out.

"Absolutely not! etc": the issue here is that the angles do not cancel each other out and are, in fact, additive. "Poor pinion vibration" has nothing to do with this.

K
Attached Images
 
__________________
Chevrolet Flint Assembly
1979-1986
GM Full Size Truck Engineering
1986 - 2019
Intro from an Old Assembly Guy: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926
My Pontiac story: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524
Chevelle intro: http://www.superchevy.com/features/s...hevy-chevelle/

Last edited by Keith Seymore; 10-03-2017 at 11:47 AM.
Keith Seymore is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com