07-25-2010, 08:01 AM | #11 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: High Plains of Colorado
Posts: 2,485
|
Re: 1965 Seat Belts???
The Seat Belt Story
(The Medical and Public Health Law Site) First, there is popular concern about accidents Individual stories - MADD is an exampleInterest Groups Nader and Public InterestThen Congress passes the Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act 1967 - regulation requiring seatbelts 1972 - realized that people where not wearing the seatbelts Regulation requiring automatic seatbelts or airbags by 1975 Required cars between 1973 and 1975 to have automatic seatbelts or ignition interlocks Chrysler v. DOT affirmed the regs Industry choose interlocks - why? 1974 - Congress passed a law banning regs requiring interlocks and said that all future regs on passive restraints had to be submitted to Congress for legislative veto DOT under Ford withdrew the regs DOT under Carter (a few months later) passed new passive restraint regs for 1982 and Congress did not veto them 1979 - Regs were affirmed in Pacific Legal Foundation v. DOT 1981 - DOT under Reagan withdrew the regs because the car companies were going to use automatic seatbelts that could be disconnected. 1983 - Motor Vehicles Manufacturers Assoc. v. State Farm hit the United States Supreme Court The court ruled that the DOT could not withdraw the reg without a proper explanation of its actions1984 - DOT (E. Dole) promulgated a reg requiring automatic seatbelts or airbags in all cars after 1989, unless 2/3 of the population were covered by state seatbelt laws The laws had to meet certain criteria What did MO do?1997 - most newer cars had airbags 1998 - airbags kill grannies and little kids! Nothing new - known at the time1999 - You can get your airbag disconnected Products liability issues? |
Bookmarks |
|
|