The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-01-2011, 05:06 PM   #22
C-10 simplex
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: indisclosed
Posts: 1,515
Re: Gear Ratio ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregg72340 View Post
Not to even remotly try to hijack this thread but where do the early 350 diesels play into this? Would the basic small block application apply here? I just picked up a free 12 bolt from a diesel but havent had the time to check the ratio yet and would definitly like to get rid of my 2.73's
1) i did not read carefully---you are referring to the oldsmoboggie diesel, not the 6.2?
You got, get this----2.76 standard code HC2, 3.08 would be code HE3, and if 3.40 then code HE4, not sure if posi also comes with HE4 These are very strange ratios.

i'm not sure if these are dependent on GVWR's and the early diesel trucks had a crapload of them.

Would it be out of the question to take the cover off and physically count the teeth? The oil could probably use a changing anyways.




Quote:
Originally Posted by LONGHAIR View Post
I doubt that you will get much "fun" out of a 2.50 first gear with a heavy pick-up truck? You really need a lower rear end gear to make it more drivable, but that creates highway RPM issues.
These "performance car" transmisions just don't have a wide enough gear spread for trucks as an "all around" daily driver. The generally taller tires of a truck make it worse.
2) To me just banging thru 3 gears is fun. But yes, if you wanted better acceleration then maybe 4.11 would be better but then mpg might suffer.

3) i can't make any further "recommendations" for rear end ratios (esp when coupled with 4sp) because i'm not really qualified to----i'm trying to figure out my own situation as well.

i do, however, feel that riding a 10sp bike can be very educational----general consensus is that a taller ratio would take less "energy" to turn, but this is often not the case.
C-10 simplex is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com