![]() |
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: confusion, USA
Posts: 206
|
![]()
I've got an 1984 C10 with a 427 BBC and a TH400 trans, and a shift kit. its a bit doggish off the line due to a .561 lift comp cam, but moves through the gears very well and spins like an animal once you take off the initial hit of the pedal and will rip the tires off in 1st and 2nd gear, but when it hits 3rd it falls on its face because of the tall rear gears.
the spec sheet says the truck has 3.08's in the rear, great for highways but any kind of take offs it sucks even with a BBC. so I'm debating doing a set of either 3.90's or 3.73's for the rear, do you think the 3.90's would be too short with the torque of a BBC? also i have a crappy old outdated Holley double pumper 650cfm carb, and its got mechanical secondaries, which suck for the street, i like vacuum secondaries, much better response. so I'm looking at a quick fuel 750CFM slayer carb. so what do you think how much of a difference will i get for my money? I don't want the truck to just roast the tires off constantly, (although it is fun) i want it to accelerate quickly but not fall on its face and not move in 3rd gear. obviously it spins pretty good now, but I'm still left with some more bite to be desired. |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|