The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-23-2021, 06:39 PM   #1
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,994
Shortening & Modifying a Tilt Column Question/Concern

So I've cut down a 67-72 era tilt/auto column-shift column to use in my 64 project. I progressively trimmed the outer housing/tube as well as the column shift-tube & the actual steering shaft to the length needed for my modified set-up.

With all of that done/started, the mocked-up column is a finger-tips width away from the dash for increased interior room as well as closer to the firewall for better u-joint angles to the R&P steering unit (Porterbuilt Dropmember set-up).

I'm happy w/how everything is looking. The u-joints + steering shafts are temporarily in place to verify the joint angles & shaft clearance within the engine compartment. I'm ready to pull it all back out & finish welding the housing & shifter tube as well as machine the end of the steering column shaft for a DD joint. This is where I have the question....

There does not appear to be a 'center' reference mark on the steering-wheel end of this shaft (where the splines are for the steering wheel) like on later model columns. Since the steering wheel end of the shaft is splined, the R&P output shaft is splined, & one of the two joints used is splined, does it make a difference where I need to machine the flats for the double-d side of the 2nd joint where it will seat on the column shaft? In my head the splined ends allow for a fair amount of adjustment but I'm not certain it would be enough that 'where' the flats for the shaft are machined are irrelevant.

I thought I would post up & see if other hot-rodders might chime in w/their thoughts & experiences.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com