The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > All 4x4 Tech & Off Roading

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-01-2004, 10:00 PM   #1
uncle_handsome
Uncle H. is this cartoon
 
uncle_handsome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mississauga, SC (I wish! lol!) Ontario
Posts: 797
Question Front wheel travel; 88-98 C1500 vs. K1500

Hello! I'm interested in buyin' a truck. I don't need 4wd so I thought I might prefer to save myself money and get a C1500. The other day I saw (what appeared to be) a stock C1500 go up on a hydraulic lift for something like an oil change. I saw the rear axle droop at least 6" but the front wheels only travelled maybe 3-4" at the most while the truck was lifted 5 feet off the ground.

My question is this; has anyone noticed what kind of wheel travel a stock K1500 has? I heard that without going to a straight axle it is near impossible to get more wheel travel out of a GM IFS 4wd front suspension. If I can only get a maximum of maybe 4" (or less) of downward travel on a tire (with no weight on it) without going to a straight axle I'll stick with the lamer 2wd truck.

(Ideally I'd like to see the front suspension able to extend down as far as the rear axle does)
uncle_handsome is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2004, 01:42 AM   #2
1FaastC10
Account Suspended
 
1FaastC10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Elkhart, IN
Posts: 6,399
stick with 2wd, or SFA. IFS is crap. i'm working on a deal to replace my IFS truck with another SFA truck.
1FaastC10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2004, 09:06 PM   #3
uncle_handsome
Uncle H. is this cartoon
 
uncle_handsome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mississauga, SC (I wish! lol!) Ontario
Posts: 797
So 88-98 GM's K1500's front suspension has worse flex and travel than the C1500's do???
uncle_handsome is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 05:59 PM   #4
1FaastC10
Account Suspended
 
1FaastC10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Elkhart, IN
Posts: 6,399
i think they're about the same, but the ride with the coils in the front is SOOO much better than the torsion bars that the K1500s have. i'm actually partial to the handling of a leaf sprung truck, my '77 K20 and the '79 K20 i bought a few winters ago were both very smooth riding trucks.
1FaastC10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2004, 05:27 AM   #5
jays68yak
Registered User
 
jays68yak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Gilroy, CA
Posts: 1,453
Quote:
Originally Posted by uncle_handsome
So 88-98 GM's K1500's front suspension has worse flex and travel than the C1500's do???

I would bet this would be somewhat correct.

My k2500, basicly the same thing, is almost bottomed out on the stops for it going to full drop. I would also note that I have the bars tighten a bit.

If you think about it, a c1500 and a k1500 are basicly the same design up front. Not saying that parts will interchange, but the basic design of the two is the same. If you are after lots of travel, two options come to mind.

2wd with a prerunner suspension
4wd converted to SFA, leafs would be ok, coilover 4 link setup would be the best.
__________________
1969 Chevy Project SWB Fleet, 20s, 5.3, t56, in the weeds.
1970 Chevy Truck cab on a 1979 Jimmy frame-8.1 liter 496 bbc/sm465/np203-jeds doubler-np205/d60/14bff Welded/42 tsls on recentered H1s
1998 Chevy Crew Cab K3500 SAS'd with hpd60, links and swayaway coilovers. 8.1l vortec DD/towrig



"I like long walks, especially when they are taken by people who annoy me. "
jays68yak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2004, 03:03 PM   #6
uncle_handsome
Uncle H. is this cartoon
 
uncle_handsome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mississauga, SC (I wish! lol!) Ontario
Posts: 797
Thanks for your help. I don't need 12-15" of travel like a pre-runner or a wild 4x4, I'd just like the same (or almost the same) wheel travel that the rear has. To me a perfect truck would have 5-6" of extension (unloaded) and maybe 4-6" of compression. The main problem I guess is I want a truck for $5000 or less and I live in a "rust belt" area, in a city too; we have a 2 car garage, already own 3 vehicles and have almost no extra land.

Any suggestions (besides moving; I want to but can't now)
uncle_handsome is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2004, 03:53 PM   #7
1FaastC10
Account Suspended
 
1FaastC10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Elkhart, IN
Posts: 6,399
73-87 K series truck sounds perfect for you.
1FaastC10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2004, 04:44 PM   #8
uncle_handsome
Uncle H. is this cartoon
 
uncle_handsome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mississauga, SC (I wish! lol!) Ontario
Posts: 797
Do you have any advice about what to look for and lookout for in a "rust-belt" 73-87 K-series truck. I don't mind if it's a little ugly. I do want everything to work or at least what doesn't easily (and cheaply) repairable. Are body panels cheap or at least reasonably priced? Would there be any frame damage from rust?

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
uncle_handsome is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2004, 12:04 AM   #9
Destructo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lewisville, NC
Posts: 1,836
Your going to have trouble finding a rust free body on a 73-87 truck where your at, but usually the 81-87 trucks didn't rust out as bad, and repair parts for the body are just about the cheapest of anything out there, are as all the other parts, very cheap to fix.

I would look-out for frame damage and rusted cab supports, body panels can be fix fairly cheaply, but the cab mounts are kind of a pain and you don't want rusted out body mounts, I don't usually see too many frames that are so rusted their going to be a problem on these trucks, most of the time the frame just has some surface rust if the paint has been scraped off.

And if your not going to use the truck off-road why are you worried about how much suspension travel you have? a 73-87 K10 or K1500 is going to have more suspension travel than a 88-up IFS truck. And I think the 88-up 2wd trucks have coils in the front?
__________________
1985 Scottsdale Shortbed 4x4
Stout 350 with some "upgrades"-700r4-33x12.5" Mud Tires, Warn 8274-50 winch.

2005 Chevrolet Colorado Regular Cab 2wd 4-banger, 5 speed, Street Pack with 3.73 axle.
Destructo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2004, 01:51 AM   #10
1FaastC10
Account Suspended
 
1FaastC10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Elkhart, IN
Posts: 6,399
88+ C trucks have coils, in fact, all C trucks have had coils up front since the 60s. in 88 they began to use torsion bars on the front of K trucks, everything prior to that was leafed.
1FaastC10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2004, 10:36 PM   #11
uncle_handsome
Uncle H. is this cartoon
 
uncle_handsome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mississauga, SC (I wish! lol!) Ontario
Posts: 797
Can you see cab supports or frame mounts from looking under a truck? (instead of having to remove the cab to see the damage) I'd rather not buy a rust-belt truck but I live in Canada and every vehicle here must have the speedometer and odometer in kilometers, so that'd cost a few hundred bucks. I know if I lived just an hour east of here (in western NY) I could just buy a Southern truck and take it home with no problems. (salted roads are the only thing I hate more than snow and I love weather in the low 100's F.)

Thanks for all your input! You all have been great. Merry Christmas!!!
uncle_handsome is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com