![]() |
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Lenox,IL
Posts: 306
|
Quote:
__________________
1985 Chevrolet C-30 454 1-TON Dooley 1969 CHEVROLET CST-10 PICK-UP Good memories 1999 Chevrolet Z71 Ext. cab 5.7L Good Memories With a quart of oil, and a gallon of gas, she won't let no other car pass!!!. ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,266
|
GM made 315 Horse out of the 283 with a make shift fuel injection system, with todays heads being even much more efficient than even some of the best heads produced up to the mid 90's dont even compare to the current Vortecs heads (not that I am a Vortec Head Lover by any means). There have been many 283's pushed out well beyond 300HP without blowers, Turbos or even Nitrous. Smokey Yunick made 430HP in a naturally aspirated 283, another guy did over 800hp with twin turbos. If GM can spin up a 2.8litre V6 naturally aspirated to 430hp I see no reason 300+hp cant be done to a 283 respectable and also be dependable. Good heads, proper intake/carb or fuel injection & the right cam should have no problem especially with todays technology. Gas milage could also be optimum in an engine with shorter stroke & smaller bore where it doesnt suck so much air & fuel to breath when matched with proper gearing.
__________________
1967 C10 - SWBSS Pro Street 427sbc, 700R4 & 4.10 Gears 1948 Chevy FleetMaster Coupe, LS1, (almost done) 1950 Chevy StyleLine Coupe 250/6 3x2 Dueces 2009 Toyota Tundra 1996 Harley RoadKing "I maybe getting old, but I can still burn rubber with the best of them" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|