The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-08-2002, 08:27 PM   #1
Dean23
68cst_ss490
 
Dean23's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: edmonton,canada
Posts: 1,363
Post Carb. help needed.

I have a 350 with a L-79 cam, 9.5 comp headers, with a performer rpm intake. Edelbrock recommends a 1407(750cfm). Is that too much carb for this combination???? Any help would be great.Or should I go with the 1406(600cfm)???

------------------
Dean
edmonton,canada
68 c10, project in works,350, th350, plain jane.
SLOW AND STEADY GETS THE PANELS READY
http://communities.msn.ca/MyChevytruckpage


__________________
Dean
edmonton,canada
a winter wonderland
2005 Chevrolet Avalanche LT
cold air intake, performance exhaust, Comp cams cam, jba shorty ceramic headers.

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3090973
Dean23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2002, 08:31 PM   #2
Randy70C-10
Account Suspended
 
Randy70C-10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Virginia Beach, Va. U.S.A.
Posts: 15,320
Post

Valve size? If you're running 202's, you should be OK.
Randy70C-10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2002, 08:34 PM   #3
Dean23
68cst_ss490
 
Dean23's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: edmonton,canada
Posts: 1,363
Post

1.94's. the price diff on the 2 is 10 bucks so thats no difference to me. I just want the engine to perform well

------------------
Dean
edmonton,canada
68 c10, project in works,350, th350, plain jane.
SLOW AND STEADY GETS THE PANELS READY
http://communities.msn.ca/MyChevytruckpage


__________________
Dean
edmonton,canada
a winter wonderland
2005 Chevrolet Avalanche LT
cold air intake, performance exhaust, Comp cams cam, jba shorty ceramic headers.

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3090973
Dean23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2002, 08:58 PM   #4
bigjimzlll
Senior Member
 
bigjimzlll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Redding,CA...USA
Posts: 4,736
Post

the 1406 has an electric choke...the 1407 doesnt..i think...I myself would of gone for the 750...but trust me, I always think bigger is better, and that aint usally the truth.
__________________
It's called "drag racing" if they called it "tic..tic..WHAM!..BANG! F*&K!!!", they'd have to keep the magazines under the counter with the other men's publications

click the clicky to join the site....
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/payments.php


67 lwb..first hotrod in 25 years..540 best ET is 9.45 @ 141.44
Anderson,CA
bigjimzlll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2002, 09:03 PM   #5
Dean23
68cst_ss490
 
Dean23's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: edmonton,canada
Posts: 1,363
Post

I think the same way but i want to be sure I buy the right carb for my engine 750 or 600 cfm??????

------------------
Dean
edmonton,canada
68 c10, project in works,350, th350, plain jane.
SLOW AND STEADY GETS THE PANELS READY
http://communities.msn.ca/MyChevytruckpage


__________________
Dean
edmonton,canada
a winter wonderland
2005 Chevrolet Avalanche LT
cold air intake, performance exhaust, Comp cams cam, jba shorty ceramic headers.

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3090973
Dean23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2002, 09:06 PM   #6
tom hand
CCRider
 
tom hand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Olive Branch,MS,USA
Posts: 2,232
Post

You didn't say what gear you are running,that will make a difference. The smaller carb should give more bottom end,the bigger carb more top end. If you are runnin 4.11's or bigger I would go with the bigger carb. The edelbrock really won't over carb the motor because it is an air valve secondary design. It will only open as much as the motor will take. But the smaller carb will give you a little atvantage off the line if you don't have enough gear.

------------------
72 GMC Sierra SWB almost finished---- 84 Softail
Olive Branch MS

__________________
72 GMC Sierra SWB almost finished---- 84 Softail
Olive Branch MS
tom hand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2002, 09:10 PM   #7
Dean23
68cst_ss490
 
Dean23's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: edmonton,canada
Posts: 1,363
Post

3:73 posi in the rear. it was an original 6cyl 3 on tree truck.

------------------
Dean
edmonton,canada
68 c10, project in works,350, th350, plain jane.
SLOW AND STEADY GETS THE PANELS READY
http://communities.msn.ca/MyChevytruckpage


__________________
Dean
edmonton,canada
a winter wonderland
2005 Chevrolet Avalanche LT
cold air intake, performance exhaust, Comp cams cam, jba shorty ceramic headers.

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3090973
Dean23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2002, 10:09 PM   #8
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,690
Post

Go for the gold man, get the big one.
You should be ok.

------------------
'69 G.M.C. 350/350. Trying to clean up the left over damage from the Dope-Smokin-Old-Man
I've been dubbed the Longhorn Freak/Fanatic/Expert, I just hope I can live up to it.
FINALLY got the HORNIAC...a '70 one ton Longhorn with a Pontiac 350/350 and lots of 'personality'. Check out The Longhorn Webite.
If you need a pic posted, E-mail me at longhornmail@yahoo.com
My name is Andy...not Randy...I'm in Ohio...Not Illinois...close enough?
Columbus Ohio

Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2002, 10:32 PM   #9
Sierra
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Victoria, Texas
Posts: 71
Post

Dean, I have run the 1405 (600 cfm) and 1407 (750 cfm) carburetors on my ZZ4 crate engine with the AirGap RPM manifold and HOT cam. I tested the carbs before and after installation of AFR 195 heads. I also ran both carbs with the electric choke option. The only significant advantage of the larger carb (that I noticed) was slightly more power above 6000 rpm; conversely, a disadvantage of the larger carb was a distinct and irritating lag at lower rpms. A great deal of Edelbrock-inspired tuning efforts failed to completely remove this symptom. IMHO, try the smaller carb first - fuel metering is superior for this cid range.

p.s., Edelbrock did recommend the 750 for my application, but I'm still running the 600, with better results.
Tim
Sierra is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com