The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-05-2007, 12:04 AM   #1
WorkinLonghorn
Senior Member
 
WorkinLonghorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Studio City, Calif.
Posts: 2,883
Consumer Reports "1974 Buying Guide" and our trucks

Found this book the other day and looked up our trucks (it covers '69-72) to see their quality in first few years.

Here's data for the Six;

And the Eight;

Thought it was interesting.The Six did pretty good,but the Eight had some transmission and engine complaints.
__________________
'69 GMC C2500 Custom Camper, 8 1/2' bed, New GM 350, NP 435 Close Ratio 4spd. Trans., 3.73 Dana-60 open.Camper and Trailer wiring, PS, PB, AC, tach , three gas tanks, stereo speakers, 2nd owner, Work-Truck supreme.

Last edited by WorkinLonghorn; 10-05-2007 at 12:06 AM.
WorkinLonghorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2007, 12:26 AM   #2
whatnow123
Registered User
 
whatnow123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 835
Re: Consumer Reports "1974 Buying Guide" and our trucks

That's pretty cool, but what is the rating for the the empty, half and full dots?
__________________
67 Short Step, 355, 700R 4.11 posi rear, 4/6 drop Discs on all 4 corners.

Build thread:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=219094
whatnow123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2007, 12:47 AM   #3
WorkinLonghorn
Senior Member
 
WorkinLonghorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Studio City, Calif.
Posts: 2,883
Re: Consumer Reports "1974 Buying Guide" and our trucks

Oh yeah,forgot to put that.

A Black dot is really a lot of problems reported,lower half of dot black;worse than average,blank dot;average.Bottom of dot blue=better than average and a blue dot means much fewer than average problems for that specific area,ie."engine,mechanical" or "steering",etc.
__________________
'69 GMC C2500 Custom Camper, 8 1/2' bed, New GM 350, NP 435 Close Ratio 4spd. Trans., 3.73 Dana-60 open.Camper and Trailer wiring, PS, PB, AC, tach , three gas tanks, stereo speakers, 2nd owner, Work-Truck supreme.

Last edited by WorkinLonghorn; 10-05-2007 at 09:14 AM.
WorkinLonghorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2007, 12:49 AM   #4
72highlander
Sophomore Member
 
72highlander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: brownwood, tx
Posts: 927
Re: Consumer Reports "1974 Buying Guide" and our trucks

corvette ranks highly
__________________
1972 Chevrolet Highlander SWB
1972 Custom Deluxe 3/4 2WD 60k miles


these trucks don't need vacuum gauges cause they don't suck!
two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights do make a left
all i want is a little more than i'll ever get
it's better to be judged by 12 than to be carried by 6
72highlander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2007, 12:52 AM   #5
Ackattack
Senior Member
 
Ackattack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Valley Center KS
Posts: 3,524
Re: Consumer Reports "1974 Buying Guide" and our trucks

Kinda off the subject, but I hate consumer reports and their reports on vehicles. I think they're the number one reason why people continue to tought Japanese cars. Don't get me wrong the jap cars are good cars, but I think that many american cars are just as good, if not better than the jap cars. Yet consumer reports continues the stereo type japanese cars as super quality and then dog on the american cars. The other day I was looking through it and they they rated the New Tunda's "predicted reliability" as good or excellent...something like that. Then the "predicted reliability" of the new '07 chevy/gmc was "too new to tell" or something like that.

I'm sorry, but the new Tundra has a completly new engine. Yet the GM offerings essentially have the same engines as the previous body style.

This is just one example of there bias towards the Japanese cars. Just my opinion.
Ackattack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2007, 09:19 AM   #6
WorkinLonghorn
Senior Member
 
WorkinLonghorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Studio City, Calif.
Posts: 2,883
Re: Consumer Reports "1974 Buying Guide" and our trucks

I hate them too. I've tried to follow their recommendations on a few things and they seem to ALWAYS get it wrong in the real world.The other thing is that they will recommend a product and when you try to buy it you find that nearly always that model was discontinued last year or something.
__________________
'69 GMC C2500 Custom Camper, 8 1/2' bed, New GM 350, NP 435 Close Ratio 4spd. Trans., 3.73 Dana-60 open.Camper and Trailer wiring, PS, PB, AC, tach , three gas tanks, stereo speakers, 2nd owner, Work-Truck supreme.
WorkinLonghorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2007, 09:22 AM   #7
WorkinLonghorn
Senior Member
 
WorkinLonghorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Studio City, Calif.
Posts: 2,883
Re: Consumer Reports "1974 Buying Guide" and our trucks

Quote:
corvette ranks highly
I noticed that.At least the brakes were good (in '69).
__________________
'69 GMC C2500 Custom Camper, 8 1/2' bed, New GM 350, NP 435 Close Ratio 4spd. Trans., 3.73 Dana-60 open.Camper and Trailer wiring, PS, PB, AC, tach , three gas tanks, stereo speakers, 2nd owner, Work-Truck supreme.
WorkinLonghorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2007, 09:26 AM   #8
67ChevyRedneck
Hittin E-Z Street on Mud Tires
 
67ChevyRedneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 23,090
Re: Consumer Reports "1974 Buying Guide" and our trucks

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ackattack View Post
Kinda off the subject, but I hate consumer reports and their reports on vehicles. I think they're the number one reason why people continue to tought Japanese cars. Don't get me wrong the jap cars are good cars, but I think that many american cars are just as good, if not better than the jap cars. Yet consumer reports continues the stereo type japanese cars as super quality and then dog on the american cars. The other day I was looking through it and they they rated the New Tunda's "predicted reliability" as good or excellent...something like that. Then the "predicted reliability" of the new '07 chevy/gmc was "too new to tell" or something like that.

I'm sorry, but the new Tundra has a completly new engine. Yet the GM offerings essentially have the same engines as the previous body style.

This is just one example of there bias towards the Japanese cars. Just my opinion.

I HATE CR as well. Look at the Matrix vs Vibe ratings... funny as hell, you'd never know they were the same car. The Pontiac version is rated as marginal while the Toyota version is a top pick.

I don't bother to read CR anymore. Waste of time. Looking at these ratings they didn't think too highly of our trucks either. They gave the straight sixes a horrible rating yet 40 years later there are many still running.

I have a new slogan for them:

Consumer Reports, improperly rating vehicles for 40 years and proud of it
__________________
Jesse James
1967 C10 SWB Stepside: 350/700R4/3.73
1965 Ford Mustang: 289/T5-5spd/3.25 Trac-Loc
1968 Pontiac Firebird: Project Fire Chicken!
2015 Silverado Double Cab 5.3L Z71
2001 Jeep Wrangler Sport 4.0L 5spd
2020 Chevrolet Equinox Premium 2.0L Turbo
2011 Mustang V6 ~ Wife's ride
American Born, Country by the Grace of God
1967 CST Shop Truck Rebuild!
My 1967 C-10 Build Thread
My Vintage Air A/C Install
Project "On a Dime"
Trying my hand at Home Renovation!
1965 Mustang Modifications!

Last edited by 67ChevyRedneck; 10-05-2007 at 09:27 AM.
67ChevyRedneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2007, 09:42 AM   #9
AlienYouth
Registered User
 
AlienYouth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Westminster, Maryland
Posts: 411
Re: Consumer Reports "1974 Buying Guide" and our trucks

actually, corvette rates really low, look at the other page he posted : )
__________________
Picturesss
71 C10 383/TH400
13.65 @ 99... 2.06 60' spinnin :/
AlienYouth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2007, 09:56 AM   #10
Orange
Licensed to Thrill!
 
Orange's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northwest, GA
Posts: 1,673
Re: Consumer Reports "1974 Buying Guide" and our trucks

Corvette.

I love the newer 'Vettes, but those old ones sure weren't much to write home about. (In the way of their mechanical reliability, etc.)

DLB
__________________
1971 GMC.Lowered. Overdrive. Orange.
Krue's excellent FAQ Index.

Last edited by Orange; 10-05-2007 at 09:57 AM.
Orange is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2007, 11:04 AM   #11
Zonaman
Registered User
 
Zonaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 519
Re: Consumer Reports "1974 Buying Guide" and our trucks

Quote:
Originally Posted by 67ChevyRedneck View Post
I HATE CR as well. Look at the Matrix vs Vibe ratings... funny as hell, you'd never know they were the same car. The Pontiac version is rated as marginal while the Toyota version is a top pick.

I don't bother to read CR anymore. Waste of time. Looking at these ratings they didn't think too highly of our trucks either. They gave the straight sixes a horrible rating yet 40 years later there are many still running.

I have a new slogan for them:

Consumer Reports, improperly rating vehicles for 40 years and proud of it
I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who feels this way! But then what do you expect from a guy like Ralph Nadar? He started it with Unsafe at Any Speed which slammed the Corvair out of existance. Meanwhile the VW, essentially the same car, gets a pass (at least for a while). They've had anti-American bias from day one!
__________________
69 C-10 LWB, 350, 700r4, 3.73 posi-traction, front disc brakes. Built for the desert- She can take the heat! Vivat Rex Chevus!
Zonaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2007, 11:24 AM   #12
67ChevyRedneck
Hittin E-Z Street on Mud Tires
 
67ChevyRedneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 23,090
Re: Consumer Reports "1974 Buying Guide" and our trucks

My future father in law was a huge CR advocate a few years ago (been with my chick for 4 years) and he's also a toyota nut (bugs the hell out of me about it) but even he finally stopped buying CR after they bought SEVERAL new (and expensive) appliances that were highly rated that failed within a year of purchase.
__________________
Jesse James
1967 C10 SWB Stepside: 350/700R4/3.73
1965 Ford Mustang: 289/T5-5spd/3.25 Trac-Loc
1968 Pontiac Firebird: Project Fire Chicken!
2015 Silverado Double Cab 5.3L Z71
2001 Jeep Wrangler Sport 4.0L 5spd
2020 Chevrolet Equinox Premium 2.0L Turbo
2011 Mustang V6 ~ Wife's ride
American Born, Country by the Grace of God
1967 CST Shop Truck Rebuild!
My 1967 C-10 Build Thread
My Vintage Air A/C Install
Project "On a Dime"
Trying my hand at Home Renovation!
1965 Mustang Modifications!
67ChevyRedneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2007, 03:00 PM   #13
Ackattack
Senior Member
 
Ackattack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Valley Center KS
Posts: 3,524
Re: Consumer Reports "1974 Buying Guide" and our trucks

Quote:
Originally Posted by 67ChevyRedneck View Post
I HATE CR as well. Look at the Matrix vs Vibe ratings... funny as hell, you'd never know they were the same car. The Pontiac version is rated as marginal while the Toyota version is a top pick.

I don't bother to read CR anymore. Waste of time. Looking at these ratings they didn't think too highly of our trucks either. They gave the straight sixes a horrible rating yet 40 years later there are many still running.

I have a new slogan for them:

Consumer Reports, improperly rating vehicles for 40 years and proud of it
That's kinda funny and pathetic at the same time. And exactly proves my point.
Ackattack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com