The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1969 - 1972 Blazers and Jimmys Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-16-2007, 05:27 PM   #1
mister.freeze
Registered User
 
mister.freeze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 734
to carb or not to carb?

OK, I've had Holley's ProJection 2d TBI for the better part of 10 years on the Fox's 383 stroker. I've run it in both big an small block mode, with and without the closed-loop O2 sensor. I just feel that I've never gotten the best out of the stroker. The mpg has settled in at about 9.16, with or without tail/headwind, up/downhill, trailer or not, top on/off. ANYBODY have an idea what cfm a motor like that needs? The ProJection is rated at 650. It's been VERY reliable and works well, but I know there's more to be had out of my motor, especially in the mpg department. Should I carb? Go propane? Leave it alone? I'd LOVE to go diesel...
__________________
'72 K5, known as 'the Fox.'
mister.freeze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2007, 06:06 PM   #2
72cheyennesuper20
Registered User
 
72cheyennesuper20's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland, OR.
Posts: 414
Re: to carb or not to carb?

I'd love for you to put a Duramax in your truck so I could follow the build and do it to my truck. I am suprised that youi are not happy with the projection, I wanted to do it to my truck. But maybe not now.
72cheyennesuper20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2007, 08:57 PM   #3
ClassicJimmy
FNG to resto/mod world!
 
ClassicJimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Spokane, Wa
Posts: 196
Re: to carb or not to carb?

I was thinking of going that route too. Does anyone have a 383 stroker carbed, what carb, & what's your average mpg? I'd like to build mine as a daily driver, but I need to have decent mpgs at todays prices or I'll have to get a second job to pay for gas! I thought diesel was the way to go, but now diesel is almost a dollar more than regular - go figure! Propane might be the way to go - does anyone have that setup? I'm interested to hear what you fellas have to say!
__________________
71 GMC Jimmy - under construction
75 GMC K25 Sierra Grande - under deconstruction
92 Chevy K2500 ECSB - sold
04 Nissan Titan ECSB Off Road - sold & missed
13 Ford F-150 Ecoboost (work truck) - sold
16 Ford F-150 Ecoboost (work truck)
ClassicJimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 12:51 AM   #4
vtblazer
Registered User
 
vtblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Vermont
Posts: 8,538
Re: to carb or not to carb?

If your looking for mileage, install an older style 6.2 diesel, their as close as you'll get to 'bolt in'.
You could average from high teens to better than 20mpg with one with the right gearing.

I'm currently running an injected 383 myself but it's not in a driver per say, so I have no idea of the fuel mileage.
It is in my off road ride and it runs very sweet with tons of power on demand.

The difference from your set up is that I'm running a chevy TBI that's been chipped, otherwise stock.
I think a larger throttle body would improve performance, so might larger injectors over 4000rpm but currently it runs good enough.

As for mileage in these beast's, remember your pushing a brick through the wind and that getting better fuel mileage is more a function of having an over drive transmission than having injection on the motor.

Last edited by vtblazer; 12-17-2007 at 12:53 AM.
vtblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 07:16 AM   #5
mister.freeze
Registered User
 
mister.freeze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 734
Re: to carb or not to carb?

don't get me wrong; I've been very satisfied with the ProJection. I just don't think the programmed maps are optimal for a 383 stroker. Other things come into play to: I've got 10.21:1 compression and I have to WAY retard the timing for daily use. I do have a 700r4, and a torque converter lock, but none of that has helped in the MPG. I built it because of the speeding brick effect, thinking more horses would work less hard and sip rather than gulp fuel. I'd like to try a carb, but finding a loaner is dicey. My Projection may end up on a shelf soon one way or another...
__________________
'72 K5, known as 'the Fox.'
mister.freeze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 06:41 PM   #6
Critter
Future TOTM Winner
 
Critter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bulverde, TX
Posts: 2,692
Re: to carb or not to carb?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mister.freeze View Post
don't get me wrong; I've been very satisfied with the ProJection. I just don't think the programmed maps are optimal for a 383 stroker. Other things come into play to: I've got 10.21:1 compression and I have to WAY retard the timing for daily use. I do have a 700r4, and a torque converter lock, but none of that has helped in the MPG. I built it because of the speeding brick effect, thinking more horses would work less hard and sip rather than gulp fuel. I'd like to try a carb, but finding a loaner is dicey. My Projection may end up on a shelf soon one way or another...
Just curious, what gears and tire size are you running?
__________________
72 Chevy CST K5 HIGHLANDER BLAZER Getting a 6.0,NV4500,NP205,14BFF (Currently laying all over the place in little pieces)
72 Chevy swb step-side "LS" 6.0 Here's a build thread of sorts
2002 HD2500 Crew Cab, 8.1L Allison 4x4 Daily Driver

Check it out www.lsdyno.com

Last edited by Critter; 12-17-2007 at 06:44 PM.
Critter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2007, 02:13 AM   #7
mister.freeze
Registered User
 
mister.freeze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 734
Re: to carb or not to carb?

3.73 gears and 33x12.5's.
__________________
'72 K5, known as 'the Fox.'
mister.freeze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2007, 02:38 AM   #8
vtblazer
Registered User
 
vtblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Vermont
Posts: 8,538
Re: to carb or not to carb?

IMO, it's the motor.
Being built for power, not fuel economy.

Does seem like it could be better with that gear/tire/ combo though.
vtblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2007, 05:48 AM   #9
Jtrux
I'm a poor spectator
 
Jtrux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Antonio, Tx
Posts: 2,287
Re: to carb or not to carb?

I don't think mileage will ever get any better, however, you might be able to eek out some more power with a carb if your having trouble with adjustability right now. It seems to me though that keeping with the FI would be the best bet. Have you called holley to get there input??
__________________
2006 Jeep Unlimited IMPACT ORANGE

1993 Chevy 2500 4x4 ExCab LWB 454/NV4500 Tow rig

1977 Ford F100 2x4 LWB 1st truck I owned, still have it!!!

1979 Ford F150 4x4 SWB Built Ford Tough!!!

1971 Chevy Blazer 350 / SM465 / NP205 UNDER CONSTRUCTION Soon to have a LQ4 6.0!!!
Jtrux is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com