The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-05-2008, 08:15 AM   #1
Brock
upgrading to an older model
 
Brock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sacramento, KY
Posts: 346
electric fan v/s motor driven

I've heard that using an electric fan instead of the motor driven will increase horsepower...Actually I think the theory is it decreases the horsepower lost to resistance created by the motor having to turn the fan. Either way there is supposed to be a gain in HP. Has anyone heard of this? If so how much HP do you think would be gained? (350 c.i. SBC +.030)
__________________
68 stepside, short-box, multi-colored (for now)
Brock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2008, 08:36 AM   #2
Wasted Income
Boosted Member
 
Wasted Income's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Mackinaw, IL
Posts: 2,200
Re: electric fan v/s motor driven

You're on teh right path. An electric fan will free up some hp from parasitic losses, and will only come on when needed (via a thermostat). I'm pretty sure HotRod or some other car rag did a test on this not too long ago. I think the ballpark was 5-7 more hp by going to an electric fan vs. a NON clutched fan.

This will put an increased load on your charging system and the alternator will be slightly more parasitic to create the extra electrical power.
__________________
1972 2wd K/5 Blazer Turbocharged 370 LSx - 941 rwhp / 1093 rwtq
1969 Chevy K-10 L33 5.3 / 4L80E / NP241 / 4" lift
1964 Buick Skylark Twin TURBO 383 LS pro-touring project
2014 VW Passat TDI - Daily Driver
Turbo diesel
2015 Sierra Denali HD Duramax Turbo diesel
2016 Ford Explorer Sport - Twin Turbskis
2017 Polaris RZR Turbo
2014 Nor-Tech Center Console - Twin Supercharged Outboards

TURBO ALL THE THINGS!!
Wasted Income is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2008, 09:10 AM   #3
Brock
upgrading to an older model
 
Brock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sacramento, KY
Posts: 346
Re: electric fan v/s motor driven

Actually I'm gonna use this set-up on my dirt-track car...no alternator, gonna run it off a seperate battery with a simple on/off switch
__________________
68 stepside, short-box, multi-colored (for now)
Brock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2008, 04:29 PM   #4
69C10@16
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Greenfield, MO
Posts: 215
Re: electric fan v/s motor driven

..........

no

..........

alternator????????

69C10@16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2008, 05:32 PM   #5
Brock
upgrading to an older model
 
Brock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sacramento, KY
Posts: 346
Re: electric fan v/s motor driven

2 batteries...one for the motor and one for the fan. Not to mention I can arrange them to provide weight where needed
__________________
68 stepside, short-box, multi-colored (for now)
Brock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 08:24 AM   #6
Scott68-93-97
Registered User
 
Scott68-93-97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Fair Oaks, CA
Posts: 475
Re: electric fan v/s motor driven

clutch fans rob nothing until it gets hot enough then they can rob like the flex ones do which is around 20hp they did a test a year or so ago in chevy high performance so an electric fan does free up a little power but when on your alternator will have a little more draw on the motor but not enough to notice.
__________________
1968 Short Fleet 350/700r4
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=249435
1997 Bagged XtdCab Vortec350/4L60e
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...44#post2286144

1993 XtdCab Longbed 4x4 6.5Turbo/NV4500 "Daily Driver"

1985 Toyota XtdCab 4x4 22re/W-56/Dual T-cases, Doug Thorley Header, Homebrew front and rear spring packs, Tons of Mods to suspension and drivetrain, 35" boggers, coming soon ARB's and 5.29's, Possible 4.3/700r4 swap
Scott68-93-97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 12:05 PM   #7
crazy longhorn
Fabricate till you "puke"
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ill
Posts: 9,403
Re: electric fan v/s motor driven

There is no such thing as "free lunch", when it comes to horse power. I run a dual elect fan setup on my longhorn, & it works great.....but it never runs wide open for more than about a 1/4 mile at a time(once in a while) On your dirt car, you will twist it what 6500-7000,burp it , then twist it back up down the next straight......how many laps? I can keep my streeter cool on a on a 2700 cfm fan setup, but it will take a lot of fan to cool that dirt track car running wide open for several laps.....I wont say cant.....cause if you are anything like this crazy old fart, the answer will be "watch me do it"! best of luck, crazyL
__________________
69 longhorn,4" chop,3/5 drop, 1/2 ton suspension/disc brakes,1 1/2" body drop,steel tilt clip, 5.3/Edelbrock rpm intake/600 carb, Hooker streetrod shorties,2 1/2" exhaust/ H pipe/50's Flows , 6 spd Richmond trans,12 bolt/ 3.40 gears....
crazy longhorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 12:13 PM   #8
piecesparts
Parts and more parts
 
piecesparts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lebo, Kansas (middle of nowhere
Posts: 6,821
Re: electric fan v/s motor driven

The average is around 5 to 7 horses freed up for the engine to apply elsewhere. You could also see an increase in fuel economy (I did on my trucks -- about a mile per gallon) and you will see a smoother running engine with that load removed. My DD warms up faster in the winter, also.
piecesparts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 07:42 PM   #9
Brock
upgrading to an older model
 
Brock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sacramento, KY
Posts: 346
Re: electric fan v/s motor driven

Sounds to me like there are advantages all around, more HP and better gas milage. I'll definitly look into going that route when/if I ever get the '68 going.

I turn around 5500rpm in my car at the end of the straight. my nephew popped his engine at 6400 (you could put your fist in the cylinder chamber through the side) so I try to not go that high. We run 7 green flag laps. it might take 25 laps to get those 7 in (caution laps don't count, and I don't think the flag guy counts too good...sometimes it seems longer/shorter). I don't know the CFM of the fan(s) actually there are two. I'm planning on wiring them through switches where I can turn them on and off as needed based on temp. Here's what the fans look like
Attached Images
 
__________________
68 stepside, short-box, multi-colored (for now)
Brock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 04:26 AM   #10
ChevyC102007
Registered User
 
ChevyC102007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Emporium,Pa
Posts: 248
Re: electric fan v/s motor driven

Ok I can understand the HP/ mileage increase of the electric fans. But IMO if ya wanted to decrease even more parasiti power loss wouldnt it make sense to also run an electric water pump? Or under/overdrive pulleys? I guess Im not understanding just stopping at the electric fan solution. Im sure Ill get flamed for this post and I dont mean to step all over the original post but its just my opinion.
__________________
"When you were born, you cried and the world rejoiced.
Live your life so that when you die, the world cries and you rejoice."
[Cherokee saying]



2001 Dodge Ram Sport 1500 4x4. (old ride)
1987 GMC V1500 Sierra Classic ("new" ride)
ChevyC102007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 08:11 AM   #11
piecesparts
Parts and more parts
 
piecesparts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lebo, Kansas (middle of nowhere
Posts: 6,821
Re: electric fan v/s motor driven

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChevyC102007 View Post
Ok I can understand the HP/ mileage increase of the electric fans. But IMO if ya wanted to decrease even more parasiti power loss wouldnt it make sense to also run an electric water pump? Or under/overdrive pulleys? I guess Im not understanding just stopping at the electric fan solution. Im sure Ill get flamed for this post and I dont mean to step all over the original post but its just my opinion.
There is a breakover point on parasitic items. You have to consider the amount of increase of electrical use you would have and the extra drag you would have on the 140 amp alternator needed for the electrical load. The alternator is ONLY cutting a magnetic field, but the field is resultant of the load needed to cover ALL of the items used. The electric water pump would be great and many drag cars and some show cars use them, but there is a relability factor here. Can you get one on the road to Tulsa or Victorville, when you break one? At least most of the local parts stores carry the belt driven ones.
piecesparts is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com