Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-26-2003, 01:31 AM | #1 |
Gotta Startem Early
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Amarillo, TX, USA
Posts: 364
|
Dont cricify me, Im just a messenger
CAUTION: I do not condone this in any way.
A lot of people have posted threads on later model stepside beds with a lot of criticism for the mismatching fender wells. I was noticing today that the mid 80 to early 90 F*** flareside bed had rounded fender wells and body lines similar to the late model Chevy stepside beds. I am no PhotShop expert but I did do a little cut and paste maybe someone else can do better. Just an idea for those nonconformists.
__________________
67 SWB In Progress, one piece at a time, maybe 3 years I will be finished |
02-26-2003, 04:04 AM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: From Chicago, Live in Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,802
|
Actually, I think the body lines on a newer chevy stepside line up better than the Ford bed.
|
02-26-2003, 07:50 AM | #3 |
State of Confusion!
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gulfport, MS USA
Posts: 47,216
|
I was just thinking about that last night on the way home when one of the F@#d steps pulled up beside me. Like 68 Suburban said, it looks like the step plate area is lower than the later GMs and might not line up as well. I was curious about the differences in bed mounting though at how feasible it might really be.
Hey adamls great minds think alike...even when we go wayward at times.
__________________
Bill 1970 Chevy Custom/10 LWB Fleetside 2010 Toyota Tacoma PreRunner SR5 Double Cab - DD Member of Louisiana Classic Truck Club (LCTC) Bill's Gallery Life isn't tied with a bow, but it's still a gift. Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God! |
02-26-2003, 08:51 AM | #4 |
1969 Custom 30 wrecker
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Pottsville, Pa
Posts: 2,611
|
No offense but this just isn't right no matter what you use. An old truck will never "look" right with anything than what was originally on it. Keep you old GM all old GM! LOL
Just my opinion...
__________________
Bob 63 Impala 283/PG/3.36 (under restoration) 66 Impala 327/PG/3.36 66 Chevelle SS 409/M22/3.55 69 Chevelle 307/PG/3.08 (future restoration) 69 C10 short stepside 454/TH350/3.73 69 Custom 30 tow truck 350/4 spd/4.10 (resto done, CRUISIN TIME!) 71 Cheyenne 20 fleetside 350/4 spd/4.10 71 Chevelle 6/PG/3.08 72 Chevelle 454/M21/4.10 |
02-26-2003, 11:08 AM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: West Fork, Arkansas - Razorback Country
Posts: 1,826
|
Hmmm...raise that lower line up just a bit and it would look pretty nice. Although its still the same ol story here...this will only look "right" it its your ride and it's what YOU want to do.
__________________
Smooth68's Web Site WTB 64-66 project or frame/cab, SWB or LWB...I have the fever! Whatcha got?? '68 Short Step - Shaved Body, Soon Bagged - SOLD Driver-2004 GMC Z-71 Ext-cab |
02-26-2003, 03:23 PM | #6 |
senior member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort macleod alberta
Posts: 2,770
|
sont think anyone would want to put a ford bed on their chev. sounds about as brilliant as my friend who wants to put as cobra in his grandpas 65 jackass i told him
__________________
69 GMC bagged |
02-26-2003, 06:22 PM | #7 |
Formerly yellow72custom
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 7,531
|
The only stepside bed that looks right on these trucks is the original ones. The only exterior mods i really like is a nice cowl hood, 1-piece windows, and maybe a body drop. I think the newer beds lookd good on newer trucks, and chop-tops make me sick....lol but its your truck. It would get a lot of looks though
__________________
'72 Chevy C10 Mild 350/TH350/3.07. Ochre/White. Old high school ride. '70 GMC C2500 '62 327 4bbl/SM465/4.56-geared Dana 60. White/White. Project or parts truck. '97 Saturn SL DD. 1.9/5-speed. 40+ highway mpg |
02-26-2003, 07:20 PM | #8 |
Fabricate till you "puke"
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ill
Posts: 9,402
|
I ressemble that slam on chopped top trucks!
__________________
69 longhorn,4" chop,3/5 drop, 1/2 ton suspension/disc brakes,1 1/2" body drop,steel tilt clip, 5.3/Edelbrock rpm intake/600 carb, Hooker streetrod shorties,2 1/2" exhaust/ H pipe/50's Flows , 6 spd Richmond trans,12 bolt/ 3.40 gears.... |
02-26-2003, 07:21 PM | #9 |
Gotta Startem Early
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Amarillo, TX, USA
Posts: 364
|
pissonNOS
I have seen many people do many things that would be considered different. Including 9" Ford rear ends under chevys and chevy engines in old Ford metal. Just because its different doesnt mean that no one wants to, has done or has thought of doin something in the past. I know I am not building my truck for others, only for myself and my tastes. Saying that I will still not put a Ford bed on my truck, just a thought for those out there looking for something outside the norm.
__________________
67 SWB In Progress, one piece at a time, maybe 3 years I will be finished |
02-26-2003, 08:02 PM | #10 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,991
|
ahhhhhh, you Fordenized it!!!!!!!!!
|
03-01-2003, 08:00 PM | #11 |
Currently Blazerless
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: St. Joseph Mo.
Posts: 4,828
|
I saw this post awhile back and it reminded me of a truck I saw in Topeka Ks in the mid 90s when I had a 66 chevy 4x4, took me some time to dig out the pics and scan them but here they are, I dont really like mismatching parts myself but I thought this truck looked right this way, early 80s ford bed on a 66.
__________________
1972 C/30 133" W.B. C&C 1970 GMC 3500 157" W.B. single wheel C&C |
03-01-2003, 08:01 PM | #12 |
Currently Blazerless
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: St. Joseph Mo.
Posts: 4,828
|
pic 2
__________________
1972 C/30 133" W.B. C&C 1970 GMC 3500 157" W.B. single wheel C&C |
03-01-2003, 08:06 PM | #13 |
Currently Blazerless
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: St. Joseph Mo.
Posts: 4,828
|
last one
__________________
1972 C/30 133" W.B. C&C 1970 GMC 3500 157" W.B. single wheel C&C |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|