01-06-2012, 12:06 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Alabama
Posts: 68
|
A Cam question
What kind of sound would this cam have at idle??
Cam Style Hydraulic flat tappet Basic Operating RPM Range 2,500-6,800 Intake Duration at 050 inch Lift 234 Exhaust Duration at 050 inch Lift 234 Duration at 050 inch Lift 234 int./234 exh. Advertised Intake Duration 278 Advertised Exhaust Duration 278 Advertised Duration 278 int./278 exh. Intake Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio 0.450 in. Exhaust Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio 0.450 Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio 0.450 int./0.450 exh. Lobe Separation (degrees) 106 Grind Number 278 Mega |
01-06-2012, 12:54 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 917
|
Re: A Cam question
OK, I'll bite. It would be lumpy with that tight lobe separation and 234 @ .050
Not radical but might want a little looser converter if going in an automatic. A little might depend on where the manufacturer, or you, put the intake center line during installation. Also, the bigger the engine, the more mild the cam will act. |
01-06-2012, 02:24 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Alabama
Posts: 68
|
Re: A Cam question
Thanks Speedbump... I know we dont choose a cam based on sound in the perfect world of engine building, but honestly I'm not after a "fast" motor in this application just something that sounds kinda "old school"
If I may ask, what do any of you think about this one as well? RPM Range 1800 - 6500 Duration @ .050 Lift 224 / 234 deg int/exh Valve Lift .465 in / .488 in int/exh Lobe Separation 112 deg Advance 5 deg |
01-06-2012, 03:02 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 549
|
Re: A Cam question
I would go your 2nd option, its a little tamer & believe me you would be better off with more torque= better drivability.
|
01-06-2012, 03:59 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Alabama
Posts: 68
|
Re: A Cam question
Thanks Red Foreman, How do you think the second option would sound in a 305
|
01-06-2012, 04:56 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 549
|
Re: A Cam question
It would be a nice camshaft with lope at idle in a 305 but I would still go one stage smaller depending on what you expect from your engine. I have built my fair share of sbc's & ran larger than needed camshafts only to go back change it out for a smaller less aggressive profile.
|
01-06-2012, 06:00 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 917
|
Re: A Cam question
Who doesn't select cams because of the idle??? You're talking to the wrong guy. I build hot rods and they need to sound like hot rods! I'll give up a little on the bottom for the sound at the cruise in. Just be aware of some tweaking you might need to do, like the converter. My 27 roadster has a small block Ford with a solid roller and 243 @ .050 and a tunnel ram with two 390 Holleys on top of that....and it works in an automatic...the solid thing is because I got so tired of these Ford guys with their Cobra valve covers and those pukey hydraulic cams. If it says Cobra, it should sound like Cobra. The 55 PU I'm building now has a 505 BBC with a Comp Big Mutha Thumper roller and a tunnel ram with 2 Fast Throttle bodies. It sound pretty sweet on the test stand and I can't wait to do the first cruise. IMO, go for it and use the 1st one and put the ICL at 104-106 degrees. That will give back a little bottom but won't wipe the smile off your face. Life is too short for a girlie cam!
|
01-06-2012, 08:41 PM | #8 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 549
|
Re: A Cam question
Quote:
I for one don't select camshafts on how they sound, I select them on HP/TQ & matching them too the rest of the engine components, driveline & vehicle. I guess I'm getting more conservative with age! "I like girlie cams" |
|
01-06-2012, 09:15 PM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Alabama
Posts: 68
|
Re: A Cam question
I have a stock 305 with the exception of being bored .040 over. I am guilty of the same as Speedbump. I like the thump. I'll be running a 350 trans 3:42 gear. Truck will be used for occasional driving. But I still want to make the best choice for all around use. I have learned that small sacrifices (like cam sound) pay off in the long run.
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|