The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-06-2012, 03:57 PM   #15
raceman6135
Dino burner
 
raceman6135's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 602
Re: Extreme Crankcase Vacuum: Yes or No?

In theory, the K&N-style breather you have on the driver's side valve cover should flow more than enough air.

Is that filtre plugged? Is there something inside the grommet that is preventing air to flow into the crankcase? I've seen instances where a closed grommet (one that is supposed to be cut open to the proper size by the end user) was used in error, which prevented airflow.

As for which way is better between a stand-alone breather or one that is plumbed into the bottom of the Moroso filtre housing, I think it's just a matter of preference.

With the tube connected to the inside of the filtre housing, any excessive oil mist (blow-by) that the PCV system cannot handle will be deposited inside the air filtre housing. With the open breather, the oil mist accumulates on the top of the valve cover, making it look messy.
raceman6135 is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com