The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board > projects and builds

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-12-2012, 09:48 PM   #1
duallyjams
Registered User
 
duallyjams's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Deale Md
Posts: 4,663
Re: Project Goldilocks, '66 C10 SWB BBW Build

Nothing beats cubic dollars. A high horse power L6 would be cool but you have to work with in your budget and sometimes compromise.
__________________
James

63 GMC V6 4speed carryall
65 chevy swb bbw V8 auto
68 K20 327/4 speed, buddy buckets
2002 GMC CC Dually Duramax

64 GMC lwb 3/4 V6 4speed SOLD
66 GMC swb bbw buddy buckets SOLD

IG duallyjams

The only thing that stays the same is constant change!
duallyjams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2012, 10:10 PM   #2
theastronaut
Registered User
 
theastronaut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Anderson SC
Posts: 3,876
Re: Project Goldilocks, '66 C10 SWB BBW Build

Quote:
Originally Posted by duallyjams View Post
Nothing beats cubic dollars. A high horse power L6 would be cool but you have to work with in your budget and sometimes compromise.
I'd still go with the six if it could be reliably built to around 350hp even if it cost more, but the guys on the inliners forum didn't think it would work. It wouldn't be much fun to drive with only 275 hp and the suspension and brakes to handle a good bit more. The V8 would be way more fun to drive and sound better too.
Posted via Mobile Device
theastronaut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2012, 10:57 PM   #3
duallyjams
Registered User
 
duallyjams's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Deale Md
Posts: 4,663
Re: Project Goldilocks, '66 C10 SWB BBW Build

Well then build the 6 like you want just because those other folks don't think it will work doesn't mean that it won't work case in point I built a 400 smblk with the stock cast crank that everyone said you can not turn it above 6grand and that it would not last well it was my daily driver and i use turn it 7200 and never had a problem so all the na sayers were wrong oh and this was in a 4x4 that also used for the street stock class truck pull 6500 pound sled.
__________________
James

63 GMC V6 4speed carryall
65 chevy swb bbw V8 auto
68 K20 327/4 speed, buddy buckets
2002 GMC CC Dually Duramax

64 GMC lwb 3/4 V6 4speed SOLD
66 GMC swb bbw buddy buckets SOLD

IG duallyjams

The only thing that stays the same is constant change!
duallyjams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2012, 02:44 PM   #4
McMurphy
Registered User
 
McMurphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 2,425
Re: Project Goldilocks, '66 C10 SWB BBW Build

I have to agree with Duallyjams... build what you want, and tweak it to how you want it.
I wanted a "Sprint" engine for my Tempest, but they are getting harder and harder to find, so I had a stock 230 rebuilt into a Sprint. A $150 engine turned into a $3,000 rebuild. But it was what I wanted, and it will get it's first showing this summer.

Good luck on whatever you decide though, your process is immaculate and no doubt the end result will be well received no matter which path you take!
__________________
Michael McMurphy

My 66 Stepside
My 64 Tow Truck
My 66 Tempest

Table Of Contents Added to Page1
McMurphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2012, 10:31 PM   #5
chevyrestoguy
Registered User
 
chevyrestoguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: apple valley, ca
Posts: 2,670
Re: Project Goldilocks, '66 C10 SWB BBW Build

John-
I had some reservations about the 6 right from the start. In order for you to achieve your horsepower and E.T. goals, it was going to have to be a pretty radical 6 cylinder. Radical can oftentimes mean temperamental, and that's no fun. I really like the idea of a LS engine. Those things make great power, don't leak, and get great mileage when coupled with the right components. Don't overlook the 4.8, you can find those engines CHEAP, oftentimes 1/3rd the cost of a 5.3.

I like the old straight 6 engines, but when you were wanting to go 13:1 on compression, I got worried. Even with good gas, a slight error on the tune can lead to severe death rattle (detonation) and that'll waste the rod bearings in a hurry.
__________________
Check out my latest endeavor:
https://roundsixpod.com

My build threads:
'55 Chevy: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=247512

'64 C-20: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=446527
chevyrestoguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2012, 07:57 PM   #6
litew8
Registered User
 
litew8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 3,016
Re: Project Goldilocks, '66 C10 SWB BBW Build

Quote:
Originally Posted by chevyrestoguy View Post
I really like the idea of a LS engine. Those things make great power, don't leak, and get great mileage when coupled with the right components.
Personally, I know nothing of LS engines. Someone once mentioned to me that they do tend to leak.
__________________
project: "my happy mess"
litew8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com