02-02-2014, 01:03 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Olathe, Kansas
Posts: 174
|
Sleeper Truck
So boys I think, I have changed my mind on what I want to do on my truck aka Orgasmic Ebony. I am still going to put the 67 front end on it and leave the rest of the body the same and build a pretty fast Dart small block.
What do guys think |
02-02-2014, 08:15 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Chesapeake, Va
Posts: 1,275
|
Re: Sleeper Truck
not a fan of the dart heads, i think they are more or less a stock replacement with a little improvement,
I would go with a trick flow or AFR head depends on the budget also If you are going cast iron, GM vortecs do pretty well also
__________________
Mike 72 C-10 Cheyenne off frame resto and Upgraded to 4 wheel disk, Tilt, Dakota Digital Dash / Rear slider. 421 SBC / TH350 3000RPM Stall Progression Ignition /Holley 750 DP/3:73 gear Eaton Limited Slip unit / 2 1/2 exhaust glasspacks |
02-02-2014, 09:48 AM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 644
|
Re: Sleeper Truck
X2.... AFR fan myself
|
02-02-2014, 10:07 AM | #4 |
Special Order
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,851
|
Re: Sleeper Truck
Tell us more about the truck. Mostly,what will you do to "hide" the powerhouse within. Other words,what will be so "sleeper" about it? You say "Dart engine" so I'm seeing much more than heads here. I guess people have their preferences,but I see people get gobs of power from engines using Dart heads. And,since you're asking what we think about making your truck a sleeper,no matter what we think of your choice in heads,I say GO FOR IT!
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ |
02-02-2014, 10:10 AM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Southern Ohio
Posts: 292
|
Re: Sleeper Truck
If you're open to a less traditional option, look into an LS. There's a reason everyone is running them now....they make so much effortless power its like cheating.
|
02-02-2014, 11:15 AM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Mickleton, NJ
Posts: 1,776
|
Re: Sleeper Truck
My truck is kind of a sleeper right now, all dented and ugly, dog dish hubcaps, rusty mismatched tailgate. 382 HP and a TREMEC 5-speed underneath. The only giveaway is the exhaust sound.
If its what you want, go for it. Just do your homework on how you want to make the power. I went with a Vortec head crate engine, and I really like the very flat torque curve I have.
__________________
Shawn 1970 Chevy C-10 SWB, 350, TKO 600 5 speed My build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=559881 |
02-02-2014, 12:02 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: ravenwood, mo
Posts: 709
|
Re: Sleeper Truck
If your basically starting from scratch on a motor, I vote BBC and don't look back!
|
02-02-2014, 12:56 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Olathe, Kansas
Posts: 174
|
Re: Sleeper Truck
Oh sorry guys, I didn't clarify what I meant was a Dart Little M bare, but a 502 bare does sound tempting two.
|
02-02-2014, 01:02 PM | #9 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Olathe, Kansas
Posts: 174
|
Re: Sleeper Truck
Quote:
To me it will look like a "project" truck, to me which rich kids under estimate. |
|
02-02-2014, 01:07 PM | #10 |
Special Order
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,851
|
Re: Sleeper Truck
Gotcha. Sounds cool.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ |
02-02-2014, 06:31 PM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Poconos Pa.
Posts: 29
|
Re: Sleeper Truck
4.8 5.3 turbo. Hard to out run technology. That is just my opinion.
|
02-03-2014, 12:44 PM | #12 |
Special Order
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,851
|
Re: Sleeper Truck
^ I guess we need another 40 years to prove that ^
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ |
02-03-2014, 12:52 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Orem, Utah
Posts: 7,976
|
Re: Sleeper Truck
|
02-03-2014, 01:38 PM | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Olathe, Kansas
Posts: 174
|
Re: Sleeper Truck
|
02-03-2014, 06:07 PM | #15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: tucson,az
Posts: 274
|
Re: Sleeper Truck
a 6.0 carbed ls motor will be 400 hp at the wheels, run cool all day long and idle nice. I dont think you can build a sbc with that horsepower cheaper. and it wont be near as smooth. For a long time sbc 350 and its variants were THE MOTOR. now its the new SBC, the LS.
|
02-04-2014, 10:00 AM | #16 |
Special Order
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,851
|
Re: Sleeper Truck
Some prefer to "build" their motors as it's been with hot rodders from day-1. Some prefer to look under the hood and see a motor that says "hot rod" and not one that says "I belong in a modern car". To each their own,but for me an LS/computer/electronic O/D trans belongs in a daily driver. If I lived where I could drive my old truck year round it would be my daily driver. For fun and cool factor the older motors will never be "out"
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ |
02-04-2014, 12:12 PM | #17 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Olathe, Kansas
Posts: 174
|
Re: Sleeper Truck
Quote:
|
|
02-04-2014, 01:45 PM | #18 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: tucson,az
Posts: 274
|
Re: Sleeper Truck
I don't want to get into a versus argument just saying its got possibilities and can be configured multiple ways. If done right it looks very retro. AC and 20+mpg with an overdrive.
Does this one look out of place? open minds is all |
02-04-2014, 02:07 PM | #19 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Olathe, Kansas
Posts: 174
|
Re: Sleeper Truck
Ok I see your point, I'm not trying to be bias
|
02-04-2014, 03:13 PM | #20 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Southern Ohio
Posts: 292
|
Re: Sleeper Truck
I'm gonna disagree. The old small block is quickly becoming your fathers Flathead Ford. Great for nostalgia, but if you want power, you're fighting a huge uphill battle. My 347" LS1 with ported 243's (common GM production head) put down 445 horsepower at the rear wheels, and traps 123 at a 3500lb raceweight. And it'll run cool, idle in traffic all day, at cruise down the road 1500rpm smooth as butter in 6th gear getting 20+mpg. There's no magic in the LS design, just outstanding engineering. Even the header bolts are easy to reach!! It's like a pure hot-rodder designed the LS and fixed everything we've always complained about. I've had several SBC's and been around hot-rodding for years, and they've been fun. But the LS, subjective opinions on looks aside, is as revolutionary as the original 265 SBC was in 1955. Rather we like it or not times are changing, and thankfully the old muscle cars and these trucks we all love have a timeless body style and design. But the engines which bred so much enthusiasm for previous generations just seem slow, heavy, and clunky compared to our modern powerplants. |
02-04-2014, 04:23 PM | #21 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Orlando fl
Posts: 106
|
Re: Sleeper Truck
I don't understand this quote, are you talking about all Dart heads.I'm looking at the aluminum 220 for my 406.are you saying the vortex or the camel humps will outperform all Dart heads? From what I hear they are very good. do you have any experience with them? just curious.
|
02-04-2014, 04:40 PM | #22 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: tucson,az
Posts: 274
|
Re: Sleeper Truck
dart ,afr,quick flow, all very good heads. all outflow any stock. its not even close.
I had darts in a 383 sbc and it was a huge jump over vortecs I had. they are just expensive. |
02-04-2014, 04:51 PM | #23 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Mickleton, NJ
Posts: 1,776
|
Re: Sleeper Truck
The way I understand it:
Camel humps< Vortec< pretty much everything aftermarket If you want an old school period correct kind of build, use Camel humps. Economical building ok power, use Vortec heads. Want real good power and have the cash, aftermarket aluminum heads are the way to go. Lots of opinions out there on one maker vs. the other, but any of them are better at making power than factory stuff. I went with a Vortec head crate motor because it fit the budget and makes decent enough power. Its a lot more power than I can put to the ground, that's for sure.
__________________
Shawn 1970 Chevy C-10 SWB, 350, TKO 600 5 speed My build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=559881 |
02-04-2014, 04:53 PM | #24 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: tucson,az
Posts: 274
|
Re: Sleeper Truck
great point Lattimer. if all you do is burn outs whats the point? anything above 300 hp is great in these trucks
|
02-04-2014, 04:57 PM | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Rapid City, SD
Posts: 2,281
|
Re: Sleeper Truck
Quote:
Look at the numbers. Trick Flow, AFR, Dart, Edelbrock, etc... compare apples to apples then look at the cost of each product. Also...Don't forget to look into some assemblies that some of these race motor builders supply, they can be quite a bargain in the long run. Saying you had this brand or that brand and hated them, is like saying you don't like Chevrolet because you had a '82 Chevette once.. Just compare Apples to Apples on the heads your looking at. I have sold all those brand heads before. The cam choice and rear end gears play a huge roll in how well a car (or truck) runs... Do some research... then go with your gut and buy what you want.
__________________
My Trucks: 1967 Chevrolet Short Wide Box 327 TH350 9" w/3.90 gears paint will be White - Current Project 1967 Chevrolet Custom LWB 283 TH400 3.73 Posi, no-AC, no-PS, no-PB, bench-seat, small-window - mostly orig driver 1967 Chevrolet CST LWB originally a 327 TH400 3.73 Posi AC PS PB, had Buddy Buckets, Small Window - parts truck 1967 Chevrolet CST LWB, 283 MT 3.73 had Buddy Buckets, Panoramic Window - parts truck 2001 Chevrolet 3500 2WD Crew Cab Dually 8.1L Allison White Last edited by 67 cst swb; 02-04-2014 at 05:03 PM. |
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|