The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Tools, Shops and Shop Safety

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-29-2014, 06:50 PM   #1
JayDubBlazer
go cyclones
 
JayDubBlazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 1,883
Lincoln 140T vs. 140C

After shopping around I've found three different options when looking for a new welder. I have taken the Miller off the list due to the higher cost. All three have 20% duty cycle at 90 amps, and similar warranties.

Hobart 140 - I know is a economical version of the miller. It has variable wire feed and five position tapped voltage control. It is the cheapest at $500.

Lincoln 140T - Same options as the Hobart 140. It has variable wire feed and five position tapped voltage control. Little bit more expensive, seen it listed for around $540. Paying for the Lincoln name?

Lincoln 140C - It has variable wire feed and variable voltage control. I swung by the local welding store and there is a $75 rebate on this model and is currently listed for $659 after rebate.

My question. The Lincoln 140C costs $159 more than the Hobart, and $119 more than the 140T. Is the variable voltage control paying the extra cost, or should I just go with the Hobart.

Thanks,

Wes
__________________
Wes



PROJECT OLE GREEN

1972 Blazer 4X4 350/700R4
2017 Silverado LT
JayDubBlazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2014, 07:38 PM   #2
tinydb84
Registered User
 
tinydb84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Jose Ca
Posts: 2,871
Re: Lincoln 140T vs. 140C

I have welded with Lincoln and Hobart. None of those models though. The difference between the two Lincolns is that one has a metal feed vs a plastic feed I believe.

I have a Hobart 190. I love it. Not as many settings as the 256(254?) that I learned on but I haven't had the need to be that precise.

I would strongly suggest getting a 220v welder though. I bought a smaller welder then ended up having to buy another larger one to do the work on my frame and suspension.
__________________
David
Used parts build: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=638991
My brother's Nova: http://www.67-72chevytrucks.com/vboa...d.php?t=727985
Rear suspension rework: http://www.67-72chevytrucks.com/vboa...d.php?t=750557
Instagram: myfabguy
tinydb84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2014, 10:59 PM   #3
_Ogre
Registered User
 
_Ogre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Motown
Posts: 7,680
Re: Lincoln 140T vs. 140C

they're all basically the same name brand welders, while i like lincoln, i'd go with the hobart based on price
any 120 volt welder will weld 1/4'' steel with a single pass, thicker with multiple passes
there is nothing on any vehicle that is over 10 gauge steel, all of these will weld twice that thickness
in a single pass
__________________
cool, an ogre smiley Ogre's 58 Truk build

how to put your truck year and build thread into your signature
shop air compressor timer
_Ogre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2014, 11:29 PM   #4
truckster
Senior Member
 
truckster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Orem, Utah
Posts: 7,976
Re: Lincoln 140T vs. 140C

I have the Hobart 140. I love it. It's a great little welder and I like the fact that I can take it anywhere and weld with it because it's 120 volts. It has steel feed rollers and I've never had a problem with it feeding (I use .024 most of the time) and I have never maxed it out, even welding 1/4 plate. I would definitely recommend it, although I haven't used the other machines.

As far as tapped vs variable, I don't think it's that big of a deal. Set your voltage for the material, then adjust wire feed to get a good weld.
truckster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2014, 03:42 PM   #5
JayDubBlazer
go cyclones
 
JayDubBlazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 1,883
Re: Lincoln 140T vs. 140C

Thanks guys. I was just wondering if anyone had any positives remarks to the variable voltage setting? There was another thread that had a guy that returned his 140T for a 140C. Like truckster said, you have enough ability to adjust with five settings, and then fine tune with the feed speed.
__________________
Wes



PROJECT OLE GREEN

1972 Blazer 4X4 350/700R4
2017 Silverado LT
JayDubBlazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2014, 07:06 PM   #6
tinydb84
Registered User
 
tinydb84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Jose Ca
Posts: 2,871
Re: Lincoln 140T vs. 140C

Quote:
Originally Posted by truckster View Post
I have the Hobart 140. I love it. It's a great little welder and I like the fact that I can take it anywhere and weld with it because it's 120 volts. It has steel feed rollers and I've never had a problem with it feeding (I use .024 most of the time) and I have never maxed it out, even welding 1/4 plate. I would definitely recommend it, although I haven't used the other machines.

As far as tapped vs variable, I don't think it's that big of a deal. Set your voltage for the material, then adjust wire feed to get a good weld.
I agree in theory you could weld 1/4'' with a 110 but many (most?) aren't skilled/knowledgeable enough to do it. That being said there is a giant thread on welding web where they weld a 3/8'' plate with a 110 (multi pass with preheat).

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayDubBlazer View Post
Thanks guys. I was just wondering if anyone had any positives remarks to the variable voltage setting? There was another thread that had a guy that returned his 140T for a 140C. Like truckster said, you have enough ability to adjust with five settings, and then fine tune with the feed speed.
I have welded with both variable and tap settings and honestly it wasn't much different. If you go with the Lincoln then make sure you get the metal drive rollers and not the plastic set up.
__________________
David
Used parts build: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=638991
My brother's Nova: http://www.67-72chevytrucks.com/vboa...d.php?t=727985
Rear suspension rework: http://www.67-72chevytrucks.com/vboa...d.php?t=750557
Instagram: myfabguy
tinydb84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2014, 09:26 PM   #7
BR3W CITY
meowMEOWmeowMEOW
 
BR3W CITY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: MKE WI
Posts: 7,128
Re: Lincoln 140T vs. 140C

I have the Hobart 211MVP and love it. Any voltage, runs well even through extension cords (big NO NO). Its a tad more (around $800) but its worth having something that can do thicker stuff and run a spool gun. TP Tools and Toolfetch had great prices with rebates and free shipping earlier in the season.
__________________
'66 Short Step / SD Tuned / Big Cam LQ4 / Backhalfed /Built 4l80e / #REBUILDEVERYTHING

MY BUILD THE H8RDCPTR //\\ MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL REV J HD
BR3W CITY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2014, 01:04 PM   #8
JayDubBlazer
go cyclones
 
JayDubBlazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 1,883
Re: Lincoln 140T vs. 140C

My dad called me last night and said that he had gotten a $50 off any purchase over $250 at norhtern tool. Going to try and run down to Des Moines today and pick me up a new welder.
__________________
Wes



PROJECT OLE GREEN

1972 Blazer 4X4 350/700R4
2017 Silverado LT
JayDubBlazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2015, 12:03 PM   #9
dragginmetal
here, just not logged in
 
dragginmetal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Tx
Posts: 1,011
Re: Lincoln 140T vs. 140C

I have the 140c. Bought it in 08. Paid 600 with a auto darking helmet. No real complaints. It takes a little practice to weld on a frame good. Wish I would have went with a 210 amp for that, but it has welded everything I have needed it to. From exhaust pipe, to the frame, to general farm use.
dragginmetal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2015, 07:58 PM   #10
83 Silverado
Registered User
 
83 Silverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Windsor, Ontario
Posts: 78
Re: Lincoln 140T vs. 140C

I'm running a miller 211 know a home but I had a Lincoln 140T for around 4 years and my biggest complaint about it was the drive roll setup with how the drive wheel attached with a plastic part to the drive motor, it made it difficult to swap drives for different size wire. The Miller/Hobart is a better drive setup if you plan on going from mig wire to flex core for different jobs.
83 Silverado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2015, 01:22 AM   #11
OhioChevy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Southern Ohio
Posts: 489
Re: Lincoln 140T vs. 140C

I have the Lincoln 140C welder and I like it real well. I use mostly 023 wire but have used 035 on thicker metal. If I need anything welded on a frame or heavier metal I just go to my son-in-law and he has a large Lincoln welder that does the job.
__________________
Ray
OhioChevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2015, 05:57 AM   #12
Spartan
Registered User
 
Spartan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Backwoods, OR
Posts: 888
Re: Lincoln 140T vs. 140C

Go with the best you can afford. To much adjustability is less of a problem than maybe needing it later. Jmho.
__________________
'69 K20 350/4 speed/Rockwell/D44/HO52.

"orange rhymes with door hinge"
Spartan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com