The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Engine & Drivetrain > LSx Swaps

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-11-2015, 04:38 PM   #26
comicaltatertot
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Ogden, Utah
Posts: 96
Re: 5.3 to 383 stroker

Quote:
Originally Posted by BR3W CITY View Post
Nope, but they are friends of ours. They are based out of Michigan but we do track days and some things with them occasionally.
Ah very nice. One last quick question would a 2800 stall still be good for towing?
__________________
1955 Chevrolet 3100 2nd series 235
1972 Chevrolet k/20 long bed 4x4 350
2005 GMC Sierra 5.3 L33
comicaltatertot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2015, 05:42 PM   #27
BR3W CITY
meowMEOWmeowMEOW
 
BR3W CITY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: MKE WI
Posts: 7,128
Re: 5.3 to 383 stroker

The looser the convertor, the more slip it will allow before stalling (i.e stall convertor). Unfortunately that means more heat.

If towing is a real concern, then it changes the way I look at the setup just a bit, because your at a slight disadvantage in displacement. I'd be staying with a lower stall (more like the 18-2300 range you were considering), and a cam that makes as much tq as fast as possible, more like what many of the 4x4 and RV owners choose. Too much cam and stall with a trailer means you'll end up spending a lot of time slipping and out of the power band (inefficient power), wasting a ton of energy (fuel, heat).

If you really want to tow bigger stuff like v8 boats, skidsteers etc, then starting with a 6L becomes WAY more practical. The same amount of work (cam upgrade, stall, headers) in a 6.0 lets you run way more cam and still make gobs of torque. I literally have pulled stumps out with my truck on drag radials (I really wish I filmed that).

I officially have overused the (parenthesis) in this post.
__________________
'66 Short Step / SD Tuned / Big Cam LQ4 / Backhalfed /Built 4l80e / #REBUILDEVERYTHING

MY BUILD THE H8RDCPTR //\\ MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL REV J HD
BR3W CITY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2015, 06:43 PM   #28
comicaltatertot
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Ogden, Utah
Posts: 96
Re: 5.3 to 383 stroker

Ok that sounds good, I figured as much (that is why I considered a 2K stall first) ok I will make sure the cam I choose makes torque fast (fast for a 5.3) Sometimes I wish I would have gone with a little bit heavier truck and just got the 6.0 would have been a little bit better than my 5.3. I just thought I would add in the parentheses of my own haha. Thanks again
__________________
1955 Chevrolet 3100 2nd series 235
1972 Chevrolet k/20 long bed 4x4 350
2005 GMC Sierra 5.3 L33
comicaltatertot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2015, 08:03 PM   #29
BR3W CITY
meowMEOWmeowMEOW
 
BR3W CITY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: MKE WI
Posts: 7,128
Re: 5.3 to 383 stroker

Its all a give and take. I wouldn't be afraid to tow something with my high stall, if it was only once a year for a few miles.

short duration cams will probably be your best bet. A higher lsa won't chug quite as much in traffic, 115/116 probably adequate. It'll also help minimize surging which becomes very sketchy with a loaded trailer or in traffic.
__________________
'66 Short Step / SD Tuned / Big Cam LQ4 / Backhalfed /Built 4l80e / #REBUILDEVERYTHING

MY BUILD THE H8RDCPTR //\\ MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL REV J HD
BR3W CITY is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com