12-04-2016, 05:17 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Chico
Posts: 39
|
Fuel Injection
I need some advise. I have a 72 C-10 with a stroked 350. The truck has been sitting for 10 years and I'm getting it going. The PO had a lot of parts that were never installed. One of which is a First fuel injection manifold unit. Looks like its the first generation unit. It most likely was purchased in 2006.
Here are my questions: 1) How hard is the install? I replaced carbs and manifolds but never a Fuel Injection Unit. 2) There is a v2 computer/ wiring set up. Should I upgrade? 3) What is the added value of the manifold system vs the carb type bolt on? If they were similar maybe I could sell the manifold assembly to by the carb type bolt on. I am trying to carefully allocate $ because I need a transmission badly. Thanks in advance! |
12-05-2016, 08:53 AM | #2 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: lowell ma
Posts: 750
|
Re: Fuel Injection
Quote:
Is it their TBI or is it the mpefi ? TBI bolts to a carb intake mpefi has 8 injectors and fuel rails ect.. mpefi is 1000x better, and why the oem's gave up on tbi 25 years ago. |
|
12-05-2016, 09:19 AM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Klein Texas
Posts: 3,852
|
Re: Fuel Injection
When I google "First Fuel Injection" I get picture of a TPI manifold like this:
I'd say swap it out! But I like fuel injection. I worked on too many carburetors in 1970's and 80's. I ran a GM TPI in my '72 pickup for several years. It ran great and got decent fuel economy with a 700R4 transmission.
__________________
My Classics: '72 K20 Suburban + '65 Dodge Town Wagon '72 Corvette Roadster +'67 Corvette Roadster '73 Z-28 Camaro '63 Ford SWB Uni Pickup '50 Ford Coupe |
12-05-2016, 09:27 AM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Ruskin Florida
Posts: 4,566
|
Re: Fuel Injection
Pics man! We need pics!
__________________
70 swb 4x4 406sbc 700r4 203/205 d60/14blt locker yadda yadda http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...88#post6935688 Yeller 72 Blazer 2wd conversion project "No Daggum Money" http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=550804 LS1-T56 3.73 LSD super budget build Blanco-2014 Sierra SWB https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=810350 |
12-05-2016, 09:47 AM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Chico
Posts: 39
|
|
12-05-2016, 09:49 AM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Chico
Posts: 39
|
Here is the truck and the fuel injection.
Posted via Mobile Device |
12-05-2016, 09:55 AM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Chico
Posts: 39
|
Re: Fuel Injection
I'm planning on putting in a 700R4 as well. Maybe I better get it running well with the carb after the tranny first then tackle the fuel injection. I'll give FIRST fuel injection a call to see if I should upgrade the computer system.
I'm itching to drive this truck! Posted via Mobile Device |
12-05-2016, 10:09 AM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Ruskin Florida
Posts: 4,566
|
Re: Fuel Injection
There is a thread on here about First Fuel Injection. Go to the search tab to find it. If I remember right it had good reviews. A sort of refined upgraded TPI unit.
Get an 87 or newer 700R4. Early ones are junky.
__________________
70 swb 4x4 406sbc 700r4 203/205 d60/14blt locker yadda yadda http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...88#post6935688 Yeller 72 Blazer 2wd conversion project "No Daggum Money" http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=550804 LS1-T56 3.73 LSD super budget build Blanco-2014 Sierra SWB https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=810350 |
12-05-2016, 10:21 AM | #9 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Chico
Posts: 39
|
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
|
12-05-2016, 11:12 AM | #10 | ||
"I ain't nobody, dork."
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Posts: 8,971
|
Re: Fuel Injection
I wouldn't bolt up a junk yard tranny from the 80's or early 90's without having it rebuilt. The days of yarding out a 700R4 or a 200-4R and just bolting them up are pretty much gone if you ask me. Those are 30 year old transmissions for the most part.
Gary
__________________
'cuz chicks dig scars... My 1972 GMC 1500 Super Custom (Creeping Death) "long term" build thread. The Rebuild of Creeping Death after the wreck Quote:
Quote:
|
||
12-05-2016, 11:16 AM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 61
|
Re: Fuel Injection
Get the transmission, then decide on the EFI. Seriously, what good is EFI if you truck doesn't move? While you're doing the transmission, you should look into your options for EFI. I like TPI, but it's such old tech and its biggest issue (and one for the EZ-EFI) is it doesn't like low-vacuum. If you have any cam (and by this I mean less then a 114 centerline), you'll have issues that require substantial tuning to fix. Add to that issue, that tuning something like that means burning a new chip. Can you burn chips?
For retro-fit, I really like the Holley Sniper EFI - it has tuning features, it's not nanny like the EZ-EFI (EZ allows you to suggest air fuel ratios but will override you if it thinks it knows better then you - which can be, how do we say, frustrating?) The rub on burning chips is this - I have a TBI system on a truck I built and rather then burn a chip, I'll replace it with the sniper system. In the end, it costs less - especially since I can sell my system to someone else to mitigate the cost. As I'm a newbie here, these are the systems I've run and am familiar with: 1) stock GM OBDII systems (think LS) 2) Megasquirt 1,3 and 3x 3) EZ-efi (rubbish) 4) TBI - OBDI 5) Holley pro-jection 6) Accel EFI 7) Holley Terminator There's even more, but that gives you an idea of stuff I've used... with all that said, I carefully consider what I'm building because in many, many cases a carb is better for the application then EFI. Last edited by SuperBuickGuy; 12-05-2016 at 11:22 AM. |
12-05-2016, 11:27 AM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 784
|
Re: Fuel Injection
First, your truck looks fantastic, lucky to have such a sweet looker.
From what you've said, you're interested in getting more performance, plus, I'd guess, a substantial increase in fuel economy (that's the main reason to get a 700R4). I love my 69, but despite the fact that it has a 350 QJet, and 3.73 axle, it does not perform nearly as well as my 98 350 Vortec and 4l60E, which is in many ways, what you are trying to achieve with the mods you have in mind. The FI on the Vortec makes such a difference in starting, idling, fuel economy--it's tough to go back to a carburetor. A good 700R4 will lower your cruising revs, and the stout first gear helps get off the line, but you already know all that. And, like the other guys have said, I'd work on that first. As for the FI, why not go for the latest tech? There are new units out there that are easy to install, and are supposed to tune themselves. From the little that I've read, Holley make good units, worth a look. Keep the thread alive as you progress.
__________________
Rick -69 GMC 910 Long Box, 350 -98 Chev Silverado 1500, 350 Vortec 4L60e -08 Mustang GT Convertible |
12-06-2016, 12:40 AM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Chico
Posts: 39
|
That is sound advise. I'll report back after the tranny is installed. I'm leaning towards selling the FIRST FI on Ebay.
Posted via Mobile Device |
12-06-2016, 08:52 AM | #14 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Athens, AL
Posts: 80
|
Re: Fuel Injection
Quote:
Travis |
|
12-06-2016, 04:01 PM | #15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Under the Truck Dreaming
Posts: 752
|
Re: Fuel Injection
__________________
72 K20 Custom Camper, D60, 14BFF, full roller 406 TPI w custom built ECU and yes..it has tow hooks...and a 5 speed |
12-07-2016, 01:37 AM | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 61
|
Re: Fuel Injection
To what I said before, I'll add this. To properly do EFI, you need to be able to properly set up a Holley carb. It's the basis of everything. Learn to read plugs, learn the major issues (like lean conditions) but also know when a motor isn't giving you all it should. Once you know how to do that with timing and a carb, then move to EFI. I made kind of a mistake when I started by jumping feet-first into a TBI swap in an S-10 Blazer (circa 1995). I could make a junker run, but I'd never made a car fast. I sold the car, in part, out of frustration for it not performing like it should... and I was right, and it still irritates me that I sold it before I figured it out (made worse by knowing what I know now).
I speak both EFI and carbs. I really like EFI, but don't mistake that there is a large amount of knowledge you should at least make an effort to learn. Otherwise, I'll by buying the car from you in 5 years and making it run. You'll hate me, and I'll tell you the urban legend about Henry Ford finding a person stuck beside the road with a broken car. Henry offered to help the guy for $1.00. The guy, frustrated said "okay." Henry got out a hammer and hit the motor on the side. It ran perfectly again. The person paid the $1.00 but complained about the steep price. Henry said "the tool rental was 25 cents, the knowledge of where to hit cost you 75 cents." (I abbreviate, but the point is valid).... and with all of that said, I'm always learning. Recently, I fixed the TBI on my FJ40 - someone had obviously had trouble with the TBI and removed it - I bought it at a swap meet for chump change. It came with 2 sets of spare everything. The problem? Holley (probably) didn't tighten the IAC valve so it had a vacuum leak - it lean backfired, ate an O2 sensor, and really made me think I was losing my mind.... I fixed it with an adjustable wrench. I paid less for the entire system then the new, spare parts cost... heck, I paid less then the O2 sensor plus the IAC valve for the entire, Howell system.... don't be that guy. And the absolute 1st thing to do (to revisit what I said before) is make it run perfectly before you make the change... otherwise you'll never know if you're chasing an EFI problem, or a faulty TB cable problem. |
12-07-2016, 08:06 AM | #17 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Athens, AL
Posts: 80
|
Re: Fuel Injection
SuperBuickGuy,
I think you've done this a while. LOL! Fantastic advice. Couldn't agree more. I find that 90% of the problems that My customers have with EFI, aren't EFI related at all. But the newest gizmo on the car always gets the blame! Travis |
12-07-2016, 04:53 PM | #18 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: lowell ma
Posts: 750
|
Re: Fuel Injection
The TPI.. will be good in the truck. it builds good low and mid range torque..
just understand they run out of breath at 5500rpm.. SLP and edel. make/made intake and runners with larger ports.. that upped the rpm range.. Those parts are still not cheap.. I looked into this.. as it be great on my 350 vortec crate . but the TPI vortec intake is 500+ and runners are 250-350+ then injectors etc.. |
12-08-2016, 02:55 AM | #19 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Midland, TX
Posts: 1,267
|
Re: Fuel Injection
Jlipman,
I've installed the F.I.R.S.T tip in my 72 The system works great and now has over 10k miles on it. It's sitting on top of a ZZ4 350 backed with a GM rebuilt 700R4 from a 91 Corvette, I really like it. You can see more in my build thread listed in my signature below. Milage around 16mpg at 75. I'll try and post some pics tomorrow.
__________________
1969 RS/SS Z10 Camaro Pace coupe 1972 GMC Short Step buildhttp://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=1#post6356218 1979 Mazda RX7 1979 Pontiac Trans Am WS6 & 1979 Pontiac Trans Am 10th Anniversary 1999 Honda Valkyrie 2006 Corvette Z06 2010 BMW 650i |
12-08-2016, 05:30 PM | #20 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 2,165
|
Re: Fuel Injection
I love my TPI. In my '83 K20 I swapped the original 350 for a '91 350 Corvette engine (aluminum heads). My mileage went from about 14 to over 17. The torque improvement is noticeable. As long as you use a fuel-injection friendly camshaft it should be great. I don't know anything about that system, but I see it uses a GM MAP sensor and so I assume throttle position, knock, and coolant temp as well? If so, then parts are available anywhere.
__________________
'83 K20-TPI '73 C10 '79 C10-ex-diesel(SOLD) '07 Tahoe(Son driving) '14 Suburban-DD '71 C10-current project |
12-08-2016, 07:16 PM | #21 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Midland, TX
Posts: 1,267
|
Re: Fuel Injection
Ok, let's see if I can post a few pics. Complete work up on my build thread.
Here's a link to the F.I.R.S.T web sight https://www.firstfuelinjection.com This system flows much better than a factory TPI which supports around 300hp. The FIRST should support 600hp. When you have a set of factory runners sitting next to the FIRST the difference is obvious. It's also or was less expensive than FAST/Holley TBI systems. I'm also using a FiTech TBI on another ZZ4 in my 69 Camaro, which is around $900 and is working great. I'm using this in my Camaro to retain the factory look. With the Air Cleaner installed it basically disappears. http://fitechefi.com
__________________
1969 RS/SS Z10 Camaro Pace coupe 1972 GMC Short Step buildhttp://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=1#post6356218 1979 Mazda RX7 1979 Pontiac Trans Am WS6 & 1979 Pontiac Trans Am 10th Anniversary 1999 Honda Valkyrie 2006 Corvette Z06 2010 BMW 650i Last edited by Z10; 12-08-2016 at 07:21 PM. |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|