The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-12-2016, 06:38 PM   #6
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,939
Re: Ride quality, coilovers vs bags vs lowering springs?

A big thing that isn't discussed in threads like this (concerning ride quality when comparing the choices) is that ride quality is very subjective.

Since it was mentioned above, short sidewall tires are a common hot-spot when discussing the impact they have on ride quality. That being said, I've ridden in a late model Vette, BMW M3, Trans Am, Mustang GT500, @ least 2 bagged/Porterbuilt Dropmember equipped C10's as well as my 1 ton bagged dually..... Other than my dually, they all had 35-40 series sidewalls yet all rode just fine. My dually rides pretty good considering it has uber-stiff load rated tires too.

It's not the short sidewall that kills the ride quality, it's the combination of parts, the vehicles clearance, & engineering.

Short (or stiff) sidewalls can kill the quality if things aren't thought out but many times it's other items (shocks/suspension bottoming or binding) that are the culprit.

If a sport tuned ride quality is acceptable, tires w/a sidewall height similar to mass produced OE specs (~4.00" tall) can ride good as long as everything else works properly. That being said, the taller the sidewall, the more impact it can absorb before transferring the forces through everything they're hold up.

In the pic of the short stepper posted, I would guess 20x8 w/a around a 255-40/20 (approx. 28" tall) on the front.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com