The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-01-2004, 10:05 PM   #1
68C15
blood type; Retumbo
 
68C15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: next to my reloading bench
Posts: 10,269
want leg room, need feedback

I have been thinking of stretching cab down the middle about 4 inches. question is what about side window glass? I would prefer to stay with safety glass for , well, safety. then thought of redisigning toeboards & bottom of firewall since they may need modification with the Caprice front chassis & frame "Z". anyone done either of these or am I just way to insane? I NEED LEG ROOM for road trips. I have seen pics of "extended cabs" & just dont think it looks right. JMO
thanks---Todd
__________________
Man rule #77...if you own a 67 stepside with a caddy 472 you will never be in danger of loosing you man card
68C15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2004, 10:44 PM   #2
Randy70C-10
Account Suspended
 
Randy70C-10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Virginia Beach, Va. U.S.A.
Posts: 15,320
Hmmmm, a "stretched" cab? I can't picture it, but I think it would look different for sure.
Randy70C-10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2004, 04:49 AM   #3
69 Short Fleet
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Kelowna B.C. Canada
Posts: 1,086
Sounds like it would be a lot of work (the box would have to be relocated and the rear bumper, but thats the least of your worries) I think I'd just relocate the gas tank (unless you did that already) and look for a different seat bench or buckets that would have a thinner back support to accomadate more legroom IMO. Later Doug
69 Short Fleet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2004, 07:09 AM   #4
68C15
blood type; Retumbo
 
68C15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: next to my reloading bench
Posts: 10,269
Randy, not long ago I had a thread in photoshop about this, looks cool, barely noticable.
Doug, I have a seat from a '89 F150 which has a thin back & feels wonderful. the seat is touching rear cab wall. I think about 3 more inches would be just right. I like to stretch out while driving.
ya know, just thinking. my arms are comfy with seat & wheel position. my legs feel cramped near pedals. maybe I should redo the toe-boards. go sit in a '73-'87 once & you will see what I mean. they have more room. Why?
__________________
Man rule #77...if you own a 67 stepside with a caddy 472 you will never be in danger of loosing you man card
68C15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2004, 08:36 AM   #5
'70_402
Senior Member
 
'70_402's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Pampa, Texas
Posts: 1,553
just how tall are you???
'70_402 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2004, 08:43 AM   #6
Putter
More Cowbell....
 
Putter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Puckett, MS
Posts: 3,569
Might be time to switch over to a 68 Suburban body....and just pull your truck around behind you. (just a thought)
__________________
There once was a member from Puckett.....Who ( fill in the blank blank blank ) bucket
Putter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2004, 10:14 AM   #7
LONGHAIR
just can't cover up my redneck
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 11,414
Here is a comparison shot of the pics that 68C15 was refering to.
The upper has the body stretched about 4-5 inches with the stock length bed still intact.
The lower pic is a bit less stretch to the cab (about 3) and the bed shortened, so the wheelbase stays the same. No frame stretch.
Attached Images
 
LONGHAIR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2004, 10:15 AM   #8
Slammed67
Progress = 0%
 
Slammed67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 2,108
This one has been stretched (among other things) but I'm not sure how much. Personally, I think it looks out of proportion. I think it'd be easier to buy a different truck

__________________
Jason - '67 GMC swb | '57 Bel-Air 4dr hardtop | '56 210 4dr Wagon | 2000 GMC Sierra
Slammed67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2004, 10:26 AM   #9
dubie
Registered User
 
dubie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Flin Flon, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 8,853
This one has a stretched cab on the B pillar side.
Attached Images
 
__________________
My name's Tim and I'm a truckaholic

My 56 Chevy shop truck build
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=562795
dubie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2004, 10:39 AM   #10
crazy longhorn
Fabricate till you "puke"
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ill
Posts: 9,402
I think stretching the B pillar would be a less frustrating mod than trying to stretch the cab & doors, & would still give the room needed. i have also seen a couple extended cabs made from a burb body..... crazyL
__________________
69 longhorn,4" chop,3/5 drop, 1/2 ton suspension/disc brakes,1 1/2" body drop,steel tilt clip, 5.3/Edelbrock rpm intake/600 carb, Hooker streetrod shorties,2 1/2" exhaust/ H pipe/50's Flows , 6 spd Richmond trans,12 bolt/ 3.40 gears....
crazy longhorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2004, 10:52 AM   #11
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,064
The silver truck was stretched 6" through the center of the cab. When you see it in person, it's hard to notice @ first glance.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2004, 12:32 PM   #12
Project1970
14.1 @ 96MPH
 
Project1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 2,811
Quote:
Originally Posted by 68C15
go sit in a '73-'87 once & you will see what I mean. they have more room. Why?
I noticed this last night helping my friend do a compression test on his '84 K5. There's a LOT of room in there!

I would probably go for modifying the floorboards. I think there's room to pull it off down there; I think the only problems you might run into (and none would be THAT hard to fix) would be shift linkage (go to a cable-type or a floor shifter), throttle (again, go to cable), and exhaust (just get creative )
__________________
Project1970 - LS1 Swap Complete!
Project1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2004, 09:25 PM   #13
68C15
blood type; Retumbo
 
68C15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: next to my reloading bench
Posts: 10,269
Jason, all I have to say to that pic is DAMN!!!!!!! someone read my mind. now I need to replace keboard from all the drool. shifter linkage is not a problem. I had the forethought to make a longer column when changing to tilt-telescope-automatic. (dont ask, a LOT of work) spare-replacement cab is cable type throttle (no brainer there) exhaust I am not sure of just yet, may have room.
decision made, I think
thanks guys, I love this place. digital multi-faceted brainstorm
Todd
__________________
Man rule #77...if you own a 67 stepside with a caddy 472 you will never be in danger of loosing you man card
68C15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com