The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > Heavy Haulers

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-30-2019, 06:31 PM   #5
Bob B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,457
Exclamation Re: Odd Flywheel Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Airdirect View Post
The VT-225 was a sorry engine, ours failed after 50K, Cummins warrantied it and it failed again at 100K. I think the turbo was just too much for the engine design. I choose the VT-225 because it was a Cummins, had replaceable liners, and was the largest horsepower offering. The engine did not have a lot of torque, you had to keep it wound up to maintain boost.
That was pretty much typical of all the Cummins V-8's, even the 903 needed to spin to make any power. The VT was a newer version of the old 'Triple Nickel' 555 with a turbo. The 555's were used around here transit buses, but not many trucks. They did have a nice sound to them though.

I liked our old TopKIcks with the 3208. We had little trouble with them and they turned sharp and rode well.
__________________
1967 GMC CM-2500 Camper Cruiser, 351E V-6, NP 435 4 speed, Dana 60, and factory A/C. 2012 GMC K-3500 WT regular cab, 6.0L Vortec, 6L90.
Bob B. is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com