Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-13-2019, 10:37 PM | #26 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Fort Wayne
Posts: 106
|
Re: Engine vs Trans vs gearing
Quote:
|
|
10-13-2019, 11:46 PM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Godley, TX
Posts: 17,976
|
Re: Engine vs Trans vs gearing
Recommend read up on the T5 swaps. Yes, an S10 tailshaft simplifies stick location in a bench cab, but S10 trans also requires input shaft spacing. The best of both worlds is a Camaro trans main body (no spacer required) with an S10 tailshaft. That, of course, requires two transmissions or a lucky craigslist franken-find. I prefer to use an S10 WC with a spacer. take a look here
Keep in mind that if you change rear gear only, your granny gear dilemma remains. A 3.07 rear makes granny slightly less granny, but not much - but also note, 2nd gear will have less acceleration than it already has - and if that's what you start off in, you'll notice the difference. Higher rear gear (lower numerical ratio) only improves your highway rpm problem. Also keep in mind that if you do a 3.07 rear only - and then decided to add an o/d trans later - rpm a lower highway speeds would be too low and you'd risk lugging the engine. So, if you want to go the 3.07 "only" route, make sure you're committed to stick with your trans (or a trans with a 1:1 final drive), as most overdrive transmissions + 3.07 result in TOO high of a highway ratio and low rpm. |
10-13-2019, 11:51 PM | #28 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Fort Wayne
Posts: 106
|
Re: Engine vs Trans vs gearing
Quote:
|
|
10-14-2019, 05:54 AM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Herculaneum MO (20 minutes south of St. Louis
Posts: 641
|
Re: Engine vs Trans vs gearing
I'm another fan of the T5 with 3.73 rear gears. This is what my wife's truck has & it is a very fun beast to drive. At the same time the OD gearing on the highway is perfect for cruising
__________________
67 C10 283 T5 swapped longbed fleetside = wife's daily driver 67 C20 292 (originally a 250)4speed longbed fleetside w/original wooden bed=my project truck 67 C10 283+.060 (so a 292 as well)T5 swapped longbed fleetside=my DD 72 C1500 Sierra Grande 350 TH350 longbed fleetside=wife's fair weather truck Can you tell we are fans of longbed fleetsides & 67s Chris |
10-14-2019, 01:23 PM | #30 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Doland SD
Posts: 836
|
Re: Engine vs Trans vs gearing
I have a 307 4 speed with 3.73 rear gears. It's about 3000 rpm at 65. Tires are 29 inch tall if I remember right. I go 55. It's about 2300rpm.
__________________
( second times the charm) 71 gmc c15 307 sbc 373 rear gears positrac sm 465 trans. ( not listed on spid but is original ) 94 chevy k1500 350 tbi 373 rear gears 4l60e one wheel peel. Gutless 07 gmc sierra classic rcsb 4.3 lt 5 speed w/t 04 chevy Silverado 1500 ext cab 5.3 4l60e. 81 chevy Scottsdale k10 muncie sm465 Np208 10 bolt 8.2 ( Old Green) |
10-14-2019, 03:32 PM | #31 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Lakewood
Posts: 83
|
Re: Engine vs Trans vs gearing
I bought my Camaro T5 from a seller on ebay who did the S10 swap as part of the deal. Granted the Camaro T5 WC's do not grow on trees like the Mustang versions but they are out there if you are persistent. Should have my swap wrapped up in a couple more weekends. I'm also doing a hydraulic clutch and sound insulation while I have the carpet out.
|
10-14-2019, 06:16 PM | #32 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Godley, TX
Posts: 17,976
|
Re: Engine vs Trans vs gearing
Quote:
|
|
10-14-2019, 07:14 PM | #33 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Jurupa Valley, Ca
Posts: 1,210
|
Re: Engine vs Trans vs gearing
Pretty much the rule with today's highway speeds is with at 1 to 1 final drive ratio on the trans, don't go lower than about 3.5:1 with the gears. An overdrive trans (usually .7 or so) go with 3.7 to 4.1 I have a OD auto trans with 4.10 and it is a nice combination.
__________________
Terry 1970 Custom Camper/C20 , GM Crate 350/7004R, Dana 60, factory AC |
10-14-2019, 09:50 PM | #34 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Lakewood
Posts: 83
|
Re: Engine vs Trans vs gearing
|
10-14-2019, 10:05 PM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Godley, TX
Posts: 17,976
|
Re: Engine vs Trans vs gearing
Nice setup! Sounds like fun.
|
10-15-2019, 03:57 PM | #36 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Tucson AZ by way of WI & CA
Posts: 509
|
Re: Engine vs Trans vs gearing
From your original post it sounds like you do occasionally hit the highway, but did not mention use of the truck, or a possible budget. Doing an automatic w/overdrive swap is not all that difficult. If you are not worried about removing the clutch pedal, having a neutral safety switch, back-up lights or a column shifter, it only gets easier. Its is easy enough to add a cooler, connect kickdown linkage, vacuum line and have the driveshaft modified. If you wanted to get a stock look, there are plenty of people parting these trucks to find all the parts needed for under $500. Recently swapped out the SM465 for a TH350, with 3:73 gearing. Probably could have completed it in a weekend, if I did not want to clean and paint everything. If automatic is not your cup of tea, then look at doing a NV3500 swap. Plenty of kits and posts about this change. Changing the rear gears only will get you some highway benefit, but will affect low speed drive-ability with the SM465, hence finding and overdrive. Another option, although more expensive, would be a gearvendors OD. Nice part of this option, is that if you ever wanted to sell the truck, just remove the unit and use on the next. These trucks are noisy and a 307 at 3000 rpm sounds like its gonna fall apart. Bottom line, you need to knock the RPM's down.
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|