The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > All 4x4 Tech & Off Roading

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-15-2022, 11:26 PM   #1
Short 3/4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Los Osos Ca
Posts: 559
T221 Rubber mount source

Anybody know of a source for the stock type rubber X-fer mounts? A few years ago a lot of the vendors had the bottoms available (but not the tops) now can't even find those. I have a set of the poly ones, but want to go back to rubber, unfortunately my old ones are not in great shape. Any leads will be most appreciated.
Thanks
Tom
__________________
65 short stepside K10
292-SM420-T221
8 lug closed D44 front
NoSpin HO72 4.10 rear
Short 3/4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2022, 10:06 PM   #2
Short 3/4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Los Osos Ca
Posts: 559
Re: T221 Rubber mount source

Still looking. Any idea?
Thanks
Tom
__________________
65 short stepside K10
292-SM420-T221
8 lug closed D44 front
NoSpin HO72 4.10 rear
Short 3/4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2023, 10:18 PM   #3
cbeerman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: NJ
Posts: 407
Re: T221 Rubber mount source

In searching for T221 info, someone had said that 1932-1948 Ford motor mounts would work. It looks like they were talking about the lower mount P/N b-6039-a
I can't confirm they will work but they look closer to our upper mount than bottom. I don't have any dimensions for any of the mounts.

BTW The GM P/Ns are
Upper Mount 2391771
Lower Mount 2391770

Good Luck
cbeerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2023, 12:03 AM   #4
Short 3/4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Los Osos Ca
Posts: 559
Re: T221 Rubber mount source

Quote:
Originally Posted by cbeerman View Post
In searching for T221 info, someone had said that 1932-1948 Ford motor mounts would work. It looks like they were talking about the lower mount P/N b-6039-a
I can't confirm they will work but they look closer to our upper mount than bottom. I don't have any dimensions for any of the mounts.

BTW The GM P/Ns are
Upper Mount 2391771
Lower Mount 2391770

Good Luck
Anyone tried these?
__________________
65 short stepside K10
292-SM420-T221
8 lug closed D44 front
NoSpin HO72 4.10 rear
Short 3/4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2023, 03:07 PM   #5
cbeerman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: NJ
Posts: 407
Re: T221 Rubber mount source

It is finally getting in the 60's here so I went out to pull my mount and guess what's missing form my truck

LOL

Unbelievably there was one listed on Ebay about a month ago The listing was over and it wasn't relisted so I messaged the seller. Luckily he responded and reposted the mount. It should be here next week.

The Ford motor mounts are smaller than the poly ones and have a bottom lip which would be no big deal to cut off.

I looked up a 1951 FORD F1 3.9L 239cid V8 and got the MARMON A2010 ones for $.73 each

I'll report back when I get my mount unless someone else has their GM cushions handy that they can measure.
Attached Images
     
cbeerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2023, 06:50 PM   #6
cbeerman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: NJ
Posts: 407
Re: T221 Rubber mount source

Well I got the mount today and those Ford motor mounts are too small
One thing I noticed is the old cushions are almost spongy not the hard rubber I was expecting.
After measuring the used cushions and I think something like this might work

https://www.ebay.com/itm/174909945276

The mounting bolts are 1/2"-13

Anyway here are the measurements of the upper cushion
Attached Images
     
cbeerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2023, 06:53 PM   #7
cbeerman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: NJ
Posts: 407
Re: T221 Rubber mount source

and the Lower cushion
Attached Images
     
cbeerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2023, 11:11 PM   #8
JPBrecheisen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Harrisville, New York
Posts: 459
Re: T221 Rubber mount source

Is there a particular reason you're opposed to the poly?

I have not searched for the rubber ones in some time but did buy the poly variety for the last 221 I had out.

If it's noise level reduction thing, I personally cannot tell a significant difference between which has rubber and which has poly purely from noise level.

I can however tell which ones have 85-140W and which have 80-90W for gear lube.

I do like the poly because it doesn't allow the case to walk around nearly as much and I have a hard time trusting quality of reproduction rubber products. Some of it doesn't seem to last very long.

If I come across some rubber ones, I'll chime in with source.

Jonathon
__________________
1960 GMC K1500 LB Fleet Side
1962 GMC K1000 LB Step Side
1988 Chevrolet C2500
JPBrecheisen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2023, 01:49 AM   #9
Short 3/4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Los Osos Ca
Posts: 559
Re: T221 Rubber mount source

I’ve been told the rubber ones are much quieter. Tried swapping in rubber, but made some other changes at the same time, so couldn’t tell if it helped.

Recently switched to MT90 gear oil, no real change in noise level, but figured it would help with heat. It does make it easier to shift though.

So are you saying the 85/140 quiets down the noise level? Never thought to try that. Thanks for the input

Tom
__________________
65 short stepside K10
292-SM420-T221
8 lug closed D44 front
NoSpin HO72 4.10 rear
Short 3/4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2023, 09:26 AM   #10
JPBrecheisen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Harrisville, New York
Posts: 459
Re: T221 Rubber mount source

Quote:
Originally Posted by Short 3/4 View Post
I’ve been told the rubber ones are much quieter. Tried swapping in rubber, but made some other changes at the same time, so couldn’t tell if it helped.

Recently switched to MT90 gear oil, no real change in noise level, but figured it would help with heat. It does make it easier to shift though.

So are you saying the 85/140 quiets down the noise level? Never thought to try that. Thanks for the input

Tom
I'm certain the rubber does make them a little quieter in theory. In my personal experience with my trucks, it's not a huge difference. Other s experience may vary. I had put 85-140 in one last summer and that made it run notably quieter.

I also spent a lot of time getting all the drive shafts vibration free through balancing rebuilding or replacement. Eliminating as much high frequency vibration helps to reduce the noise level also (if you have any). The shifters won't rattle/buzz at all when they are right. I mention this because most my trucks did that in the beginning.

I've heard that MT90 is best for the synchros in the old transmissions. I should do that too.

I will add that all the motor and trans mounts were replaced with OE rubber to include cab mounts. It all adds up to keep the noise out of the cab. They'll never be quiet but it helps.

Jonathon
__________________
1960 GMC K1500 LB Fleet Side
1962 GMC K1000 LB Step Side
1988 Chevrolet C2500

Last edited by JPBrecheisen; 04-02-2023 at 12:01 PM. Reason: Additional information
JPBrecheisen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com