Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-27-2023, 12:29 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: jefferson
Posts: 40
|
88-95 Bench Seat question
How much of a difference does the 88-95 OBS seat make in terms of leg room? Being 6'4" i'm looking for any gains that i can get but dont want to go through the trouble of sourcing one and doing the upholstery if its negligible.
|
12-27-2023, 05:59 PM | #2 |
State of Confusion!
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gulfport, MS USA
Posts: 47,216
|
Re: 88-95 Bench Seat question
To me it is more comfortable (6'1"), but not a dramatic difference in leg room.
__________________
Bill 1970 Chevy Custom/10 LWB Fleetside 2010 Toyota Tacoma PreRunner SR5 Double Cab - DD Member of Louisiana Classic Truck Club (LCTC) Bill's Gallery Life isn't tied with a bow, but it's still a gift. Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God! |
12-27-2023, 08:48 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Beebe, AR
Posts: 2,475
|
Re: 88-95 Bench Seat question
I am only 5’8” so leg and head room is not a huge concern for me but I do find the seat in my 67 overall more comfortable than stock and I like the head rests just in case I’m ever rear ended my head won’t hit the back glass.
__________________
1967 C10 1980 Jeep CJ5 2020 Toyota 4Runner 2024 Toyota Tundra |
12-28-2023, 02:56 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 2,165
|
Re: 88-95 Bench Seat question
I can't speak directly to a 67-72 but in a Square Body I can tell an appreciable difference. I am 6'1" and the OBS seat (on square body tracks) gave me roughly an inch in both directions. It's been almost 20 years since I did it, but I like it very much.
__________________
'83 K20-TPI '73 C10 '79 C10-ex-diesel(SOLD) '07 Tahoe(Son driving) '14 Suburban-DD '71 C10-current project |
12-28-2023, 07:11 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 1,457
|
Re: 88-95 Bench Seat question
I have one in my 72 GMC thread below. I wouldn't say it offers a bunch more room... maybe an inch. But the benefit is that it is one of the most comfortable OEM seats you can get, and it has a thin back on it as opposed to most aftermarket ones so you can put it all the way to the back window.
I am assuming you do not have tilt. If you are thinking of best value for your dollar I would invest in it. They are a little expensive but really cool in one of these old trucks. As a bonus, you can get them shortened. https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=828133 And as mentioned above: a less dishy steering wheel can offer more room.
__________________
DAVE Edmonton, Alberta 1959 Apache 1967 K20 1968 C20 1970 C10 1972 GMC 2500 1981 C10 |
12-28-2023, 08:34 PM | #6 |
State of Confusion!
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gulfport, MS USA
Posts: 47,216
|
Re: 88-95 Bench Seat question
Here is mine . I believe it is frim a 90 model. Had it recovered when it was putin truck avou 15 years ago.definitely better ghan stock to me..
__________________
Bill 1970 Chevy Custom/10 LWB Fleetside 2010 Toyota Tacoma PreRunner SR5 Double Cab - DD Member of Louisiana Classic Truck Club (LCTC) Bill's Gallery Life isn't tied with a bow, but it's still a gift. Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God! |
12-28-2023, 09:05 PM | #7 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: jefferson
Posts: 40
|
Re: 88-95 Bench Seat question
Quote:
dagnabbitt, the first thing i did when i aquired the truck was put a tilt in it. made a world of difference, its stock length thought.. |
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|