Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
View Poll Results: Which you prefere? | |||
Stocked | 27 | 27.27% | |
Lifted | 20 | 20.20% | |
Slammed | 43 | 43.43% | |
why did I even look at this post? | 9 | 9.09% | |
Voters: 99. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-27-2004, 03:58 PM | #1 | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Oroville, CA ( northern California)
Posts: 466
|
Lifted or Slammed or Stock?
well just got done looking in @ some pics in the pic section and I noticed something. They are all slammed. I understand why cars are slammed, But trucks are made for moving things and not going sideways wheel by wheel over a speed bump in a parking lot. And does anyone ever lift there trucks anymore? I am sure I am going to get major ripped on for this post but I am curious why people do it? I understand the motive behind restoring a car/truck to show quality but what good is it if you hit a bump on the ground and bottom out?
Which do you prefere?
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
10-27-2004, 04:11 PM | #2 | |
The Blazer King
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Valrico, Fl (Tampa)
Posts: 1,213
|
Quote:
__________________
72 2wd Blazer. Its the superbichinest, megacoolinest, superflowinest. |
|
10-27-2004, 04:15 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: DFW TX
Posts: 769
|
I bought my 67 already lowered but i would have done the same thing had it not already been done.
The simple answer to your questions is ..... it looks good. I'd like to tell you that it performs better or improves gas milage or something like that but the simple truth is that lowered trucks just look good. I use mine as a daily driver and dont "bottom out" on speed bumps or anything like that. It is still a truck and does a good job hauling things and even pulling a trailer. I have always been into speed and performance but needed the convienance of a truck and i get the best of both worlds with my truck lowered. Also, low profile performance tires would look pretty silly on a truck that wasnt dropped. |
10-27-2004, 04:17 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 2,155
|
You left out "lowered". A good 2.5/3 or 3/4 drop doesn't sacrifice load rating much, and the lower center of gravity makes the vehicle a lot more fun to drive- besides the fact that it looks cooler. Mine is dropped 2.5/3 and I don't tiptoe over speed bumps, and I still haul whatever I feel like hauling. Lowering a 4X4 would be pointless to me, but I don't see the problem with dropping a 2wd.
__________________
1942 Master Deluxe 1969 C/10 1985 Blazer CUCV 1987 Jimmy 2004 Tahoe 2005 Silverado 1500 2005 Silverado 3500 |
10-27-2004, 04:27 PM | #5 |
SKINNY TIRES RULE!
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Bothell, WA
Posts: 11,049
|
Just voting for lifted because I have two lifted K5s. I'd like to have a slammed Blazer too, but that is in the distant future.
__________________
bouncytruck 1972 K5 The Hauler 1994 K1500 Suburban The Daily2010 Kia Soul Wife's Ride2014 Fiat 500L |
10-27-2004, 04:40 PM | #6 |
Resident Curmudgeon
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: NH
Posts: 6,664
|
I think you should have included a "lowered" category as this is different than "slammed". Had you done so, this category as it pertains to 2wd trucks would be the most popular.
Here are my thoughts/opinion: 1. Lifted. Works for 4x4's only, and only if not overdone. No monster truck wannabees please! 2. Lowered. Best compromise between looks and hauling capacity if you don't want a stock stance and feel "slammed" is too radical. You can pull this of without changing to much else along the way. 3. Slammed. It's a fad. Given time we'll look back on this like we do big hair, leisure suits, Brady Bunch perms, and hair Bands and go WTF? 50 years from now, they'll be going "old School" and slamming their trucks. 4. Stock. Everybody loves a stock truck, even if it's for a blank canvas upon which to personalize We don't have such a large enthusiastic community because every hates how these trucks look Agan, only my opinions...as for me, I like them stock, but they're all good.
__________________
Currently on or near the homestead: 67 Chevy SWB 2WD stepside 350/3 on tree (Pat's) 67 GMC SWB 2WD Fleet 402/auto (Brian's under construction) 67 Chevy 3/4 ton 2WD 402/auto (Business Hauler) 67 Chevy 1 ton dually 2WD 396/4 speed (Former business hauler, Needs TLC) 68 Chevy 1/2 ton Suburban 2WD 250 six/3 on tree (Brian's Needs TLC) 70 Chevy 3/4 ton 4WD 350/4 speed (Pat's - Disguised as a 68 GMC) 71 Chevy SWB stepside (Crushed by tree - parts donor) 72 Chevy 3/4 ton 4WD (Parts donor) 72 Chevy 3/4 ton 4WD Suburban (Parts Donor) 72 GMC 3/4 ton 4WD 292 six/4 speed (Mine - Disguised as a 67 GMC) 81 GMC 4WD Dually Dump Body 350/4 speed (Business Hauler) 82 Camaro Z/28 355/Super T-10 (Pat's toy) 93 Caprice 9C1 (Brian's Cop Car) 02 Toyota Camry (Reliable but a souless steel and plastic hulk) 2011 2SS RS Camaro M6 Factory Hurst Shifter Maybe I need to sell some of this crap Yet another Bozo with a sawz-all |
10-27-2004, 05:16 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bremerton, WA
Posts: 1,839
|
As usual, CPNE is correct-o-mundo. I lowered mine 3" and 5" using springs and shocks that still give me a half ton rating. Combined with the rhino liner, I can still call mine a truck. Do I haul anything? Only if it's in cardboard boxes - are you crazy???
__________________
Silence is golden, duct tape is silver. - Scott |
10-27-2004, 05:20 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 8
|
Lowered
Not slammed but moderately lowered. 2.5/3 fits me perfectly.
The yellow blazer is a beautiful, lifted 4x4 specimen. Very properly done. 10 stars! |
10-27-2004, 05:48 PM | #9 | |
<<< R 67 PROJECT
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FortWorth Tx.
Posts: 767
|
Another Lowered
Quote:
okay so I dont play follow the leader very well the major drop on my truck was photoshopped,by "Longhair" and it looks bad a$$ but in reality it"s not feasable for my needs hence keeping w/Lowered.
__________________
NEW BABY!!! '67 STEPSIDE FRAME OFF PROJECT bullstowin40@sbcglobal.net -92 2wd burb 225k dailey driver -98 nissan quest the wifes -67 C-10 stepside my toy Last edited by R 78 PROJECT; 10-27-2004 at 05:56 PM. |
|
10-27-2004, 05:56 PM | #10 |
67 is sold
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Troy, Michigan
Posts: 6,738
|
Lowered
That is what custom is all about, custom to your taste |
10-27-2004, 05:58 PM | #11 |
State of Confusion!
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gulfport, MS USA
Posts: 47,090
|
I'm a stock person myself, mostly because I use mine (when they are together) as trucks and has a rod. But I also agree with CPNE's comments. Mostly, I like them all, but doesn't mean I want one that way.
__________________
Bill 1970 Chevy Custom/10 LWB Fleetside 2010 Toyota Tacoma PreRunner SR5 Double Cab - DD Member of Louisiana Classic Truck Club (LCTC) Bill's Gallery Life isn't tied with a bow, but it's still a gift. Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God! |
10-27-2004, 05:59 PM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Bismarck, ND
Posts: 4,293
|
I've never been a real fan of the slammed look. To each his/her own IMO.
What really looks dumb to me is when you see these budget lowered/slammed cars/trucks running around town. I'm talking about the ones you see bouncing over every ripple in the road and/or the geometry is way off on the wheels. You can tell it'd be a POS to drive. I've always been one to think if you are going to do something, spend the money and do it right.
__________________
Unrestored 68 C-10 CST. Original 327. 4-Speed CH465. 50k or so miles. TREASURER, Drum Brake Club. |
10-27-2004, 06:20 PM | #13 | |
Member since 2000
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Mountain View Ca / Mexico
Posts: 7,879
|
Quote:
Me ,I like them all..........stock, lifted, and dropped. I would love to have a stock truck. Someday. Last edited by Alexis; 10-27-2004 at 06:22 PM. |
|
10-27-2004, 06:40 PM | #15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,037
|
Well . . ... mine is more than just lowered so I guess I would fall into the very low/almost slammed category. However, my truck doesn't require creeping 1 tire @ a time to cross a speed bump. I do slow down for RR tracks but I do that in stock height vehicle as well. I also use my truck for work (towing my car trailer, hauling yard stuff, moving engines or bulky parts).
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
10-27-2004, 06:46 PM | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SW Washington
Posts: 947
|
i would take slammed over lifted anyday, not tryin to diss on anyone if they like something other than me, just my opinion
__________________
72 Chevy lwb, cowl hood, shaved antenna, shaved bedrails, blazer tank, sidemarker fill, 1pc windows, flowmaster 40's, alpine deck, infinity 6x9's, infinity 4"ers, 2 jl audio 10w0's, grant wheel, keyless entry and alarm, more waiting to be done... |
10-27-2004, 07:11 PM | #17 |
Happy to be here
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,023
|
Hell I like em all. Lifted trucks are cool and I don't even mind if it's done to a 2wd. A nice slightly lowered "sport truck" stance looks good all day long, and is easy to live with. Personally I want mine on the deck. I do not like it "laying rocker" because it ain't a hot rod if it don't have a rake.
Lowered trucks a trendy fad? I have been around lowered trucks for 30 years. I don't see it as being a trend....
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com Articles- "Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab "Elwood" the77_Remix 85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett" "Refining Sierra" |
10-27-2004, 07:21 PM | #18 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Vermont
Posts: 8,538
|
Lifted/Lowered/Stock
Really good question/thread.
I guess I like 'em all. I have one of each. My first was a lifted blazer, not extensive but still lifted w/bigger tires. My second is a stock height 4x4 swb truck and staying that way. My third is a 2wd/swb/fleet that has a 4/6 drop Also just picked up a 3/4 ton 4x4 burb and yes, it will stay stock as well. It's all personnel preference, they all have their pro's/cons and reasons for doing it. Do it your way, that's the point. |
10-27-2004, 07:48 PM | #19 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: North Louisiana
Posts: 4,501
|
I like 'em all, but slammed is not for me, though I can appreciate one done right. In fact, I have a stock height '70, a lifted '71 4x4, and want to build a lowered, (but not slammed) '68. Also, In my opinion, '67-'68 chevys make the best looking lowered trucks, and '71-'72 chevys make the best looking 4x4s.
__________________
Wynne 70 CST short fleet Hugger orange & white, 350/350, ps, pb, air, tilt, tach/vac/speedwarning, original buckets, AM/FM, oak bed floor, shoulder belts, 3.5"/5.5" drop, 20" American Racing VN425s. Build thread 53 Chevy shortbed 69 Camaro Click here to subscribe Chevy GMC International Truck Club Louisiana Charter Member http://www.louisianaclassictruckclub.com |
10-27-2004, 09:15 PM | #20 |
Back from the Dead
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Salem, Oregon
Posts: 522
|
I like em' anything but stock, as long as its either sky-high or scrapping off road-reflectors
I've considered both with my 72' but for now its sitting on bags...but I've come VERY close to swapping it to a 4x4... In a perfect world I think I'd just have one of everything! Kenny
__________________
The only Carb that matters to me is the one under my hood! Salem, Oregon |
10-27-2004, 10:07 PM | #21 |
Got Light Emitting Diode?
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Newberg, OR
Posts: 2,485
|
if its a 4wd then let it not be able to park in covered garages cause its too high and if its 2wd then let it scrap asphalt
__________________
1968 1/2 ton 2wd lwb 6 lug disc and bags up front. Next c notch and rear bags '02 Chevy Silverado LT ext cab short bed 2WD 5/7 drop on 22's(the family car) 1993 Cherokee work ride/weekend wheeler |
10-28-2004, 12:18 AM | #22 |
Speed Limit = Floorboard
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Kasilof, Alaska
Posts: 803
|
If its 4wd sure lift it just don't go radical with it. Personally I like the looks of a short wide bed thats 2/3 to 3/4 of stock height. I don't like dragging on the ground but a slight drop I think sets it off really nice. Happy medium is what looks the best.
__________________
1971 C20 350, 4-speed - Sold. 1985 K10 350, Built 700r4, Edel 1406, Performer intake, MSD Ign, Hooker Comps, Silverstars, Piaa drivers, LED tails, Toyo A/T 31's, Eaton Posi, the project. "Build for torque, horsepower will follow" |
10-28-2004, 12:27 AM | #23 |
Ebay Junky
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: CO
Posts: 893
|
slaaammmeddd
__________________
1972 CHEVY C-10 SWB 2WD - Possible Typhoon 4.3 turbo drivetrain.. 1983 Chevy c10 swb 2wd - possible 350tbi supercharged... |
10-28-2004, 12:50 AM | #24 |
huh ???
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Fredericksburg,Va.
Posts: 3,369
|
I personally hate lowered trucks. To me a truck is to be used not scraping the frame over bumps. But as they say to each his own. I know that my 72 and 86 are staying stock height...
Chuck
__________________
90 Blazer Silverado 350w/ 700R4 and 32" Kelly's "I am a bomb technician. If you see me running try to keep up!" |
10-28-2004, 06:29 AM | #25 |
Straight jacket required
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 882
|
I personally. like others, like 'em all!!!~~~~ IT'S MINE...AND I CAN WASH IT AS FAST AS I WANT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
1968 C10 Short Stepper 350/350 A/C P/S P/B Front disc 3/5 static/ 12bolt rear 3:73 1979 Pontiac Trans Am 10th Anniversary/455/4spd 2011 H-D Street Glide - CAMMED n lowered Dad always said,"Son, if you can't be good...be good at it." |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|