Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-29-2006, 07:33 PM | #26 |
Fabricate till you "puke"
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ill
Posts: 9,402
|
Re: K&N Air filter vs Paper: Test results
I have run K&N's for yrs, & while I have not seen the tests on them, I was told that the filter does a better job with a layer of dirt buildup.....but does not restrict the flow much at all (dirty). In light of what I am reading, I will probably add the foam prefilter to help the situation. I dont think the cost on the K&N is too big an issue tho.....he!! for 45 or 50 bones on a 14x4, the filter is pretty much lifetime(unless you take it off & run it over with the truck)(done that before!) If you figure 5-7 bucks a pop on the paper filters, after a while that adds up.... L
__________________
69 longhorn,4" chop,3/5 drop, 1/2 ton suspension/disc brakes,1 1/2" body drop,steel tilt clip, 5.3/Edelbrock rpm intake/600 carb, Hooker streetrod shorties,2 1/2" exhaust/ H pipe/50's Flows , 6 spd Richmond trans,12 bolt/ 3.40 gears.... |
11-29-2006, 08:26 PM | #27 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Dover Delaware
Posts: 270
|
Re: K&N Air filter vs Paper: Test results
I would like to know more about the oil used. My dad swears that there is a difference in oil used. Just a thought.
|
11-29-2006, 08:53 PM | #28 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 204
|
Re: K&N Air filter vs Paper: Test results
Well I am using royal purple in my 96 Cherokee that has a 4.0 and it is touching the 175,000 mark... With 5w30 royal purple, it cranks easier (especially now that we are getting to the single digits at night) the tick that was present with dino oil (probably a little piston slap b/c it went away when hot with dino oil) is non existent. It idles smoother too...
I will be switching my 454 to Royal Purple in another month or so when it needs changed. That thing only has 8,000 miles on it so i am unsure of what will change...
__________________
Project Family Values Build Thread Vehicles/Projects: -1971 C10 SWB Fleetside! Gathering parts now, will begin frame-off resto soon... Pleasure in the job puts perfection in the work. -Aristotle |
11-30-2006, 11:42 AM | #29 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Edmonton, AB, CAN.
Posts: 152
|
Re: K&N Air filter vs Paper: Test results
stick a quart of royal purple and a quart of regular oil in the freezer after an hour or two see which one pours easier... then you'll know one reason why RP is better.
__________________
May all your ups and downs be in the back of a Chevy!: |
11-30-2006, 12:55 PM | #30 | |
Licensed to Thrill!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northwest, GA
Posts: 1,673
|
Re: K&N Air filter vs Paper: Test results
Quote:
Read the entire site for interesting stuff! http://minimopar.knizefamily.net/oilfilters.html |
|
11-30-2006, 01:51 PM | #31 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 519
|
Re: K&N Air filter vs Paper: Test results
How's this Royal Purple stack up to Mobil 1? Would it help significantly more with bearing wear?
Thanks.
__________________
69 C-10 LWB, 350, 700r4, 3.73 posi-traction, front disc brakes. Built for the desert- She can take the heat! Vivat Rex Chevus! |
11-30-2006, 02:16 PM | #32 |
Licensed to Thrill!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northwest, GA
Posts: 1,673
|
Re: K&N Air filter vs Paper: Test results
BTW - Here's the main page to that link I posted earlier...
http://minimopar.knizefamily.net/oilfilterstudy.html Man, it's been a while since I was on that site. |
11-30-2006, 02:18 PM | #33 |
STL-KKN
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Tomball, Tx
Posts: 182
|
Re: K&N Air filter vs Paper: Test results
i know this was a thread about k&n but now that we are on the topic....AMSOIL! it was the first full syn oil on the market (back in 1930? something) living in fortcollins, co for the last 3 1/2" years i can atest to the fact that it pours smooooooth no matter the outside temp. not only that but it's a little more expensive that mobil 1, royal purple and the like but they offer 25,000 mile or once every year oil changes!!! they just redid their oil filters to 25,000 mile also (previously they where 12,500 mile) i have run it in every worthy (some leaked to much) engine and have absolutey no complaints. i have 36,000 miles on my 91 silverado with a new crate motor and 35,000 on the family van. i also ran 91,000 mile on the pontiac before i traded it in when the tranny died. other than break in on the 91 i have never lost a drop of oil and changed it according to the 12,500 or the new 25,000 mile schedule. i drive them all hard and again have never had a problem whatsoever.
|
11-30-2006, 02:47 PM | #34 |
Saving 1 truck at a time!
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kent, WA
Posts: 6,465
|
Re: K&N Air filter vs Paper: Test results
Zonaman, A good baseline should include a sample of the oil before you run it in the engine just to see what is already there.
__________________
'68 C20 Longhorn 50th Anniversary 400/TH400 '68 C20 Longhorn 50th Anniversary 468/TH400w/buckets '72 C20 Halfhorn (Longhorn w/o cab and front clip) '69 Flxible Cruiser (look up ugly in the dictionary) |
11-30-2006, 03:42 PM | #35 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 519
|
Re: K&N Air filter vs Paper: Test results
Can we not assume that a synthetic like Mobil 1 would have a consistant particle content out of the bottle?
__________________
69 C-10 LWB, 350, 700r4, 3.73 posi-traction, front disc brakes. Built for the desert- She can take the heat! Vivat Rex Chevus! |
11-30-2006, 04:52 PM | #36 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 136
|
Re: K&N Air filter vs Paper: Test results
You really should get a oil "catch can" for all turbo applications...then...no oil in intake or in turbo...
Last edited by Jayman931; 11-30-2006 at 04:55 PM. |
11-30-2006, 05:23 PM | #37 |
Too many projects
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fargo, ND land of the flat hills
Posts: 1,147
|
Re: K&N Air filter vs Paper: Test results
The K&N oil on my (now former) Tacoma fouled up the MAF sensor. Electrical contact cleaner has kept it clean ever since, but it put me back $200 for a new sensor. With carbs I don't think that would be a problem.
__________________
Andrew 84 GMC C1500 SWB 6.2 Diesel/700R4/3.42 "Grandpa's odd duck" Last edited by lowrollin70gmc; 11-30-2006 at 05:24 PM. |
11-30-2006, 10:11 PM | #38 |
"Trucks with Class"
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: OLYMPIA, WA, USA
Posts: 8,158
|
Re: K&N Air filter vs Paper: Test results
When did K&N air filter become so BAD? They have been hailed in every publication for decades! Supposedly tested and proven. Did something change?
|
02-02-2007, 04:19 PM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 458
|
Re: K&N Air filter vs Paper: Test results
the only reason royal purple make more power (according to testing ) is because it thins out emensily when heated. i have not tested it but this is what ive come across. supposed to be a bad product. I believe K&N air filters are good for dusty enviroments but they deposit oil onto sensors and causing computer grief so the car companies dont warranty problems associated with this
Last edited by cooters; 02-02-2007 at 04:22 PM. |
02-02-2007, 05:11 PM | #40 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Leander, Texas
Posts: 850
|
Re: K&N Air filter vs Paper: Test results
Has anyone ever personally done a dyno run with a K&N and with a paper filter on the same motor??
|
02-02-2007, 05:37 PM | #41 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Studio City, Calif.
Posts: 2,886
|
Re: K&N Air filter vs Paper: Test results
Quote:
__________________
'69 GMC C2500 Custom Camper, 8 1/2' bed, New GM 350, NP 435 Close Ratio 4spd. Trans., 3.73 Dana-60 open.Camper and Trailer wiring, PS, PB, AC, tach , three gas tanks, stereo speakers, 2nd owner, Work-Truck supreme. |
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|