|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-22-2008, 02:22 PM
|
#26 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: DFW (Forney)
Posts: 1,529
|
Re: X Pipe Installed Today
Since we know the details on having an X pipe now, How about some details on an H pipe setup?
__________________
'58 SWB Fleetside...Front & Rear Porterbuilt Dropmember, 6.0 LS /4L60E. Accuair E-level, 20 Billet Specialties (Vintecs) '63 Buick Riviera ... AccuAir E-level, 20" Billet Specialties (Vintecs) http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=528853&page=5 |
|
|
|
11-22-2008, 03:51 PM
|
#27 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sherwood Oregon
Posts: 1,908
|
Re: X Pipe Installed Today
I think the H does the same scavenging thing, just not as powerful because it isn't as smooth as an X
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2008, 08:29 PM
|
#28 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lantana, TX
Posts: 419
|
Re: X Pipe Installed Today
H-pipe helps a lot more in the lower rpm's but falls off quickly where the x-pipe begins to shine. I'll see if I can find the Hot Rod article that did a comparison of all the different types of merge pipes.
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2008, 08:34 PM
|
#29 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sherwood Oregon
Posts: 1,908
|
Re: X Pipe Installed Today
ya thats right, they are better for lower RPM. I read the same article
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
