The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-17-2009, 02:08 PM   #1
americanmusc1e
Senior Member
 
americanmusc1e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,079
Re: would our trucks be considered muscle trucks?

Ive always considered mine a musc1e truck even though it came with a 350/350 and 3.08rear I also consider a '69 camaro SS with a 350/350 and a 3.08 a musc1e car too
__________________
-- Josh

Instagram: @americanmusc1e

OLD SKOOL-- 1970 C10. 454/Th400/3.07 posi Build Thread
FARM TRUCK----1949 Chevrolet 3800 Power Wagon Hauler Build Thread

1999 4wd OBS Tahoe - daily.

DM me if you can't see photos i posted
americanmusc1e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 02:34 PM   #2
sameyrasmea72
Senior Member
 
sameyrasmea72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 2,443
Re: would our trucks be considered muscle trucks?

The 454ss may may have been built to be a muscle truck, but they sure didn't seem to have much "muscle". When I think of a muscle like factory truck put out by GM, I would think of a late 70's-79 454. Those trucks halled butt. I have heard from several people that they were the fastest production vehicle at the time.
__________________
72 Cheyenne Super
80 Silverado Blazer 2wd
sameyrasmea72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 03:36 PM   #3
MrC1
Dork For Days
 
MrC1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Dallas
Posts: 407
Re: would our trucks be considered muscle trucks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sameyrasmea72 View Post
The 454ss may may have been built to be a muscle truck, but they sure didn't seem to have much "muscle".
This is very true, but at the time, it was all Detriot was capable of.....mostly due to a lack of funding I'm sure.
__________________
1972 C20, 402/700R4 - My first classic truck, bought in September 2005. 85% transformed from "Farm" to "Cool" status!
1970 Dodge Challenger 440, 4sp (my other toy) 12.67 @ 117 MPH, with a pathetic 2.022 60'
2007 Dodge Charger SRT-8
2008 Cadillac CTS
All-American garage, baby!
MrC1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 06:25 PM   #4
Painter D
Registered User
 
Painter D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: DFW (Forney)
Posts: 1,529
Re: would our trucks be considered muscle trucks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sameyrasmea72 View Post
The 454ss may may have been built to be a muscle truck, but they sure didn't seem to have much "muscle". When I think of a muscle like factory truck put out by GM, I would think of a late 70's-79 454. Those trucks halled butt. I have heard from several people that they were the fastest production vehicle at the time.
Agreed

If the 454ss is considered a muscle truck ,I'd definately consider my truck as a muscle truck. I raced one of those the other day at a local dragstrip and ate it for lunch.
__________________
'58 SWB Fleetside...Front & Rear Porterbuilt Dropmember, 6.0 LS /4L60E. Accuair E-level, 20 Billet Specialties (Vintecs)

'63 Buick Riviera ... AccuAir E-level, 20" Billet Specialties (Vintecs)


http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=528853&page=5

Last edited by Painter D; 04-17-2009 at 06:26 PM.
Painter D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 06:31 PM   #5
69halfton
Registered User
 
69halfton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: King City, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 974
Re: would our trucks be considered muscle trucks?

yes.

a picture is worth 1000 words.

__________________
- Jason

If you can turn, Youre not going fast enough.

Favorite caption:

first car to 200 mph in the 1/4 mile, no parachute, drum brakes all the way around..
..back when men were men.
69halfton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 03:35 PM   #6
MrC1
Dork For Days
 
MrC1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Dallas
Posts: 407
Re: would our trucks be considered muscle trucks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by leos11104 View Post
wow honda guys i have a 92 civic hatch with a built b18c1 gt35 turbo cage hondata running 10.98 at bandimere in colorado (high altitude)

So sorry.

Must be fun to go so fast, but doing it in a Honduh would take most of the fun out of it for me.
__________________
1972 C20, 402/700R4 - My first classic truck, bought in September 2005. 85% transformed from "Farm" to "Cool" status!
1970 Dodge Challenger 440, 4sp (my other toy) 12.67 @ 117 MPH, with a pathetic 2.022 60'
2007 Dodge Charger SRT-8
2008 Cadillac CTS
All-American garage, baby!
MrC1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 03:50 PM   #7
americanmusc1e
Senior Member
 
americanmusc1e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,079
Re: would our trucks be considered muscle trucks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrC1 View Post
So sorry.

Must be fun to go so fast, but doing it in a Honduh would take most of the fun out of it for me.
X2 doing it in a 40 year old vehicle is much more fun.

Its funny how engines designed in the fifties(chevy small block) and sixties(chevy big block) can beat up on modern "high tech" engines, not just four cylinders either. ford 4.6's and 5.7/6.1 hemi's have to work hard to beat a good chevy smallblock(most of the time you can build a small block for less)
__________________
-- Josh

Instagram: @americanmusc1e

OLD SKOOL-- 1970 C10. 454/Th400/3.07 posi Build Thread
FARM TRUCK----1949 Chevrolet 3800 Power Wagon Hauler Build Thread

1999 4wd OBS Tahoe - daily.

DM me if you can't see photos i posted
americanmusc1e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 04:34 PM   #8
72 SUPER10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: LUCEDALE MS.
Posts: 157
Re: would our trucks be considered muscle trucks?

yeah they are muscle,
72 SUPER10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 04:44 PM   #9
combustion
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: chandler
Posts: 331
Re: would our trucks be considered muscle trucks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by leos11104 View Post
wow honda guys i have a 92 civic hatch with a built b18c1 gt35 turbo cage hondata running 10.98 at bandimere in colorado (high altitude)
thatsa pretty big turbo. what are your numbers? fastest honda i have had was a k20a eg hatch. k pro, bone stock R swap , all motor full interior 230lb driver. i could not break past the 13's without slicks. bs traction problems of fwd. the street tires dont help either. 12.7 is my best

back to topic. i always looked at them as one. but i guess not and you guys pointed out why. either way, they are ballin rodzz
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by special-K View Post
If it`s 3.73 ratio you will spint the wheel 100 times to the driveshaft`s 373 times.Or,if you`re lazy,you could just spin the wheel once and the driveshaft will spin 3.73 times.Or, 3 and 3/4 turns.And if you`re real lazy,I can sell you a tab for whatever ratio you want.
Or,you could read all the suggestions and try those.It`s been well explained,I think,already.
combustion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 06:21 PM   #10
72 SUPER10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: LUCEDALE MS.
Posts: 157
Re: would our trucks be considered muscle trucks?

I WOULD RUN THE HONDA ANYTIME WITH MY TRUCK. JUST STANDING UP UP FOR THE OLD RED WHITE AND BLUE
72 SUPER10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 03:35 PM   #11
John Fabris
TOTY 2006
 
John Fabris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Magalia CA USA
Posts: 2,270
Re: would our trucks be considered muscle trucks?

10 years earlier then the dodge is the 68 SS El Camino. Is this not considered the first muscle truck?
__________________
John Fabris
67 C10 SWB

Last edited by John Fabris; 04-17-2009 at 03:37 PM.
John Fabris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 03:41 PM   #12
americanmusc1e
Senior Member
 
americanmusc1e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,079
Re: would our trucks be considered muscle trucks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Fabris View Post
10 years earlier then the dodge is the 68 SS El Camino. Is this not considered the first muscle truck?
I'd say so,
how bout a 67 short fleet with a 327/4spd and 4.10's
I'd say so
__________________
-- Josh

Instagram: @americanmusc1e

OLD SKOOL-- 1970 C10. 454/Th400/3.07 posi Build Thread
FARM TRUCK----1949 Chevrolet 3800 Power Wagon Hauler Build Thread

1999 4wd OBS Tahoe - daily.

DM me if you can't see photos i posted
americanmusc1e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2009, 01:51 AM   #13
BT Classics
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 108
Re: would our trucks be considered muscle trucks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Fabris View Post
10 years earlier then the dodge is the 68 SS El Camino. Is this not considered the first muscle truck?
Dodge started offering a high performance package for the trucks in 1964. 426 Wedge, tach, heavy duty gauges, power steering, dual exhaust and traction bars. The trucks are very rare but I think this might be the first time a truck package was offered to compete with detroit muscle cars.
__________________
1955 Chevy "Bobby's Girl"
1956 Stepside Harley Hauler
1972 C-10 454BB
BT Classics is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2009, 06:10 AM   #14
1bad chevy
Registered User
 
1bad chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: POWNAL VERMONT
Posts: 343
Re: would our trucks be considered muscle trucks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Fabris View Post
10 years earlier then the dodge is the 68 SS El Camino. Is this not considered the first muscle truck?
ther ya go you said it all and beat me to it. now that is a true definition of what a MUSCLE TRUCK IS and also remember we the 67-72 guy's are by gm classified as THE SPORT TRUCK ERA so with that said yea we are cOnsidered in my mind MUSCLE TRUCK'S
__________________
1972 c-20 chevy 500 caddy/4.10posi / 1972 3/4 ton gmc 350 4x4/4.10posi front&rear
1bad chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2009, 03:31 PM   #15
BT Classics
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 108
Re: would our trucks be considered muscle trucks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1bad chevy View Post
67-72 guy's are by gm classified as THE SPORT TRUCK ERA
I thought Sport Trucks were those factory packages after the 1970's. Such as Chevy S10 SS, 454 SS, S10 Cameo; GMC Sierra GT, Syclone, Typhoon, Sonoma GT; Ford Lightning; Dodge Ram SS/T, Indy 500, SRT10, Shelby Dakota, Lil Red Dakota
BT Classics is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2009, 05:26 PM   #16
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,851
Re: would our trucks be considered muscle trucks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Fabris View Post
10 years earlier then the dodge is the 68 SS El Camino. Is this not considered the first muscle truck?
True,except they aren`t a true truck since they are built on a car platform and it just has all the car stuff on it.
And...

Quote:
Originally Posted by BT Classics View Post
Dodge started offering a high performance package for the trucks in 1964. 426 Wedge, tach, heavy duty gauges, power steering, dual exhaust and traction bars. The trucks are very rare but I think this might be the first time a truck package was offered to compete with detroit muscle cars.
Then,this guy down here...vvv...must have skipped over this up here...^^^...and quoted John`s statement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1bad chevy View Post
ther ya go you said it all and beat me to it. now that is a true definition of what a MUSCLE TRUCK IS and also remember we the 67-72 guy's are by gm classified as THE SPORT TRUCK ERA so with that said yea we are cOnsidered in my mind MUSCLE TRUCK'S
Then this guy said...vvv

Quote:
Originally Posted by BT Classics View Post
I thought Sport Trucks were those factory packages after the 1970's. Such as Chevy S10 SS, 454 SS, S10 Cameo; GMC Sierra GT, Syclone, Typhoon, Sonoma GT; Ford Lightning; Dodge Ram SS/T, Indy 500, SRT10, Shelby Dakota, Lil Red Dakota
So I say,"Sport Truck?Oh,like a`67 CST?As in Custom Sport Truck?"

Since last reading this a thought hit me.I doubt most on this sight,due to their age,can really appreciate the signifigance of bucket seats & console in these trucks.No one but me has mentioned them to support the "factory" Muscle Truck status of some of the 67-72s.This was the 1st they ever went in a truck.Originally,bucket seats were a sports car thing that found it`s was into American Muscle by the`60s when what we refer to as Muscle Cars began.Usually found with a 4-on-the-floor although Pony Cars came out with console shift automatics.Did mustangs come with column shifts at all?I`m not sure but I believe 3spd,4spd,and automatic came on the floor and only bucket seats.The`63 Riviera has all buckets and all console automatics.Our trucks have all that except 4spd.I saw where someone mentioned a 4spd trick as part of the muscle thing.Not quite so,they were work tansmissions with wide ratio and long throw.The manual option for performance would have only been a 3spd.That`s what the`68 396 I had ran,with heavy clutch option as well as heavy trans option.Those things ran out!!That tall 1st would have yopu out 1/2 a car length in 50'.Hit second and wind it out!!I`m gettin`excited just remembering how that was.That was a muscle truck,I don`t care what anyone says.And,that`s exactly what these borthers were thinking when they ordered them.
Nowadays most cars have buckets and hardly any bench seats.Back then hardly anything had buckets and mostly bench.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2009, 05:54 PM   #17
74chevy454
Registered User
 
74chevy454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: sac,ca
Posts: 14
Re: would our trucks be considered muscle trucks?

My truck was bought by my grandfather back in 9/73 thats what the date is on the door jam info it was the top shelf model came with everything there was out for that year that came in a truck 454 th400, 3.73 14bolt, no smog, the good 781 heads and all the nice trimming. It was the towing package with 15x10 rims. Cheyenne super custom deluxe I think thats what the badgeing said. I have owned it since 92 when he sold the cement business. I ran the stock motor till the main beaings went bad. Took that stock 454 and put it in the corner for rebuild and through in the 468 all edelbrock components motor I built. I think if it came with low suspension and bb from factory that it could be called muscle. But mine being the 74 it is not considered a classic but california says its smog exempt so I say its a classic to me but its each ones opinion on the subject.
74chevy454 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 11:32 PM   #18
72BLUZ
Registered User
 
72BLUZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: lafayette, ga.
Posts: 832
Re: would our trucks be considered muscle trucks?

it is considered to be in the muscle era. anything up to a 72. thats from some of the shows that want allow anything newer than a 72
__________________
Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream.
It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.... Ronald Reagan
72BLUZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2009, 12:06 AM   #19
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,851
Re: would our trucks be considered muscle trucks?

A Honda isn`t a muscle truck.Get`em outta this thread.

A car with a big motor HD trans,full instrumentation,posi,bucket seats is a muscle car.There were trucks built like that,too.

A 78/79 360 had the hp of a 318 ten years earlier and drank twice as much fuel.I remember reading an article on how is that better for the environment.Pollution controls don`t compensate for burning twice the fuel for lower emmisions.Then,there was the 383 that could blow the doors off a 360.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2009, 01:00 AM   #20
Bishops Trucks
KEEP ON TRUCKIN'
 
Bishops Trucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sterling, Va.
Posts: 5,730
Re: would our trucks be considered muscle trucks?

I'm building my version of what GM would have produced with Yenko if they had built a truck together. A '71 Yenko 427 ST with an M22, a 12 bolt posi & many more speed goodies. My plan is to have it appear to be factory built. I do have to agree though, the true muscle car is a factory built performance vehicle.
__________________
JIM
'97 GMC Sierra K1500
'95 Chevy Silverado C1500

'71 Cheyenne Z71 / LT1 & 4-Speed SWB K/10 Father/Son Project
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4l689JKXPnA
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/payments.php
"LIVIN' FREE FOREVER"
Bishops Trucks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2009, 09:55 AM   #21
weasel29gm
SLOW BUT SURE,BUT CLOSER
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: eleanor wv usa
Posts: 3,103
Re: would our trucks be considered muscle trucks?

Regardless of what term is used the last good truck made was '72!!!!!
__________________
69 C-10, OWNED 38YRS... 350 over 30, 350 Turbo, 3:73 Posi P/S, P/B Black with red and black int. ''LOVE THESE OLD ''TRUCKS.......
weasel29gm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2009, 10:12 AM   #22
leddzepp
Moderator
 
leddzepp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southern Cal
Posts: 20,115
Re: would our trucks be considered muscle trucks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by weasel29gm View Post
Regardless of what term is used the last good truck made was '72!!!!!
amen to that!
__________________
1972 C/10 Cheyenne Super SWB. Restored, loaded, slammed.

1968 C/10 50th Anniversary LWB. Unrestored, stock, daily driver/work truck.


RIP ElJay
RIP 67ChevyRedneck
RIP Grumpy Old Man
RIP FleetsidePaul
leddzepp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2009, 10:48 AM   #23
VanceH
Loving the Jimmster
 
VanceH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Emmett, idaho
Posts: 575
Re: would our trucks be considered muscle trucks?

I consider mine a muscle truck, its going to take alot of muscle to get this thing cleaned up and a running!!
VanceH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2009, 11:18 AM   #24
mr48chev
Registered User
 
mr48chev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toppenish, WA
Posts: 15,817
Re: would our trucks be considered muscle trucks?

Looks like you got the June 09 Hot Rod in the mail before everyone else did lol.

I don't think our trucks qualify in the true sense of the term. Production rig with a big engine, light body and intended to go fast.
The few special order big block trucks might be the exception but as there were no special "hot truck" packages from the factory.
Think what would have happened in late 66 if Chevy had offered a shortie 67 that was deluxed out with the buddy seats, strong 396, car style 4 speed and a few other tricks in the package.
Bucket seats weren't a requirement for a muscle car in the mid and late 60's. A guy couldn't have his favorite gal next to him if she was sitting way over there in the other bucket seat. I special ordered my 69 Cutlass S with a 310 hp 350, Muncie close box, 3.42 Posi and bench seat the only other option on the list being the am-fm multiplex radio. Probably the shortest option list on any Olds Williams & Swanson in Renton, Wa ever sold. I didn't want buckets because I wanted my very hot girlfriend at the time very close when I came back from Viet Nam (car was special ordered from there) and besides that they cost a couple hundred more.
mr48chev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2009, 09:57 PM   #25
weircc
Registered User
 
weircc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: richmond, MO
Posts: 794
Re: would our trucks be considered muscle trucks?

ill bet my "muscle truck" will hang with most muscle cars. when finished of course lol
weircc is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com