The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-15-2009, 11:34 PM   #1
northern 85
Registered User
 
northern 85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fairfield Maine
Posts: 1,759
Re: Need opinions on stance

I like it, put some wieght in the back, drive it for a while and let it settle out you might like it.
northern 85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2009, 11:52 PM   #2
Ronm909
67GMC Slammed
 
Ronm909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rancho Cucamonga, Ca
Posts: 255
Re: Need opinions on stance

I vote for 2" Blocks. that is a too much of a rake.
Ronm909 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 12:50 AM   #3
1968CHEVYC10
Registered User
 
1968CHEVYC10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Tomball, TX
Posts: 578
Re: Need opinions on stance

now just put some black rims on it and I would love it even more!
__________________
'68 C10 LWB 6.2NA/NP833 3.73's
1968CHEVYC10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 01:13 AM   #4
UltraBlue71
Registered User
 
UltraBlue71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: OKC OK
Posts: 489
Re: Need opinions on stance

I'd go 1.5-2 inches lower in the back, Jack.....
__________________
"You can put lipstick on a pig, sure it's pretty pig, but it's still just a PIG...

71 LWB
UltraBlue71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 01:32 AM   #5
KMACD71
Registered User
 
KMACD71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lethbridge,Alberta
Posts: 532
Re: Need opinions on stance

Here is a comparison for you. I like the rake better.
Attached Images
  
KMACD71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 06:36 AM   #6
big_al_71
Registered User
 
big_al_71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,375
Re: Need opinions on stance

Quote:
Originally Posted by KMACD71 View Post
Here is a comparison for you. I like the rake better.
I like it with the lower stance better......
__________________
Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please!!!!!.



Sylvester's build thread >>>http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...ht=big+rebuild
big_al_71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 01:30 PM   #7
Bpokey
Registered User
 
Bpokey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Belle Chasse LA
Posts: 147
Re: Need opinions on stance

Quote:
Originally Posted by KMACD71 View Post
Here is a comparison for you. I like the rake better.
Thanks for the comparison, I guess I might try for somewhere between the two. These springs have been on for only about a month will it take them awhile to settle? Longer than the front ones? Thanks everyone for the feedback. The last thing I want is "redneck rake"!
Bpokey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 09:07 AM   #8
KrazyKevin
What have I gotten into
 
KrazyKevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Liberty, TX
Posts: 123
Re: Need opinions on stance

It is amazing how much different drop stances look on different trucks. I guess rim and tire size really make a diff. I thought for sure in my mind that a 3/5 is what I wanted. Wellllll, maybe not. I could have sworn I've seen many a truck with a 3/5 that looked level as can be. Go figure.

If it were mine, I'd have to lower it a bit in the rear. But, still its a nice looking truck.
__________________
1972 Chevy SWB Fleetside
Project BumbleBee
KrazyKevin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 10:20 AM   #9
Tom Vogel
2WD Jimmy
 
Tom Vogel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Davis County, Utah
Posts: 2,564
Re: Need opinions on stance

These trucks were designed from the factory with a 'rake". It will handle better that way... honest. You might wish to talk to an alignment expert thats been around for awhile... they will back me up on this.
Tom Vogel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 10:49 AM   #10
BluTrukker
BOHICA
 
BluTrukker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Stewartville, MN
Posts: 440
Re: Need opinions on stance

"redneck rake" now thats funny I like a little rake, so I would only drop it one inch.
__________________
Trying to save someone from their own stupidity is like teaching a pig to dance. It is a waste of your time, and it annoys the pig!
BluTrukker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 11:21 AM   #11
dan42
Registered User
 
dan42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cali Central Coast
Posts: 5,191
Re: Need opinions on stance

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Vogel View Post
These trucks were designed from the factory with a 'rake". It will handle better that way... honest. You might wish to talk to an alignment expert thats been around for awhile... they will back me up on this.
I know they were designed to have a rake from the factory, but isn't that to compensate for potential load in the back? I can't imagine the rake would help the handling, all you're doing is frontloading a front-heavy vehicle a little more - but maybe they are designed to drive with a rake. I just don't know what the advantage would be if you're not driving around with a lot of weight in the back.
__________________
'67 SWB Fleetside ZZ4/350/Tremec 5-speed/4link/Scott's IFS - and fun as heck! SOLD
Click here to support the board
Philippians 4: 6-7
dan42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 01:00 PM   #12
tomtuna1978
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bend,Oregon
Posts: 225
Re: Need opinions on stance

put some weight in the back ! the truck will ride better and be a little lower ! but i do like the rake
tomtuna1978 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 02:41 PM   #13
leddzepp
Moderator
 
leddzepp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southern Cal
Posts: 20,004
Re: Need opinions on stance

A redneck rake....or a ba-donk-a-donk
__________________
1972 C/10 Cheyenne Super SWB. Restored, loaded, slammed.

1968 C/10 50th Anniversary LWB. Unrestored, stock, daily driver/work truck.


RIP ElJay
RIP 67ChevyRedneck
RIP Grumpy Old Man
leddzepp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 10:14 PM   #14
timski69gmc
Registered User
 
timski69gmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Cranbrook, BC
Posts: 253
Re: Need opinions on stance

Hey Pokey,
Love the second pic. I was going to suggest a little larger tire in the back, and the 2" block drop, but I didn't know the tire size. A little rake is always good. Not sure what my drop is, I did it really old school years ago. Probably around 4/6, running 235/60 front and 275/60 back, and get lots of positive comments on how it sits. But mine is a long box so it sits a little different. I really need to get a picture up. Didn't take any this summer, and the truck is now up on the stands and covered.
timski69gmc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2009, 12:49 AM   #15
Bpokey
Registered User
 
Bpokey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Belle Chasse LA
Posts: 147
Re: Need opinions on stance

Quote:
Originally Posted by timski69gmc View Post
Hey Pokey,
Love the second pic. I was going to suggest a little larger tire in the back, and the 2" block drop, but I didn't know the tire size. A little rake is always good. Not sure what my drop is, I did it really old school years ago. Probably around 4/6, running 235/60 front and 275/60 back, and get lots of positive comments on how it sits. But mine is a long box so it sits a little different. I really need to get a picture up. Didn't take any this summer, and the truck is now up on the stands and covered.
I guess it is time to put the toys away that far north. I have been to Vancouver a few times when I was stationed in Washington state. Beautiful country! It was also the only place I have been where I had to wear a coat while watching 4th of July fireworks.
Bpokey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 11:37 PM   #16
Becker67
Registered User
 
Becker67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Pueblo West, Colorado
Posts: 265
Re: Need opinions on stance

Heres mine with a 5/6 drop. It has 275/60/15 in the rear and 255/60/15 in th front. It sits about an inch higher in the back then the front.
__________________
Kevin
67 custom cab big window swb 350/700r4 4/6 drop tilt,a/c
69 custom/10 swb 350/350 4/6 drop tach,tilt
71 cheyenne super swb 454/700r4 4/6drop tach,tilt,a/c,bucket seats,speed warning
96 gmc swb
Becker67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2009, 01:06 AM   #17
timski69gmc
Registered User
 
timski69gmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Cranbrook, BC
Posts: 253
Re: Need opinions on stance

Yeah, sad but true, but you don't have to rub it in. Vancouver gets milder weather than we do in the interior of BC. We are just north of the Idaho border in the Rocky Mountains. A couple of small snow dumps, but nothing has stuck, but the beast gets parked usually the end of November until March. Hmm, that is really depressing. Guess that gives me time to pick away at it.
Looking at Hart_Rods Chevy, the Drag Lites do look really good. I was considering swapping out my rallies for some Pro Stars. They really suit these styles too.
timski69gmc is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com