The stance is looking a little better - Page 2 - The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

Alex1 · 04-14-2010, 08:30 AM

I wouldn't put 325's in the front - certainly not drag radials...

78BO · 04-20-2010, 09:42 AM

Nice! I'm old school fat tire guy myself. If you don't mind, can you get a shot from behind? I want to see how it looks. Are the wheels stock rallies?

68Timber · 04-20-2010, 11:44 AM

The wheels are 73-87 reproductions by Wheel Vintiques, 15x10's. I'll be happy to get a shot of the tread. I haven't measured the width but they're definitely fat and get a lot of looks.

Bennett68C10 · 04-20-2010, 12:45 PM

Quote:

1974ChevyC10

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bennett--G4L
Hey Bruiser do you by any chance have any pics of the tread on those drag radials. Just want to see how much tread they actually have. Thanks.

Bruiser blazer looks good i too like fat,wide tires on the rear.im used to being in the minority on the way i like trucks and cars as i dont care for the whole 20 inch or larger wheel craze.im not knocking anyone who likes that sort of thing its just not for me thats all so its nice to see a more old school type truck.

Bennett in the link to the summit page bruiser bought these tires from there is a blown up pic on there of the tire which shows the tread pattern up close.figuered i would pass that information along.

Yeah i saw that picture but Jegs has a different pic of the tread it is basically the same tread but in the middle it shows a completely bald spot i'm guessing cause the tire is much wider.

1974ChevyC10 · 04-20-2010, 02:21 PM

[QUOTE=Bennett--G4L;3930550]Yeah i saw that picture but Jegs has a different pic of the tread it is basically the same tread but in the middle it shows a completely bald spot i'm guessing cause the tire is much wider.[/QUOTE

i just saw that picture in my jegs printed catalog about the drag radial tires.
not sure if the pic on summit's website is of a different tire or the picture in jeg's catalog is of a different tire.nonetheless i still like that blazer the way it sits and the fat meats on the rear.almost tempted to put one of my trucks and my car up for sale to get a 2WD blazer

flamingbig10 · 04-20-2010, 10:17 AM

there 15x10

355bullet · 04-20-2010, 10:29 AM

BRUISER, nice blazer!
where did u order the rallys from? im looking for a pair for my 1978
2wd.
what is the back spacing on those?
thanks.

04-14-2010, 08:30 AM	#1
Alex1 Registered User Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Ottawa Ontario Canada Posts: 1,156	Re: The stance is looking a little better I wouldn't put 325's in the front - certainly not drag radials...

04-20-2010, 09:42 AM	#2
78BO Registered User Join Date: May 2008 Location: Austin TX Posts: 531	Re: The stance is looking a little better Nice! I'm old school fat tire guy myself. If you don't mind, can you get a shot from behind? I want to see how it looks. Are the wheels stock rallies? __________________ 1978 Chevy C10 Bonanza, 405hp/440tq 383, tweeked Th350. http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.ph...&id=1116781152

04-20-2010, 11:44 AM	#3
68Timber I know the pieces fit Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: MONTGOMERY, AL Posts: 5,523	Re: The stance is looking a little better The wheels are 73-87 reproductions by Wheel Vintiques, 15x10's. I'll be happy to get a shot of the tread. I haven't measured the width but they're definitely fat and get a lot of looks. __________________ John 79 2wd Blazer (Bruiser) 85 M1009 Blazer (Sarge) build 74 Honda Z50 build

04-20-2010, 02:21 PM	#5
1974ChevyC10 Overworked and Underlaid Join Date: May 2002 Location: Flagstaff,Arizona Posts: 1,279	Re: The stance is looking a little better [QUOTE=Bennett--G4L;3930550]Yeah i saw that picture but Jegs has a different pic of the tread it is basically the same tread but in the middle it shows a completely bald spot i'm guessing cause the tire is much wider.[/QUOTE i just saw that picture in my jegs printed catalog about the drag radial tires. not sure if the pic on summit's website is of a different tire or the picture in jeg's catalog is of a different tire.nonetheless i still like that blazer the way it sits and the fat meats on the rear.almost tempted to put one of my trucks and my car up for sale to get a 2WD blazer __________________ I'd rather push a Chevy than drive a Ford The Beast-1978 C10 LWB Red-1978 C10 LWB (Uncle Mike)Michael Henry Millett 11/5/1957 to 03/08/2012 Gone but will never be forgotten-RIP (Uncle Chuck)Charles Manning Gulbronsen Sr 1956-2012 Taken from us to soon but you will live on in our hearts-RIP

04-20-2010, 10:17 AM	#6
flamingbig10 6.0 powered square Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Mesquite texas Posts: 3,459	Re: The stance is looking a little better there 15x10 __________________ Aaron 1980 c-10 short bed lowered, cammed 6.0, 4l80e 3600 stall, smp tune, wilwoods, and flames best time so far best et 7.86 @87 on motor 7.57 90 on a 75 shot Build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=283326

04-20-2010, 10:29 AM	#7
355bullet Registered User Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: el paso, tx Posts: 510	Re: The stance is looking a little better BRUISER, nice blazer! where did u order the rallys from? im looking for a pair for my 1978 2wd. what is the back spacing on those? thanks. __________________ www.southwestdrags.com www.elpasocalendargirls.com www.msdignition.com www.atomicefi.com https://www.facebook.com/MSDperformance

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode



Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.