The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-19-2010, 04:42 PM   #26
scrapmetalart
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: DAYTON
Posts: 505
Re: Driveshaft concerns/questions

Quote:
Originally Posted by brad_man_72 View Post
I work in a driveline shop so I build new. You can modify a used shaft. Definitely work for a professional and ballance.

unless you are using a transmission with a bolt on yoke (you can use a slip trans yoke on these transmissions) or use bolt on yoke and have a slip and stub installed at trans end of shaft. The trans yoke provides more than enough slip for suspension travel, and you can't have more than 1 slip in a one piece driveline. It will fall out.
I thought the rear shaft was the problem when lowering & that the slip joint needed added to it....

Maybe the rear shaft just needs shortened after substantial lowering?
__________________
frontstreetcycle on Instagram

Last edited by scrapmetalart; 10-19-2010 at 04:42 PM.
scrapmetalart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2010, 01:26 PM   #27
brad_man_72
the boat guy
 
brad_man_72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: springfield mo
Posts: 2,339
Re: Driveshaft concerns/questions

my last post was only referring to 1 piece driveshafts.

The stock style carrier bearings do allow for some movement fore and aft. If you use a more solid carrier you would have to put a slip in the rear shaft. Carrier bearing refers to 2 piece driveshafts only. Trailing arm trucks usually don't require much slip at all. Which is the only reason can assume gm didn't see the need for a slip in the rear shaft of a 2 piece driveline.
__________________
67, swb, fleet, tach, throttle, 5.3, 4l60e, 3.73's, fuel cell, 5 lug, p.d.b., 4-6 drop. great little truck
66, stevens drag/ski 18' silouette, 350, 2.02 doublehump heads. comp extreme marine 278 cam, vette 7 fin valve covers, old polished edelbrock intake, velvetdrive, casale v-drive, adj cavitation plate.
28, model a rpu project,
brad_man_72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2010, 05:44 PM   #28
Sport/Truck
Sierra Grande Club
 
Sport/Truck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Mexico USA
Posts: 2,433
Re: Driveshaft concerns/questions

I went to the local drive-line shop and ended up purchasing another carrier bearing for the time being.
He was telling me that that a one-piece drive shaft would need to a large diameter as the skinny ones tend to whip/flex in the middle.
He also explained that the carrier bearing allow the shaft to move back and forth like the slip joint (like mention above). But one problem is when you lower the truck your putting allot of stress on the center bearing.
So I'm going to try to determine how much too long my shaft is and see if it's alright with the current setup.

I'm watching my neighbors house while he's away and I took a peak at his 72 step side. It all original and has a one-piece. Could this be because it's a manual transmission?
Should I just leave a note thanking him for the drive shaft?
__________________
1971 GMC Sierra Grande, 1/2 ton short wide, original 4 bolt 010 020 block & heads. (matching #'s). 383 stroker, SMI q jet 750 cfm, Lunati Voodoo 60102 cam, Scorpion roller rockers, Spin Tech pro street mufflers with X pipe.
Sport/Truck is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com