![]() |
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Motor City
Posts: 9,285
|
Re: Why a 2 piece driveshaft?
Quote:
In the GMT400 and GMT800 versions we started using "exotic" materials like aluminum and carbon fibre wraps in larger diameter shafts - all with the motivation of taking some of those two piece applications and turning them into one piece (saving the additional center bearing hardware and complexity). Believe me, the engineers wanted one piece shafts wherever they could get away with it, too. K
__________________
Chevrolet Flint Assembly 1979-1986 GM Full Size Truck Engineering 1986 - 2019 Intro from an Old Assembly Guy: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926 My Pontiac story: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524 Chevelle intro: http://www.superchevy.com/features/s...hevy-chevelle/ Last edited by Keith Seymore; 11-05-2010 at 12:29 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Spanish Fork, Utah
Posts: 209
|
Re: Why a 2 piece driveshaft?
Quote:
That doesn't make any sense to me. If i have the same trans as you but i have 5.14's in the rear the drive shaft spins a lot faster than it would at as say a 2.73 ratio. I had a 3/4 ton 67 with 5.14 posi in rear and it had two pieces. It has to turn 5 times around before the tires turns around once. hence the high rpm at a low speed. Larger engines don't have anything to do with top speed. unless you need tons of power to get to a ridiculous speed. your last gear in your trans is 1:1 unless its an overdrive. Gears in the differential more than anything allow for a higher top speed. Also i was under the impression that it was the short beds that got the one piece. i could be wrong.
__________________
Ben Its a 67 Chevy C10 now, and its short now too. Here is my 1967 Chevy C10 Shortened Build Blog http://boyescustoms.blogspot.com Here is my 1967 Chevy C10 Shortened Build Thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=433535 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Yay Area CA
Posts: 2,329
|
Re: Why a 2 piece driveshaft?
Quote:
Quote:
Often times vehicles with smaller lower torque/hp engines were equip with lower gear ratios to compensate for the lack of power.
__________________
1965 GMC shortwide big window 1969 Chevy C20 long (for now) 2005 Silverado 2500HD Crew Cab Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Independence Mo
Posts: 4,119
|
Re: Why a 2 piece driveshaft?
I've had two shortbeds, one 1972 250 6 cylinder with a turbo 350 all original, and a 1971 250 6 cylinder with a 3 speed manual, and both have had one piece driveshafts. There is not even anyplace for a carrier bearing to mount to on either one. There are holes in the crossmember that the trailing arms bolt to, but it doesn't look like there has ever been anything bolted or rivited to it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Roanoke, Tx.
Posts: 1,561
|
Re: Why a 2 piece driveshaft?
Have a drive shaft shop make a one piece. They will tell you how to measure it. Take the bracket that the carrier bearing bolts out of the truck.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Waverly iowa
Posts: 4
|
Re: Why a 2 piece driveshaft?
I was told by Sadler Powertrain to install yoke into transmission until it bottoms out, measure from center of yoke holes to center of rear housing yoke holes then subtract 1 1/4" for proper clearance.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Winona Lake, IN
Posts: 6,538
|
Re: Why a 2 piece driveshaft?
This IS the correct way to do it.
__________________
70 C/10 SWB 402/TH400/3.73 "The Needy Beast" 200,000 Mile Club Disc Brake Club Owner installed options: Front Sway Bar Power Steering Power Brakes Cigar Lighter Courtesy Lights Deluxe Side Markers Wiper Delay Sliding Rear Window Power Windows Power Locks Sniper EFI 2015 Silverado 1500 LS 4.3/6L80/3.23 lowered 2" front & rear |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Active Member
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Centrally located between Houston, Austin and Waco. BCS area.
Posts: 7,947
|
Re: Why a 2 piece driveshaft?
Quote:
![]() They didn't all come with 2 piece shaft. I've got a 69 Chevy shortbed with coil and single piece. Never been converted. I also have a 68 GMC shortbed with springs single shaft. Also never been converted. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Sierra Grande Club
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Mexico USA
Posts: 2,433
|
Re: Why a 2 piece driveshaft?
Were they manual transmissions by chance?
__________________
1971 GMC Sierra Grande, 1/2 ton short wide, original 4 bolt 010 020 block & heads. (matching #'s). 383 stroker, SMI q jet 750 cfm, Lunati Voodoo 60102 cam, Scorpion roller rockers, Spin Tech pro street mufflers with X pipe. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Its a Truck Thing......
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Posts: 3,179
|
Re: Why a 2 piece driveshaft?
Quote:
Maybe I am due, if they were available..... Smitty
__________________
71 C10 283/3SPD Full Resto 71 GMC 1500 Sierra Grande http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=518599 70 C10 Suburban Former military GSA truck. 72 Chevy Blazer 4X4, Sloppy Jo, Mountain Climber. Wife says no more trucks. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=707378 72 GMC 1 Ton Motor Home, wife said no more trucks until she saw this one. Gen 3 6.0/4L80E 4.10 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=761110 68 GMC Suburban was 3/4 ton, now 1/2.Wife shook her head 71 C30 Wrecker 71 C20 Scott-Bilt As weird as it gets..BB Cheyenne AC Truck 68 GMC Long Stepside. They keep following me home 69 C30 Former Motor Home, Flat Bed time 70 G20 Red-E-Kamp Conversion "I'm your Boogy Van" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: RTP, NC
Posts: 518
|
Re: Why a 2 piece driveshaft?
I had my carrier bearing tear off the frame a few years ago; broke a u-joint & dropped the driveshaft. Had to have new "ears" welded on and a carrier bearing pressed on. Here is the shop that did it: http://www.samwinermotors.com/ excellent shop and very reasonable.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: East Peoria, IL
Posts: 149
|
Re: Why a 2 piece driveshaft?
That makes some sense finally raycow. Thanks...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: East Peoria, IL
Posts: 149
|
Re: Why a 2 piece driveshaft?
Stitch, many cars pulled camping trailers etc. that exceeded 1000 pounds. They put on Reese hitches and overload springs often to pull their camping trailers.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: hingham ma
Posts: 1,721
|
Re: Why a 2 piece driveshaft?
Quote:
at ride height or bumber drag'n. tail drag'n a wagon and tow'n kills ujoints,, and gives a stock 1 piece tube a slight twist to it.. draw a line on a driveshaft in a wagon then tow 1500 miles and look at the line again.. unless you drove like a granma, it's got a slight twist to it.. even light power over wet r/r tracks will do it.. once it starts it only gets worse.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Sierra Grande Club
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Mexico USA
Posts: 2,433
|
Re: Why a 2 piece driveshaft?
This thread has been long over due, and I appreciate such an excellent explanation to why some have different setups.
Sounds like the 2 piece is the better all around choice, as the 1 piece were used on trucks with lower gearing (Probably because it was cost effective). 2 piece was used for trucks that had higher gearing to keep critical mass down. Do I have this correct? s/t
__________________
1971 GMC Sierra Grande, 1/2 ton short wide, original 4 bolt 010 020 block & heads. (matching #'s). 383 stroker, SMI q jet 750 cfm, Lunati Voodoo 60102 cam, Scorpion roller rockers, Spin Tech pro street mufflers with X pipe. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cedar Park, Texas
Posts: 7,500
|
Re: Why a 2 piece driveshaft?
One piece ds' are always a larger diameter to compensate.
I have a 72 SWB step. I swapped in a 700r4. I slipped an old yoke I had into the trans, measured from where the middle of the front yoke would be to the where the middle of the rear yoke would be and got 55 1/2" at ride height. A few weeks back, I came across a Craigslist ad from someone selling a driveshaft out of an 85 Chevy SWB... It was 55 1/2" center to center as well. Last edited by WIDESIDE72; 11-07-2010 at 12:08 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Junior Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wilmington DE
Posts: 218
|
Re: Why a 2 piece driveshaft?
I've allways wondered why people want to go with one peice shafts. I have had 5 of these trucks over the years and only had one carrier bearing go bad. There plenty strong .My truck now has the stock two-peice and I run this truck at the track. 4500lbs, 180 shot of nos and no problems. I just dont see the advantages of a one-peice. my .02 .
__________________
72 cheyenne super BB402 TH400 Air Tack Tilt Posi P/S P/B AM/FM 12.96 @ 101.82 mph 60ft 1.82 12.39 @111.33 With a 180 shot nos 69 Camaro RS http://s94.photobucket.com/albums/l117/fdelcoglin/ email fdelcoglin@hotmail.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cedar Park, Texas
Posts: 7,500
|
Re: Why a 2 piece driveshaft?
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Junior Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wilmington DE
Posts: 218
|
Re: Why a 2 piece driveshaft?
Well I have to say I didn't think about cost on a swap, 35 bucks is hard to beat.
__________________
72 cheyenne super BB402 TH400 Air Tack Tilt Posi P/S P/B AM/FM 12.96 @ 101.82 mph 60ft 1.82 12.39 @111.33 With a 180 shot nos 69 Camaro RS http://s94.photobucket.com/albums/l117/fdelcoglin/ email fdelcoglin@hotmail.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 2,454
|
Re: Why a 2 piece driveshaft?
Quote:
With a one-piece it's easy - just set the rear end angle so the pinion shaft is parallel to the transmission output shaft and you are done. Ray
__________________
Live more responsibly. Eat lower on the food chain. Eat vegetarians. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
gets board easy.......
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 717
|
Re: Why a 2 piece driveshaft?
i always throught it was due to the trailing arm as the pivot and the 2nd u joint being in the same area...
Well i was wrong, but havent had any issues with my 2 piece shafts and even when hard racing no issues |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: jackson
Posts: 676
|
Re: Why a 2 piece driveshaft?
Not to highjack this thread but I just got my 2 piece back from Mr. Driveshaft (3/4 to 1/2 ton conversion) and it seems my second shaft might have been made to short. How much of the front drv shaft spline is showing in front to the rear drv shafts yoke. Mine is 1.25 inches. Seems too much???
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Washington, NC
Posts: 35
|
Re: Why a 2 piece driveshaft?
I know this is an old thread but I'm thinking about installing a single shaft in my truck.
Has anyone had any issues installing a single driveshaft in their lowered truck? Any suggestions on what shaft to use? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: tulsa,ok
Posts: 1,085
|
Re: Why a 2 piece driveshaft?
I have a one piece shaft in my static dropped yellow 69, No problems, I had a local driveshaft shop build mine.
__________________
MY BUILD THREAD http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=423629 1969 custom/10 swb--SOLD 1968 swb 50th anniv.--SOLD 1967 camaro ss/rs..LS-6-speed, 16-year long project 1956 chevy nomad 1955 chevy 210 2-dr sedan 1978 el-camino ss 1-owner |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hoytsville, Utah
Posts: 3,365
|
Re: Why a 2 piece driveshaft?
I thought about converting to a one-piece, but then I decided, why re-invent the wheel? It seems to me if I had to get a larger diameter, I would maybe run into clearance issues where it passes through the member that the trailing arms are connected to.
But I've always had one nagging question about two (or more) piece shafts. Does the carrier bearing(s) ever interfere with the movement of the yoke in the transmission? It looks to me like the carrier bearing is solid, I mean, not intended to have any give, so as the rear end travels up and down, forcing front and back movement onto the driveshaft, does it bind up at the carrier bearing?
__________________
'68 Panel Project Boogie Chillin' '68 C-10 Ol' Green |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|