Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-15-2013, 10:13 PM | #76 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,523
|
Re: 1969 C10 Bagged LS/T56 Build
I am quite glad that you are still responding to this thread - I got my LQ4 in the mail on Monday, and I have been torn on this T56 deal. What vehicle did you get your T56 from? That position looks good to me for the shifter. I am just wanting to not have any mistakes be made on getting this part, and the shifter position be too far back...
Also, thanks for the info above. I have a one-piece Drive Shaft...I am wondering if it will be the same length or will it need to be lengthened/shortened. My original setup is 327 with TH400. I lay frame with no pinion issues before then..
__________________
Best Regards, Leon M. Instagram: @TheDirtyDianah
Bagged | 6.0L LS | T-56 (6-Speed Manual) | Turbo Burnout/Rolling Video: Chevy C10 Stepside 6.0L LSx & 6-Speed Manual |
01-15-2013, 10:46 PM | #77 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 218
|
Re: 1969 C10 Bagged LS/T56 Build
T56 is from a 98-02 Fbody. I like the shifter position, but I doubt you could make it work with a stock bench seat. If you are running buckets, should be good. Stock console would still probably work, but might be a little awkward. Bear in mind that the ECE mounts I used push the engine pretty far forward, so if you are running different mounts, its going to push the shifter location back. The handle I am using has a couple inches of setback to, so there is some room for final adjustments to fit your liking.
My previous combo was a 454 on small block mounts and a TH350. The T56 uses the same yoke as the TH350, but as I recall, I needed to be a few inches shorter with my new combo. I had a custom shaft made since my original was in rough shape. Pretty sure your TH400 uses a different yoke than T56, so you might find it better just to get a shaft made. Want to say mine was $300 shipped to my door including yoke and u joints Forgot to mention, my combo would not clear the stock trailing arm crossmember and Im not even close to laying frame. The T56 output shaft location is much higher than on the old transmissions.
__________________
69 C10 SWB LY6 T56 70 Chevelle SS 396 4spd Last edited by ADub; 01-15-2013 at 10:52 PM. |
01-15-2013, 11:50 PM | #78 |
Still Learning
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Central Oklahoma
Posts: 10,108
|
Re: 1969 C10 Bagged LS/T56 Build
I thought your truck looked familiar, I wish I would have found your thread sooner. Check this out HERE I saw your truck up close in Stillwater. Very cool build! Love it.
Posted via Mobile Device |
01-16-2013, 09:04 AM | #79 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 218
|
Re: 1969 C10 Bagged LS/T56 Build
Thanks. Hoping to do Power Tour again this year, not sure what vehicle since I have to carry a baby seat this time...
__________________
69 C10 SWB LY6 T56 70 Chevelle SS 396 4spd |
05-03-2013, 03:16 PM | #80 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 218
|
Re: 1969 C10 Bagged LS/T56 Build
Been a while since I posted. Had some time this spring to install a wideband and slowly tune the engine. As it sat, it was fat at idle and lean everywhere else. Ended up going two steps on the primaries and up 4 on the secondaries. Still fiddling with the pump shot to get my tip in fueling where I want it. Had a chance to make a few dyno pulls today. My goals were 425rwhp when I built it. After driving it, my butt dyno said it was making around 380.
It made 385/381 uncorrected, 377/373 corrected. Curves were what I hoped for, but would have like to see a bit more peak. Interesting notes. 3 runs were 3 different timing curves, varying by a total of 7 deg. It didnt really care. WOT AFR on the dyno was high 11s to low 12s, which is much fatter than on the street. I tuned it by doing 2nd and 3rd gear pulls and settled at high 12s on WOT AFR. After the dyno trip, I did a 4th gear pull on the highway and what do you know, fat like it was on the dyno. Lower gear pulls were still in the high 12s. So Im sure if I could tune a carb better or threw EFI at it, there are gains to be had, but prob not the 425whp I was going for.
__________________
69 C10 SWB LY6 T56 70 Chevelle SS 396 4spd |
07-16-2013, 06:52 AM | #81 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 55
|
Re: 1969 C10 Bagged LS/T56 Build
Nice project you have there. Are you still using the LY6 cam? If so, maybe swap it out for something a little hotter? Like an LS7 or LS9 cam. They aren't expensive from GM, and they net a good amount of power over other stock LS cams. I bet you can make the 425 whp you're hoping for. Good luck! I may be moving to Houston within the next year! I'm in El Paso right now.
|
07-16-2013, 08:15 AM | #82 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Steeleville, IL
Posts: 47
|
Re: 1969 C10 Bagged LS/T56 Build
Awesome truck!!!
|
07-16-2013, 10:35 PM | #83 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 218
|
Re: 1969 C10 Bagged LS/T56 Build
Quote:
__________________
69 C10 SWB LY6 T56 70 Chevelle SS 396 4spd |
|
07-17-2013, 08:24 AM | #84 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 55
|
Re: 1969 C10 Bagged LS/T56 Build
Quote:
|
|
07-17-2013, 11:14 AM | #85 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 218
|
Re: 1969 C10 Bagged LS/T56 Build
I expect to see a min of 450 at the wheels this time around.
The T56 swap was not particularly difficult, but its not a bolt in project either.
__________________
69 C10 SWB LY6 T56 70 Chevelle SS 396 4spd |
07-19-2013, 09:24 PM | #86 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 55
|
Re: 1969 C10 Bagged LS/T56 Build
The hardest problem I'm having right now is sourcing one for my truck. It has a 250 in it, and I may end up keeping the 250 for a long time. There's a lot of talk about how the LS-based T56 won't work, but the LT1-based one is better suited for a 1-piece rear-main seal on the block.
|
07-20-2013, 11:27 PM | #87 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,523
|
Re: 1969 C10 Bagged LS/T56 Build
I need to do the dyno tuning next. So far, enjoying.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
Best Regards, Leon M. Instagram: @TheDirtyDianah
Bagged | 6.0L LS | T-56 (6-Speed Manual) | Turbo Burnout/Rolling Video: Chevy C10 Stepside 6.0L LSx & 6-Speed Manual |
09-01-2013, 03:14 PM | #88 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sunny, Florida, some might call it South Alabama
Posts: 834
|
Re: 1969 C10 Bagged LS/T56 Build
Dub would you do me a favor a post a picture of the interior of your truck now, mainly where the seats sit and how the shifter looks in comparison to someone sitting in it? Also also, does it feel pretty natural the way you have your's set up(seats and shifter location) or is it a bit uncomfortable/awkward? Thank you...I'm thinking of doing a similar swap just wanna get all the ideas that I can.
__________________
Just sold my C10...sad day... Looking for a 1972 Blazer to hopefully fill the hole in my heart. |
09-01-2013, 03:17 PM | #89 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sunny, Florida, some might call it South Alabama
Posts: 834
|
Re: 1969 C10 Bagged LS/T56 Build
Nevermind, I found the pictures of page 2, I apologize
__________________
Just sold my C10...sad day... Looking for a 1972 Blazer to hopefully fill the hole in my heart. |
09-02-2013, 02:28 PM | #90 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 218
|
Re: 1969 C10 Bagged LS/T56 Build
I am very pleased with the shifter position. I think the seating position is about as good as you can get for a guy my size on the cheap. Clutching action isn't my favorite, but thats not really a fault of the seats.
__________________
69 C10 SWB LY6 T56 70 Chevelle SS 396 4spd |
11-26-2014, 03:27 PM | #91 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Duluth, GA
Posts: 314
|
Re: 1969 C10 Bagged LS/T56 Build
thread revival:::: nice build. any pics of the musclecar pan in relation to the crossmember? my pan setup is what is keepin me from droppin the lq4 in my truck right now.....been tryna source an fbody pan for a deal but if this pan will in fact work and sit higher...i will save money going with it.
|
11-26-2014, 08:00 PM | #92 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 218
|
Re: 1969 C10 Bagged LS/T56 Build
The x member is the lower than pan. This is with the ECE mounts, may not be the same with other setups.
From front From side
__________________
69 C10 SWB LY6 T56 70 Chevelle SS 396 4spd |
01-07-2015, 09:32 PM | #93 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 349
|
Re: 1969 C10 Bagged LS/T56 Build
How did you plumb the burb tank for fuel injection?
Just ran an aeromotive in line? |
01-07-2015, 09:34 PM | #94 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 218
|
Re: 1969 C10 Bagged LS/T56 Build
With a carburetor....
__________________
69 C10 SWB LY6 T56 70 Chevelle SS 396 4spd |
01-08-2015, 12:47 AM | #95 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 349
|
Re: 1969 C10 Bagged LS/T56 Build
Indeed. Carry on.
|
11-22-2015, 09:04 PM | #96 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Ocean Springs, MS
Posts: 43
|
Re: 1969 C10 Bagged LS/T56 Build
You said "modified" trans mount. Did you use the factory one?
|
11-23-2015, 08:39 AM | #97 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 218
|
Re: 1969 C10 Bagged LS/T56 Build
I used the stock auto xmember and added a spacer in between the xmember and the actual transmission mount to match up to the pinion angle I was working with. As I recall, I used 1-1/4" heavy wall square tubing, but the height will be different depending on your motor mounts, trans, ride height etc.
__________________
69 C10 SWB LY6 T56 70 Chevelle SS 396 4spd |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|