The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-25-2004, 03:49 PM   #1
pat
Senior Member
 
pat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Lindsay, TX
Posts: 1,245
Question Are "lowered shocks" really necessary?

My truck is going to have the geometry changed 2 inches in the front and 3 in the back. Do I need to mess with getting some shocks for a lowered application or should I just buy regular ones?
Thanks
__________________
68 Chevy 383/350 w/shift kit, 380hp/425ft-lbs, 4.5/5 drop, 17" TT2s
64 Cadillac Sedan DeVille
pat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2004, 04:08 PM   #2
ChevLoRay
Old Skool Club
 
ChevLoRay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Benton, AR "The Heart of Arkansas"
Posts: 10,880
I have spindles from Early Classic, that dropped my front end by 2.5 inches. I used stock height springs and stock length shocks on the front.
In the rear, I have 4-inch shorter springs, shock relocator mounts, adjustable track bar and shorter shocks.

Shocks should be long enough, yet short enough to function. If they are too long, they won't have enough travel. For a 2-inch drop, you can probably get by with the stock shock. I'd say that any thing greater than that, and you should check into getting the shorter ones.
__________________
Member Nr. 2770

'96 GMC Sportside; 4.3/SLT - Daily driven....constantly needs washed.

'69 C-10 SWB; 350/TH400 - in limbo

The older I get, the better I was.
ChevLoRay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2004, 04:32 PM   #3
LONGHAIR
just can't cover up my redneck
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 11,414
Geometry change? meaning ride height?

There is no geometry change in using spindles and very little in a 2" spring drop(front or rear).
LONGHAIR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2004, 09:49 PM   #4
ShamrockCustoms
Project56 on hold
 
ShamrockCustoms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Burleson, TX
Posts: 489
I would recommend shorter shocks for the rear. The front should be ok if only 2" drop.
__________________
Shamrock Customs
Forever-in-the-Future Custom Shop


2009 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS daily driver
1956 Chevy Stepside rodstoration on winter hold
ShamrockCustoms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2004, 10:41 PM   #5
smitty62
Registered User
 
smitty62's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,234
Rear: Reverse differential/shock mount plates (left to right, etc.) turning them upside down. You'll have to heat and pound flange down for a flush mount. This will gain you approximately 2-3" allowing you to use stock shocks. Look under there and you'll see what I mean--lot easier than it sounds. For the front........I haven't worked that out yet, but you know that no one is making shocks just for the front of lowered '67/'72 pickups--they're using something off the shelf and doubling the price for a "special" shock
__________________


Stepsides look like real trucks!
Smitty

smitty62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2004, 02:17 PM   #6
XXL
Seņor Member
 
XXL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Edge of the world
Posts: 5,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by smitty62
but you know that no one is making shocks just for the front of lowered '67/'72 pickups--they're using something off the shelf and doubling the price for a "special" shock
Nobody really makes specialty shocks for anything... it's just an interchange issue (there are a few exceptions in the "high end" space). 20 years ago I was offering "lowered" shocks through my shop in North Texas. Basically I sat down for a few days with some shock manufacturer spec books and "reverse engineered" existing part numbers that met my needs (shorter, similar valving, similar/changeable mount types, etc.), bought them wholesale, and epoxy painted them a different color. Voila... "lowered shock."

To address the OP's question, if spindles only, there's no need to change the front shocks. For the rear 3" drop, smitty62 has the cheapest/best solution. If you go much more than 3" you'll want to either shell out for a "lowered" shock or expect to bottom them out from time to time (which is realllllllly hard on them).
XXL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2004, 04:43 PM   #7
pat
Senior Member
 
pat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Lindsay, TX
Posts: 1,245
I have 2.5 inch drop spindles and 2 inch drop springs in the front.
In the rear are 3 inch drop springs and 2 inch drop blocks.

Thanks for the input. If I went to an auto parts store, how am I going to know what shock to get? I dont know any measurements to tell them.
__________________
68 Chevy 383/350 w/shift kit, 380hp/425ft-lbs, 4.5/5 drop, 17" TT2s
64 Cadillac Sedan DeVille
pat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2004, 05:39 PM   #8
Tx Firefighter
Watch out for your cornhole !
 
Tx Firefighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Azle, Texas
Posts: 14,162
The 2 inch blocks in the rear are invisible as far as shocks go. The springs will shorten shock travel, the blocks won't. Think about it, the shocks mount below the rear arms and the blocks simply raise the axle higher above the rear arms.
__________________
I'm on the Instagram- @Gearhead_Kevin
Tx Firefighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2004, 11:54 AM   #9
ante_up13
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Here
Posts: 167
I just bought the lowered shocks for my 69...what dimensions are you looking for...maybe I can help
ante_up13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2004, 08:39 PM   #10
pat
Senior Member
 
pat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Lindsay, TX
Posts: 1,245
ante_up13, can you tell me what you bought? Im not sure of my dimensions but just know that it is about 2" lower in front and 3" in the back.
__________________
68 Chevy 383/350 w/shift kit, 380hp/425ft-lbs, 4.5/5 drop, 17" TT2s
64 Cadillac Sedan DeVille
pat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2004, 10:25 PM   #11
darcane
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 414
With only a 2/3 drop (No point in worrying about the spindles or blocks) I would just go with stock shocks. I had whatever shocks NAPA had in their books on my '68 C10 shortbed with a 2"/4" drop and never once bottomed them out in the 8 years or so that I had it like that. And I drove on some nasty roads...

In the front with your 2" drop, the travel of the shock is only going to be reduced by about 3/4 of an inch because of where the shock is placed. In the back, it will be reduced by about 3", but I'm sure the shock is designed to allow a lot of extra travel in that direction. If it wasn't, the shock would bottom out when the truck was hauling a really heavy load.
__________________
Mike Lackey
'68 C10
darcane is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com