07-11-2005, 12:09 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 1,255
|
Tahoe seats $40
Went to a swap meet today in Stockton CA. Finally found a 18" 7-blade fan that will hopefully work. Also picked up a flywheel cover now I can give back the chromie a Chickenwing gave me. At the end of the day we took one last cruise of the swap meet. My buddy found some 50 Olds stuff and sitting amongst the remains was two leather seats with "Tahoe Seats $50" on a piece of tape. These are the seats that can be pulled out. To make it short after a lengthy conversation I offered him $40 and he hesitated until he saw the two twentys. I could not believe it a pair of new Tahoe leather seats with 3-point seat belts for $40. I already have many thoughts how to use them and the ideas keep growing. I need to get the pieces from a Tahoe that the seats anchor to. Get some adjustable sliders that can be mounted to a metal box built to fit on the cab floor and mount the Tahoe hardware to the sliders. The seats can be removed easily if I use the same Tahoe hardware. The metal box can also be used for storage. There should be approximately 10 inches between the seats so I need to design a fold down arm rest / cup holder plus a removable seat section for a third person. Hopefully this will work well. I will give progress reports as the project comes to life.
__________________
Got bored, sold everthing. Got bored, looking for a 1960-66 C-10. Want to build my last truck. |
07-11-2005, 12:11 AM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 1,255
|
[QUOTE=tomatocity]additional pictures
__________________
Got bored, sold everthing. Got bored, looking for a 1960-66 C-10. Want to build my last truck. |
07-11-2005, 12:20 AM | #3 |
Keepin an eye out
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: So.Cal
Posts: 3,920
|
Cant beat that price
__________________
1970 Chevy C10 SWB 5.3 1996 Toyota Tacoma SR5 4x4 2007 Vespa GTS 250 Scooter ZIP 91351 |
07-11-2005, 12:25 AM | #4 |
Lovin' Life in Miss.!
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Puckett, Mississippi
Posts: 1,937
|
Pretty cool Tim. Those are 3rd row seats if I am not mistaken. You can come over and look at my wifes Tahoe to verify. Think Stingray had some safety concerns about seat mods. Don;t have a link to the post but maybe someone else does. Seems like main concern was the seat submarining through the floor. Changing the brackets, first thing that comes to mind is additional strength required for the integral sholder-belts.
__________________
The truck... you hear that? No really, you did hear that?!!! |
07-11-2005, 12:25 AM | #5 |
User #12137
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: kingsport,upper east tenn
Posts: 11,598
|
glad you found the fan cause i didnt have one and you got a killer deal on the seats
|
07-11-2005, 12:29 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bay Area, Northern California
Posts: 1,344
|
Yes, those are third row seats. A three seater, but pulls out in equal halves.
__________________
03 Tahoe 72 GMC Super Custom 2500 Custom Camper, my reliable workhorse. Dual gauged tanks, dual battery trays. |
07-11-2005, 12:51 AM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lake Crystal, MN
Posts: 656
|
What a deal.
__________________
-Cory 1967 2 Wheel Chevy |
07-11-2005, 12:53 AM | #8 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 1,255
|
Quote:
__________________
Got bored, sold everthing. Got bored, looking for a 1960-66 C-10. Want to build my last truck. |
|
07-11-2005, 12:57 AM | #9 |
Lovin' Life in Miss.!
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Puckett, Mississippi
Posts: 1,937
|
Those seat use 4 anchor points per seat. Will look around for the reffered post... Think one of the guys chiming in IS an honest to God auto seat engineer.
__________________
The truck... you hear that? No really, you did hear that?!!! |
07-11-2005, 01:31 AM | #10 |
Cantankerous Geezer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bel Aire, KS
Posts: 6,264
|
I'm not a seat engineer and don't know the crash loads for those seats, but I can tell you that in a wreck all those belts will do is hold you in the seat while the floor of your truck is ripped out. If the seat's big enough, it will keep you from flying out the windshield. Major reinforcing will be needed. I would start with a doubler on the floor and some angle to add some stiffness. And this all needs tied in to the cab supports.
__________________
Fred There is no such thing as too much cam...just not enough engine. |
07-11-2005, 01:54 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: LAX area, So Cal
Posts: 499
|
You can sell those 3rd row seats for a ton of cash!!!! They are a hot item!! Cannot buy them from the dealers. Latest thing in CA (likely other states too) is have those 3rd row seats stolen....they leave the DVD players, stereos etc and just take the seats.....put them up on ebay and make a bunch of profit!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...984391260&rd=1
__________________
1972 Suburban C20 454/TH700R4, eaton-corporate 4.10 (looking for 3.7) Sold: 71 Cheyenne 20 Installed a 99 5.7L L31/4L60E from Suburban 1500 (2005) Last edited by Tim240Z; 07-11-2005 at 02:24 AM. |
07-11-2005, 08:16 AM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winters Ca. 95694
Posts: 4,843
|
Quote:
Kevin Winters Ca |
|
07-11-2005, 08:52 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 2,272
|
Are you any good at welding in cab repair panels? Sent you a PM
|
07-11-2005, 12:44 PM | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Vermont
Posts: 8,537
|
What about building your metal storage compartment and finding a bone yard burb or tahoe and cutting the floor out of it to weld to metal compartment?
Just a thought, the seat attatchments would be done. Great score on the seats! |
07-12-2005, 03:29 PM | #15 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 1,255
|
Quote:
__________________
Got bored, sold everthing. Got bored, looking for a 1960-66 C-10. Want to build my last truck. |
|
07-12-2005, 04:20 PM | #16 |
More Cowbell....
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Puckett, MS
Posts: 3,569
|
Take a cordless Sawsall. Or have the yard burn it out with the torch, and you can trim it up once you get it home!!
__________________
There once was a member from Puckett.....Who ( fill in the blank blank blank ) bucket |
07-12-2005, 04:45 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Saskatoon,SK,Canada
Posts: 2,476
|
Like said by Fred and Chickenwing the integral seatbelts make them an animal of their own and the floor may not support the seat belt loads. GM engineering and OE parts have NOTHING to do with being able to install them safely. These trucks in the best of condition do not have floors designed to witstand the kind of loading modern integral belts will impose on them. The only way to know would be to spend 50 grand getting them tested or to literally bet your life ( or your wife/kids/friends) and drive your truck head on into a brick wall or oncoming traffic at 50MPH to see if you survive or not. Way too many mods get made to vehicles with no regard as to whether it is sound engineering. If you are not absolutely certain an engineer will look at it say "ahh probably won't kill ya" then don't do it.
__________________
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada |
07-12-2005, 05:44 PM | #18 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 1,255
|
Or I could stay with the standard lap belt and we know how safe they are.
__________________
Got bored, sold everthing. Got bored, looking for a 1960-66 C-10. Want to build my last truck. |
07-12-2005, 05:50 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Saskatoon,SK,Canada
Posts: 2,476
|
Your are alot safer attached to the vehicle in the stock belt than you are to a seat that isn't attached to the vehicle. The stock bucket trucks actually have floor reinforcments above and beyond the bench trucks. They don't even have integral belts. I actually do this stuff for a living and yes I actually do know how safe they are.
__________________
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada |
07-12-2005, 06:21 PM | #20 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Vermont
Posts: 8,537
|
Quote:
If the newer seats are installed onto the factory bucket supports, would that help more? Don't take this as picking on your info/input, just trying to learn here. |
|
07-12-2005, 06:50 PM | #21 |
Lovin' Life in Miss.!
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Puckett, Mississippi
Posts: 1,937
|
StingRay, you have a link to the post I was refering to? I searched the site with google and can't find it. Pretty good discussion. Main point of interest I remember was some type of limiter to restrict downward movement of the front of the seat.
Kinda hoping you could add something else to the post like "I totally don;t recommend this but if you just HAVE to install it you should think about X..."
__________________
The truck... you hear that? No really, you did hear that?!!! |
07-12-2005, 07:03 PM | #22 |
Old School, New Style
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Monroeville, Ohio
Posts: 790
|
All this talk about seatbelt safety made me think about my childhood. I can remember clear as day the station wagon rides as a kid. We NEVER wore seatbelts, NEVER had a car seat as a baby. My parents never wore seatbelts either, still don't to this day.
Now I know we were very lucky but in my opinion (Im sure not shared by all) any seatbelt is better than nun at all. If you are in accident that is bad enough to rip the seat from the floor then you are in serious trouble anyhow. While I agree that safety is nothing to mess with and that OE has been engineered and tested, nothing is perfect. We had an accident 2 weeks ago in the area where the gentleman was partially ejected from his car even though he was wearing a belt. The shoulder harness anchor broke. He did not suffer one broken bone or any internal bleading but from the last I heard he was more or less brain dead from hitting his head on something. I wonder what test procedures were used in 67-72 for seatbelt safety. I bet that the requirements were not near what is required by todays standards. Just take a look at the mounting points and configuration in one of our rigs. Does not look very beefy to me. I guess right or wrong we risk our lives every day just leaving our driveway. Aaron
__________________
The Good: - 72 GMC Jimmy 4x4 - 307 cid / 350 th - 70 Chevy Suburban 1/2T 2wd - 454 cid /400 th - 96 Chevy Impala SS - mainly stock - 98 Chevy Tahoe LT 4x4 - all stock The Bad: - 86 Chevy Suburban 1/2T 4x4 - winter beater The Ugly: - 72 Chevy Suburban 1/2T 2wd - parts truck Last edited by Long Roof; 07-12-2005 at 07:09 PM. |
07-12-2005, 07:21 PM | #23 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 1,255
|
Quote:
Getting back to the lap belt vs the third row seats. If you were driving 65 MPH and hit a parked truck what would happen to you with lap belts or the third row seats. Lap belts: barring a miracle you are dead because your face and head smashed into the steering wheel. Third row seats: if installed incorrectly, same result as lap belts. If installed correctly with reinforced floors, strong floor box, and GM mounting brackets, you stand a chance though probably will have some damage but your face and head should not contact the steering wheel. The shoulder strap is the difference. Now how do we design a reinforced floor, strong floor box, and mounting hardware. I think using the original floorboard and mounting hardware, as suggested by VT, is an excellent idea. The floor box should be built from heavy " [ " angle iron with strong welds. How to attach these two items? What to use to reinforce the floors? Identify the problem(s) and create a solution. StingRay, VT, Rich, anyone else, what do you think? All information is valuable we just need the time and space to use (test) it. Cost? I am thinking $100 to complete the safe installation.
__________________
Got bored, sold everthing. Got bored, looking for a 1960-66 C-10. Want to build my last truck. |
|
07-12-2005, 08:36 PM | #24 | |
Seņor Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Edge of the world
Posts: 5,367
|
Quote:
Great addition to the living room. You might try them on the front porch as well, but be careful about the leather getting wet.
__________________
|
|
07-12-2005, 09:16 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Saskatoon,SK,Canada
Posts: 2,476
|
I wouldn't install seats with integral belts. At work we avoid them specifically because of the concentrated loads and the difficulty involved in retrofitting them into applications not originally intended for them. I personally will be using 67/68 CST buckets with 3 point harness into factory locations. I am going to sound a bit rude here but some of the members with thicker skulls (and this is directed at quite a number of members that have made similar statements over the years when this topic comes up) seem to think well if the accident is that bad you're screwed anyway. NOT if you have proper belts, seat and mountings. Factory seat anchors only have to restrain the weight of the seat multiplied by the number of G's (multiples of gravity) of force applied in the accident. In a head on for example there is a combination of shear and tension on the seat mounting hardware at the rear and shear and compression at the front. The seat weighs say about 60 lbs. Add integral belts and now you ask the mounting to handle in some case say 3 300lb adults ( this is a real and easy possibility) now you have 1000 lbs times the number of g's of force. The seat belts and their mountings used to be restraining all of that and virtually all in tension and all from engineered and tested anchor points. To top it all off now you have shoulder belt loads that pull on the seat back trying to create a moment around the center of gravity( a much higher center of gravity) of the loaded seat which will be trying to pull the rear wimpy bolts up through the floor and trying to ram the front of seat through the floor. With factory belts the bodies in the cab were simply suspended in tension by the belts. No large forces exerted on the seat mountings. So do you think GM engineered the floors of our trucks 16 times stroger than required? I wouldn't bet my life on it and I personally wouldn't install integral belt seats without a ton of floor reinforcement. Lets assume you use all of the rear floor attachments for seat and belts to hold your new seat in. This would help alot at the back. The front still has the potential to be far too weak to keep the front of the seat from pounding it's way through the floor. As to the solution I'm not even gonna try because I don't agree with it in the first place. If I installed a seat like I know many have I'd never let anybody I cared about ride in the truck.
__________________
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|