The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-09-2005, 10:42 AM   #1
mplex2000
Registered User
 
mplex2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: DFW
Posts: 463
Good Price Heads Up Boys And Girls!!!

I order a lot of stuff from this company for both my Chevys and Hondas. They've got a special on S&B air filters now, and they're perfect for our trucks. I think the other brands K&N, Accel, even Summit are upwards of $40 for most 14" diameter round filters.

Hope you all save some money like I did!


http://www.bakerprecision.com/snbsale.htm

mplex2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2005, 10:53 AM   #2
stllookn
Saving 1 truck at a time!
 
stllookn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kent, WA
Posts: 6,465
Is that a washable filter like the K&N and Air Hog?
__________________
'68 C20 Longhorn 50th Anniversary 400/TH400
'68 C20 Longhorn 50th Anniversary 468/TH400w/buckets
'72 C20 Halfhorn (Longhorn w/o cab and front clip)
'69 Flxible Cruiser (look up ugly in the dictionary)
stllookn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2005, 11:07 AM   #3
mplex2000
Registered User
 
mplex2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: DFW
Posts: 463
Yep, oiled gauze. And if you ask S&B, theirs is the best, of course

Seriously though, they're great filters.

http://www.sbfilters.com/

Last edited by mplex2000; 09-09-2005 at 11:08 AM.
mplex2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2005, 11:57 AM   #4
boraxman
Keepin an eye out
 
boraxman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: So.Cal
Posts: 3,920
Wow great price, too bad I cant use one

Hows the shipping charges?
__________________
1970 Chevy C10 SWB 5.3
1996 Toyota Tacoma SR5 4x4
2007 Vespa GTS 250 Scooter
ZIP 91351

Last edited by boraxman; 09-09-2005 at 12:03 PM.
boraxman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2005, 01:23 PM   #5
mplex2000
Registered User
 
mplex2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: DFW
Posts: 463
UPS Ground, I don't believe they upcharge. I went ahead and ordered a bunch of other stuff I needed to make the shipping more worthwhile, but hell even if they charged $10 to ship it you'd still be under half price of a K&N at the store! Got to love it..
mplex2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2005, 03:51 PM   #6
chickenwing
Lovin' Life in Miss.!
 
chickenwing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Puckett, Mississippi
Posts: 1,937
This type of filter has came up in discussion before. Saved the link another member posted. Won't say anything bad. Just let the facts speak for themselves. http://home.usadatanet.net/~jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htm
chickenwing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2005, 04:01 PM   #7
mplex2000
Registered User
 
mplex2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: DFW
Posts: 463
Been using them for 15 years though man. Never once had an engine go bad on me using gauze filters.

If you look in the current issue of Muscle Car there is yet another test which indicates the opposite of what you just posted, which is an increase in horsepower(they don't test filtration, only dyno tests).

Most tests I've seen show that an oiled gauze filter filters better AND flows better than the paper.

I guess everyone needs to make up their own minds, and of course I don't care if you like them or buy them, but my experience with them has been nothing but good. I have one in my 04 Tahoe, my 01 Galant, my turbo Civic and now on my 350 truck. MPG went up by 2 on the Galant after I installed the K&N panel, btw.

This guy did not dyno the filters, but continues to say that paper filters perform the same as gauze on the dyno. Oh well.

Enjoy everybody!

Last edited by mplex2000; 09-09-2005 at 04:07 PM.
mplex2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2005, 09:09 PM   #8
junkyardjohn
Registered User
 
junkyardjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SOMERSET KY.
Posts: 6,425
I'VE BEEN USING THEM FOR AT LEAST 15 YEARS ALSO, WITH NO PROBLEM. I GUESS I'LL HAVE TO GO WITH MY OWN REAL WORLD EXPERIANCE, & NOT SOME EXPERTS OPINION. JOHN
(THANKS FOR THE INFO )
__________________
junkyardjohn
69 1 TON TOW TRUCK //
84 4WD CUCV BLAZER// 85 1 TON 4WD STAKE TRUCK// 86 M1031 5/4 TON 4WD CUCV// ALOT OF OLD TRUCKS FOR ONE OLD MAN TO DRIVE. THERES ROOM FOR ALL OF GODS CREATURES RIGHT NEXT TO MY MASHED POTATOES//
LIFE MEMBER OF P.E.T.A (PEOPLE EATING TASTY ANIMALS)

DON'T RENT U-HAUL

ALWAYS TELL THE TRUTH
IT WILL AMAZE PART OF THE PEOPLE & ASTONISH THE REST

Last edited by junkyardjohn; 09-09-2005 at 09:11 PM.
junkyardjohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2005, 09:59 PM   #9
screamin_c102
Account Suspended
 
screamin_c102's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Yoncalla Oregon
Posts: 775
Hey Mplex I like your user title, kinda matches mine

Wonder where ya got it from

Thanks for the heads up on the inexpensive filters.
screamin_c102 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com