The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-26-2002, 06:58 PM   #1
Blk70
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 33
Post carb question

Hey guys, just wondering if you can give me some help. I would like to replace the stock quadrajet carb I have on my stock 350. Before I talk to the so called specialists, I would like to ask the real gurus on this board. Would the Edelbrock performer series be good? Do I need a special adapter for the spread bore manifold? What CFM would be ideal for an everyday driver? 600 cfm/750? Any suggestions would be extremely welcome. Thanks all.
__________________
1970 GMC Shortbed
350 Chevy/Automatic
Blk70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2002, 07:05 PM   #2
68SWB4x4
Strongman Garage
 
68SWB4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 10,241
Post

for a stock 350 go with the 600, the edelbrock is a very good carb, bolt it on and go..... if putting it on a stock manifold you will need an adaptor

------------------
My Truck pictures

www.xframeimpala.com

68 4x4 short fleetside 327 CH465 edelbrock intake and carb MSD distributor its the "SHAGROLET"
56 big window short stepside 235 dual 1 brls
64ImpalaSS 327
70 C10 LWB fleetside custom/10 350/TH350
IM me on aol SN= SHAGROLET

68SWB4x4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2002, 07:10 PM   #3
misfits
Registered User
 
misfits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Sturgeon Bay , WI USA
Posts: 375
Post

I think edelbrock makes a spread bore replacement. I would reccomend getting a edelbrock, I personally don't like holleys they take alot of adjusting to keep them running decent.
misfits is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2002, 07:20 PM   #4
pierce
Registered User
 
pierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Cincinnati,OH,USA
Posts: 464
Post

I agree with the Edelbrock. The 1901 Edelbrock replaces the Quadrajet on the 350, the stock fuel line and accel cable fit with no mods.

------------------
72 Chevy Blazer
69 GMC Longhorn
37 Chevy Coupe
pics at http://home.fuse.net/pierce
Cincinnati, OH
__________________
69 GMC 1 Ton Longhorn
37 Chevy Coupe
pierce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2002, 07:30 PM   #5
Gordo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Killingworth, CT. USA
Posts: 3,378
Talking

Heck,,,go for the Edelbrock performer intake too,,,(sans EGR) it's only another $100.00. The 600 cfm will perform nicely on that 350. I recomend going with the electric choke also.

------------------
1971 C10 swb stepside 350/700R4/3.73posi
Killingworth, Connecticut
__________________
1971 C10 swb stepside 350/700R4/3.73posi (retired as of 4/22/03)
1998 S10 short bed
2002 S10 Blazer
1942 Oldsmobile
1958 Massey Harris Pony
1951 Wife
Killingworth, Connecticut

May those who love us, love us, any of those who do not love us, may God turn their hearts.
And if God is unable to turn their hearts, may he turn their ankles so we may know them by their limping.

A man who works with his hands is a laborer; a man who works with his hands and his brain is a craftsman; but a man who works with his hands and his brain and his heart is an artist.
Gordo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2002, 07:35 PM   #6
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
Post

If you get that carb, you will NEED a spacer. It'll run like crap without it. I was able to bolt one onto a stok intake, but the extra 100 bones is well spent on the intake. When I slippefd the new intake under that carb it was night and day differance.

------------------
'69 G.M.C. 350/350. Trying to clean up the left over damage from the Dope-Smokin-Old-Man
I've been dubbed the Longhorn Freak/Fanatic/Expert, I just hope I can live up to it.
FINALLY got the HORNIAC...a '70 one ton Longhorn with a Pontiac 350/350 and lots of 'personality'. Check out The Longhorn Webite.
If you need a pic posted, E-mail me at longhornmail@yahoo.com
Andy, in Columbus Ohio


Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2002, 07:37 PM   #7
misfits
Registered User
 
misfits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Sturgeon Bay , WI USA
Posts: 375
Post

are you talkin about putting a square bore carb on a spread bore manifold?

[This message has been edited by misfits (edited April 26, 2002).]
misfits is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2002, 08:23 PM   #8
MikeB
Senior Member
 
MikeB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: North Texas
Posts: 3,571
Smile

Just to clear things up a bit for you, the 600 cfm Performer carb is P/N 1406 with electric choke; P/N 1405 without. These carbs require their P/N 2696 adapter for your stock manifold. Edelbrock's P/N 1901 is an aftermarket 750 cfm Quadrajet, but costs very big bucks.

------------------
MikeB
69 C-10 Fleetside, mild 383, Dart Iron Eagle 180cc heads, Crane Energizer 266 cam and 1.6 roller rockers, Edelbrock Performer manifold and 600cfm carb, HEI w/ MSD components, 1986 front spindles/disc brakes, Vintage Air in-dash, lowered 2"/3".
__________________
Mike
1969 C10 LWB -- owned for 35 years. 350/TH350, 3.08 posi, 1st Gen Vintage Air, AAW wiring harness, 5-lug conversion, 1985 spindles and brakes.
1982 C10 SWB -- sold
1981 C10 Silverado LWB -- sold, but wish I still had it!
1969 C10 (not the current one) that I bought in the early 1980s. Paid $1200; sold for $1500 a few years later. Just a hint at the appreciation that was coming.
Retired as a factory automation products salesman.
Worked part-time over the years for an engine builder and a classic car repair shop.
Member here for 24 years! This is the very first car/truck Internet forum I joined. I still used a dial-up modem back then!
MikeB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2002, 08:34 PM   #9
Blk70
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 33
Post

Thanks all for the informative replies. Misfits, I couldn't tell you the benefits/disadvantages of the sqaure bore vs. spread bore, can you elaborate a little more. I am definetly leaning toward the performer series because of the reduced costs, rather than the Q-jet replacement form Edelbrock. Rather would save the money toward my ultimate goal of a nicely stoked 383 stroker. Thanks again all.
__________________
1970 GMC Shortbed
350 Chevy/Automatic
Blk70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2002, 11:46 PM   #10
J
Registered User
 
J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Yuma, AZ
Posts: 164
Post

Well I've got a holley 750 spreadbore double pumper and I HATE it it is the biggest piece of... I am going to switch to a 600 electric choke Edlebrock and proformer intake. As for the differnce, on a spreadbore the rear barrels are bigger. Supposedly it will give you better gas mileage if you only use the first two. I don't know if thats true but if it is I don't care I hate that holley so much.
__________________
'72 C-10
'99 Silverado
'91 S-Dime
J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2002, 12:09 AM   #11
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
Post

It bolted on.

------------------
'69 G.M.C. 350/350. Trying to clean up the left over damage from the Dope-Smokin-Old-Man
I've been dubbed the Longhorn Freak/Fanatic/Expert, I just hope I can live up to it.
FINALLY got the HORNIAC...a '70 one ton Longhorn with a Pontiac 350/350 and lots of 'personality'. Check out The Longhorn Webite.
If you need a pic posted, E-mail me at longhornmail@yahoo.com
Andy, in Columbus Ohio


Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2002, 02:06 PM   #12
greasemonkey
Registered User
 
greasemonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 2,155
Post

I am planning on eventually getting a Performer or Performer RPM carb and manifold, but I don't know what choke to get, I've heard so many conflicting opinions.
__________________
1942 Master Deluxe
1969 C/10
1985 Blazer CUCV
1987 Jimmy
2004 Tahoe
2005 Silverado 1500
2005 Silverado 3500
greasemonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2002, 02:18 PM   #13
69 longhorn
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: rock island,il,usa
Posts: 5,382
Post

The elect choke equipped carbs are set up leaner than the hand choke versions. I would say , for a daily driver.....go for the elc choke. For a more perf set up, the hand choke is my choice. Either can be recalibrated,so its a matter of whether you feel like bolting the carb on,or you are willing to tune it........69 longhorn.
__________________
http://community.webshots.com/user/hotrodhorn
69 longhorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2002, 02:35 PM   #14
greasemonkey
Registered User
 
greasemonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 2,155
Post

OK, thanks! I think the electric choke will be the one to go with, this is going to be a daily driver with a little more power than the average DD but not a dragster or anything.
__________________
1942 Master Deluxe
1969 C/10
1985 Blazer CUCV
1987 Jimmy
2004 Tahoe
2005 Silverado 1500
2005 Silverado 3500
greasemonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com