|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-14-2007, 11:31 PM
|
#1 |
|
Alright Alright Alright
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Midland, Texas
Posts: 1,672
|
ramhorns vs log (73+) style exh mainfolds
i was wondering if there was a huge difference between ramhorns and the 73 and up log style manifolds. i know that the ramhorns are the best flowing, but it is worth the swap. im buying a chevy sport van that has the log style and i have a set of ramhorns lying around.
__________________
1972 Cheyenne Chevrolet red and white 357ci, Vortec heads, GM Performance high rise intake, Comp 268H .454/.454 218/218 110 LSA Quadrajet carb, Flowtech headers, 2.25 40 series HEI, Curve kit, TH 350, 3.07 gears 275/60/15s on 15x8 rallies |
|
|
|
04-15-2007, 12:32 AM
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Idaho
Posts: 4,034
|
Re: ramhorns vs log (73+) style exh mainfolds
Rams all the way!!!!!!!!!!!!1
__________________
"Remember, They can Kill You, but they can't eat You, That's against the law!!!!!!!!!" |
|
|
|
|
04-15-2007, 06:58 AM
|
#3 |
|
Watch out for your cornhole !
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Azle, Texas
Posts: 14,162
|
Re: ramhorns vs log (73+) style exh mainfolds
You can't run the log style manifolds on our trucks. Look at your engine mounts. The manifolds that run below the ports will hit them. The manifolds have to be the type that run above the ports to clear.
__________________
I'm on the Instagram- @Gearhead_Kevin |
|
|
|
|
04-15-2007, 07:07 AM
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bakersfield,CA
Posts: 7,893
|
Re: ramhorns vs log (73+) style exh mainfolds
the ramhorn or centerdumps are considered perfornmance manifolds
i would run them over the log style, better power and probly better mpg
__________________
-steven Alte Seele S.S. "Allison" '72 C/10 LWB 350SB/TH350 - DD PITBULL IS NOT A CRIME |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
