The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


View Poll Results: Which engine is better?
GM PP HT383 13 61.90%
Smeding Perfomance Torquer 383 3 14.29%
None of the above (what do you suggest?) 5 23.81%
Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-05-2007, 07:18 PM   #1
Rust Buster
Registered User
 
Rust Buster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 547
Which one's the better engine?

Ok, since the price is about the same, take that out of the equation. I'm dead set on a 383, so which is the better engine. Looking for reliability in a daily driver with plenty of low end torque. I'm by no means an engine guru, so hoping you guys can tell mem which one is better. Definitely like that they both have forged cranks and roller cams. I know that some of the Smeding engine text is hard to read, so here's what is says...

"Our years of experience enable us to tailor Smeding engine packages to your specific needs, and if pulling power is what you're after, then this package is for you. For one-ton work trucks, four wheelers, and heavy duty towing, here is the low-end torquer for you. Thanks to the high vacuum you'll also receive good fuel economy.


• Dyno tuned and calibrated with print out
• Stock idle
• Works well with overdrive
• Works with power brakes
• Requires 87 octane fuel
• Requires stock stall converters
• Accepts mechanical fuel pump
• 2 year limited warranty, unlimited mileage"
Attached Images
   
__________________
Maj USAF
71 K5 Blazer CST
72 K20 HT383 NV4500 Mass-Flo EFI
71 K10 LWB
52 Dodge Power Wagon
67 Dodge WM300 Power Wagon
48 Dodge WDX Power Wagon

My Build Thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=239487
Rust Buster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2007, 07:25 PM   #2
1969k10stepside
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 21,020
Re: Which one's the better engine?

You could build a 383 your self and save some coin...there is just no warranty.If you build it right,there shouldn't be any problems for a long time anyway.If it was me,I'd get some engine overhauling books,pick up the right tools and build it myself...I just rebuilt the motor for mine and it's going in tonight
Unless I was needing a engine quickly,then building it myself would be the way to go.

Last edited by 1969k10stepside; 06-05-2007 at 07:28 PM.
1969k10stepside is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2007, 07:31 PM   #3
Rust Buster
Registered User
 
Rust Buster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 547
Re: Which one's the better engine?

That's an option too, and one that I would be willing to do, just don't have the experience doing it. I've done just about everything but rebuilding an engine. How much would a good quality do it myself engine cost that has similar components to these? How much would the tools cost, and what would I need? There's nothing wrong with the block I took out, just old and tired.
__________________
Maj USAF
71 K5 Blazer CST
72 K20 HT383 NV4500 Mass-Flo EFI
71 K10 LWB
52 Dodge Power Wagon
67 Dodge WM300 Power Wagon
48 Dodge WDX Power Wagon

My Build Thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=239487
Rust Buster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2007, 07:40 PM   #4
1969k10stepside
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 21,020
Re: Which one's the better engine?

I have over a grand in my motor rebuild.It isnt a 383 stroker but it suits me.The block was bored,the stock crank was polished.New pistons,rings,bearings,timing chain,cam,lifters,etc etc.Stuff adds up.
Here is a link to a kit on ebay just to let you see what kind of pricing you are looking at and for what stuff.It's gonna take more then whats in the ebay auction to get you a stroker motor though...
link

Last edited by 1969k10stepside; 06-05-2007 at 07:42 PM.
1969k10stepside is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2007, 07:43 PM   #5
dubs68SWB
Registered User
 
dubs68SWB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 110
Re: Which one's the better engine?

I don't know......just doesn't seem like a lot of horsepower for the money you spend. Since these truck are so darn heavy, I prefer the torque of a BBC and the horsepower you get with it. It seems like you could get a crate 454 long block and get more for less money spent when it was all said and done. I'm bias though because I build all my own motors and get a ton of HP for the money I spend.
__________________
'68 Chevy SWB with 460 BBC
Muncie M-22 and Eaton posi rear w/ 3.73's
Corvette rallys with mini derby
caps

Sick horsepower and torque
dubs68SWB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2007, 08:21 PM   #6
1969k10stepside
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 21,020
Re: Which one's the better engine?

Except adding a big block to the equation adds its own share of probems on a 4 wheel drive.

Last edited by 1969k10stepside; 06-05-2007 at 08:24 PM.
1969k10stepside is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2007, 08:26 PM   #7
Rust Buster
Registered User
 
Rust Buster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 547
Re: Which one's the better engine?

How much does a typical machine shop charge to prep my old block for a rebuild to a 383? Not looking for anything radical, just what is needed for a solid foundation.
__________________
Maj USAF
71 K5 Blazer CST
72 K20 HT383 NV4500 Mass-Flo EFI
71 K10 LWB
52 Dodge Power Wagon
67 Dodge WM300 Power Wagon
48 Dodge WDX Power Wagon

My Build Thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=239487
Rust Buster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2007, 08:29 PM   #8
1969k10stepside
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 21,020
Re: Which one's the better engine?

I dont know what all it takes to make a 383 stroker but on my rebuild they charged $225 to bore the cylinders and $50 to clean the block in a tank.Prices vary by geographic location though.
1969k10stepside is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 01:07 AM   #9
dubs68SWB
Registered User
 
dubs68SWB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 110
Re: Which one's the better engine?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1969k10stepside View Post
Except adding a big block to the equation adds its own share of probems on a 4 wheel drive.
This is true!!! Clearance can be tricky!
__________________
'68 Chevy SWB with 460 BBC
Muncie M-22 and Eaton posi rear w/ 3.73's
Corvette rallys with mini derby
caps

Sick horsepower and torque
dubs68SWB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 01:44 AM   #10
brak
Registered User
 
brak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: MinneSNOWta
Posts: 1,381
Re: Which one's the better engine?

you should check out PAW (performance automotive warehouse), their catalog is $5, but worth every penny for all the info in the back. I call it the engine building bible.

They sell complete engine kits in all sizes, and you get the fun of assembling it yourself. you can choose the type of piston, cam, etc, hell you can even choose the color the block is painted.

I got a 388 stroker from them a few years ago for $2800
__________________
2003 GMC Sierra 1500 WT
1995 Nissan Hardbody
2016 Hyundai Veloster Turbo

DC2 (SW/AW) Clyde W. Harvey USN

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery" Winston Churchill

Last edited by brak; 06-06-2007 at 01:46 AM.
brak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 05:35 AM   #11
grayw0lf
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Clanton, AL
Posts: 1,253
Re: Which one's the better engine?

400sbc.
__________________
85' CUCV M1009!!! The newest addition!
6.2diesel, Th400, NP208, & only 36k miles!
70' C-10 LWB Fleetside - Looking good these days!
05' Dodge Neon
88' Winner Escape Sport 1750 - 4.3v6
94' Seadoo SP
84' Honda TRX200, bare nekkid. Just a frame & tires.

Always looking for another project or any good deal!

grayw0lf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 09:51 AM   #12
Billla
Account Suspended
 
Billla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 3,815
Re: Which one's the better engine?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rust Buster View Post
How much does a typical machine shop charge to prep my old block for a rebuild to a 383? Not looking for anything radical, just what is needed for a solid foundation.
It depends to some extent what you buy for a 383 kit. If you buy a complete rotating ass'y from SCAT or Eagle, then the only expense is a bit of clearancing on the bottom of the bores - a few hundred bucks at most. If you just buy a 383 crank and use your existing rods and new pistons - then more time will be required to balance everything, and they have to check carefully for clearance between the rods and the cam. The best bet by far is to buy the whole kit from one vendor.
Billla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 09:57 AM   #13
Billla
Account Suspended
 
Billla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 3,815
Re: Which one's the better engine?

I guess the first question is what are you doing with a daily driver that requires a forged crank? :-D Both those engines are fine, but overkill IMHO.

You can certainly get the close to those HP/TQ numbers for less money. You can likely overhaul your existing 350 with a cast crank/hyperutectic piston ass'y for < $3000.
Billla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 10:07 AM   #14
Orange
Licensed to Thrill!
 
Orange's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northwest, GA
Posts: 1,673
Re: Which one's the better engine?

http://www.jegs.com/webapp/wcs/store...59687_-1_10763
A "little" more expensive, but the baddest SBC crate there is IMO.

DLB
__________________
1971 GMC.Lowered. Overdrive. Orange.
Krue's excellent FAQ Index.
Orange is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 11:22 AM   #15
Rust Buster
Registered User
 
Rust Buster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 547
Re: Which one's the better engine?

Well I was looking for a forged crank because I want to do this once, do it right and have it last for a long long time standing up to whatever I throw at it (heavy towing, hauling, no offroading) down the years. I'm certainly willing to listen about other ideas. Is it way overkill or part of a very solid foundation?
__________________
Maj USAF
71 K5 Blazer CST
72 K20 HT383 NV4500 Mass-Flo EFI
71 K10 LWB
52 Dodge Power Wagon
67 Dodge WM300 Power Wagon
48 Dodge WDX Power Wagon

My Build Thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=239487
Rust Buster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 11:50 AM   #16
Frizzle Fry
Registered User
 
Frizzle Fry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hillsboro Oregon
Posts: 6,449
Re: Which one's the better engine?

The only reason to go to a forged crank IMO is if you plan to run this thing way up the rpm range (6000-6500+). That's not where a torque monster is designed to run so... Scat makes some nice iron cranks. Just a thought...
Frizzle Fry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 11:55 AM   #17
Rust Buster
Registered User
 
Rust Buster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 547
Re: Which one's the better engine?

That makes sense to me, but why do most built-for low RPM torque 383s come with forged cranks? the GM one even says the RPMs max out at like 5000.
I don't know, I am just asking the question.
__________________
Maj USAF
71 K5 Blazer CST
72 K20 HT383 NV4500 Mass-Flo EFI
71 K10 LWB
52 Dodge Power Wagon
67 Dodge WM300 Power Wagon
48 Dodge WDX Power Wagon

My Build Thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=239487
Rust Buster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 12:15 PM   #18
charlie diaz
Registered User
 
charlie diaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 138
Re: Which one's the better engine?

I'm putting the same motor in my truck, and I've been researching it for over a year now. A cast crank is PLENTY good for a daily driver. A racing buddy of mine has used a cast crank his circle track car for 2 seasons, and he's in the middle of his second season with the same crank in a sprint car motor! Both motors were constantly spinning between 5500 and 6200 rpms every race. Its not stock, it's a SCAT crank. So this should tell you something about how strong a cast crank is. Unless you are going to be taking your truck to the truck and running it every weekend, then forged is overkill. As far as the machine work goes, the shop I use quoted me right at $400 for a completely stroker prepped block. They have to grind down the block in certain areas so that the rod bolts will clear. If you can find a 400 sbc, then I would go with that. As long as you cool it right, a 400sbc is the best bang for your buck, and less hassle. Hope this helps!
charlie diaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 12:23 PM   #19
Billla
Account Suspended
 
Billla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 3,815
Re: Which one's the better engine?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rust Buster View Post
Well I was looking for a forged crank because I want to do this once, do it right and have it last for a long long time standing up to whatever I throw at it (heavy towing, hauling, no offroading) down the years. I'm certainly willing to listen about other ideas. Is it way overkill or part of a very solid foundation?
Think of it this way - MOST factory engines came with cast cranks...and ones that aren't as good as the cast cranks today - and they did a lot of towing and lasted 100K miles plus

Forged is really more targeted for drag racing, high RPM and power adders (NOs, blowers, etc.)
Billla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 12:24 PM   #20
70rs/ss
Registered User
 
70rs/ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,271
Re: Which one's the better engine?

Forged is overkill unless you plan to pound on that motor daily, as for why are the two motors built with them? For one, the manufacturers get them for pennies on the dollar, they are warranteeing it for two years (good insurance) forged just sounds better in the info, etc, etc. I have found forged cranks to be tougher to a point, but then they can break instead of flexing like a cast crank will, which can be a bad thing. A balanced 383 cast crank kit can be had from Summit for $900, then all you need is the $600 Vortecs, a 350 block and someone to put it together. I'd say I could build you a wicked bad 383 for no more than $2500 (and so could you) or at the very least your machine shop should assemble it for you for $3-500 more, still way below the $4k asking price on either of these motors. I think powerhouse offers an even more reasonable 383 kit for about $600 balanced, and you can upgrade the components as you wish, but still under the $900 from Summit. For what you want, the Summit or powerhouse kit will make you very happy and save you at least $1-1500!!
70rs/ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 12:31 PM   #21
Billla
Account Suspended
 
Billla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 3,815
Re: Which one's the better engine?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rust Buster View Post
That makes sense to me, but why do most built-for low RPM torque 383s come with forged cranks? the GM one even says the RPMs max out at like 5000.
I don't know, I am just asking the question.
Keep in mind that you're only looking at crate engines - by far the greatest number of aftermarket stroker kits sold are cast cranks with hyperutectic pistons.

If you're willing to pop for the money, then by all means buy the best you can get
Billla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 12:39 PM   #22
68GMC454
THE VILLIAGE IDIOT
 
68GMC454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tooele, Utah
Posts: 1,405
Re: Which one's the better engine?

if your not racing it..i dont see the need for the forged crank..the low end torque would be good if you do alot of towing up out of a big steep hole or somethign like that...and reall for racing, these motors are not turniing enough rpms in the middle to top end.., just my thoughts on it..i like the warrenty though, unlimited milege is a plus..but it would be cheaper to do the work yourself, or make a new firend that has built a few motors, and see if he will help you do it..preferably one who already has the tools to build it..
__________________
honestly honey,,i have no idea how that truck got here.
68GMC454 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 12:59 PM   #23
manimal
Registered User
 
manimal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Southern Kalifornia
Posts: 3,066
Re: Which one's the better engine?

Cast steel cranks from Eagle and Scat are about 20% stronger than the factory cast iron cranks. Plus they have a larger radius on the journal fillet=more strength. Check out the engine forum. There have been SEVERAL posts on the 383 builds. Bill is very good with his desktop dyno. And everyone here that has experience building these engines will be more than happy to assist you with any info.
-Lance
__________________
------------------------------------------------------
-Lance
2000 Chevy C2500, 5.7, 4L80e
1999 Suburban K2500, 7.4, 4L80e
1980 Camaro..son's car...PROJECT
manimal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 01:19 PM   #24
RetroSBK
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Camarillo, CA
Posts: 64
Re: Which one's the better engine?

Yeah true, forged cranks are a bit overkill for a regular street motor, but what a better place to spend the money than on a good crank, forged rods, and forged pistons!

However, it is a LOT cheaper to do it with a cast crank... If you are doing some serious RPM or doing a lot of heavy towing with a manual trans, go forged for sure...

My crank is a SCAT forged, but I run th3 limiter at 7700, and pretty much put her there whenever I drive her! (or at least try to!)

One guy I have done a lot of biz with and can point you towards is Skip White. A lot of guys will whine about him because he pretty much tell the truth on what a motor will do, HP and torque wise, based of the dyno, not a "seat of the pants" or other fantasy. (its funny how many 500hp motors make 325 at the wheels on a dyno!)

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/SBC-C...mZ260123314696

Thats his 383 roller assm for $795

also listed is his 383 cam set, and a bunch of other goodies. They can also do the clearancing needed for your 383 conversion on a CNC, which is a bit overkill, but still a nice way to go.

Kinda digging around a bit, and if you take your time, and build it yourself, you could pretty much do an aluminum headed 383 with some of the bits from them, and some others for about 4k. with my aluminum heads and the reverse rotation waterpump, I can run on 87 octane and never heat the thing up...

Food for thought FWIW!

Will
__________________
1970 C10, shortened long bed, Alum Headed full roller 383 (with Victor, 750DP, stainless rockers, behive springs, CNC ported heads) TCI SSF 700R4, 4.10 Posi, Bagged on C-Notch and 2.5 spindles. Air Cond, black out tint, satin black paint, custom interior, rolling low and not so slow...
RetroSBK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 05:08 PM   #25
70GMCer
Senior Member
 
70GMCer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Joppa, Maryland
Posts: 4,408
Re: Which one's the better engine?

Just had my 350 block machined for 383. Included cleaned, 30 overbore and deck honed, notched for clearance and cam bearings installed for $418.00

The Scat 383 kit costs me $679.00 (crank, rods, pistons & rings, bearings, balancer/flywheel) All new Scat parts with Sealed Power pistons, (9.5 compression).

I already have Dart heads i'll be using. I plan on spending around $1200.00 when done. That's me putting it together. Get books and read up. It's pretty simple really. I have the short block already together.
__________________
1997 GMC Sierra Ext

1965 Mustang

Last edited by 70GMCer; 06-06-2007 at 05:09 PM.
70GMCer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com