The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-20-2008, 10:04 PM   #1
elektrik
Foolish Mortal
 
elektrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 243
Replacing 2 barrel w/4 barrel question

Ok, so I'm at Oreilly's auto the other day picking up a brake drum, and I happen to mention to another customer who was admiring my truck (I call them "fan of the day" cause I get at least 1 comment a day ) and the guy behind the counter says "you should convert to a 4 barrel" and I'm like "no thanks, I want to still get some decent gas mileage". So he says "you'll get better gas mileage with a 4 barrel." I'm like "why would you say that?" He says "because the ports at the bottom of a 4 barrel are smaller than the 2 barrel, since there's more" - implying that because the ports are smaller, it would use less gas.

...Now I'm not a mechanic, I only play one on TV (ok, I don't even play one on TV), but that seemed a little far fetched to me. Could some of the more learned people let me know if what he was saying is true or am I correct in thinking he's blowing smoke out of his hind parts?
elektrik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2008, 10:41 PM   #2
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,690
Re: Replacing 2 barrel w/4 barrel question

there is a huge catch with that comment.
He is assuming you can keep your foot feather light and not open the secondarys. Assuming you can do that, he is 100% right.
Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2008, 11:13 PM   #3
Mordachai
Fat Fendered Fleetside
 
Mordachai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: WPB, S. FL, USA, Earth
Posts: 718
Re: Replacing 2 barrel w/4 barrel question

vacuum secondaries are the best thing since sliced bread...
__________________
71 GMC lwb
56 Big window swb
93 GMC Sonoma (dd)

radiused fiberglass fender project for 67-72
Mordachai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2008, 12:19 AM   #4
Wrenchbender Ret
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Overland Park, Ks.
Posts: 5,229
Re: Replacing 2 barrel w/4 barrel question

It only applies if you use a spead bore type carb like a Quadrajet. They have very small primary bores. You get good fuel mixture. But like the guys say when you put your foot in it you open the secondarys & they are huge.
Wrenchbender Ret is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2008, 01:41 AM   #5
WorkinLonghorn
Senior Member
 
WorkinLonghorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Studio City, Calif.
Posts: 2,883
Re: Replacing 2 barrel w/4 barrel question

The theories above sound correct,however I have noticed in 2 different 1969 trucks both with 350 engines and 4 brl carbs that if I keep my foot completely out of it for an entire tank of gas I get 11-12 MPH. Then for the next tank I'll have multiple massive loads of dirt and rock all the way up into the hills of Pasadena. Mileage; 11-12 MPG. The next tank I'll say screw it,I'm going to have fun,and act like an idiot and race anybody and everybody that wants to mess with me. And after all of this I notice that my mileage is roughly....................11-12 MPH. Always.
I've talked to other guys at the dump with similar trucks and similar stories.
So I don't know what mileage you're getting now,but you might as well have the 4 barrel. You only live once they say.
__________________
'69 GMC C2500 Custom Camper, 8 1/2' bed, New GM 350, NP 435 Close Ratio 4spd. Trans., 3.73 Dana-60 open.Camper and Trailer wiring, PS, PB, AC, tach , three gas tanks, stereo speakers, 2nd owner, Work-Truck supreme.
WorkinLonghorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2008, 02:26 AM   #6
Mordachai
Fat Fendered Fleetside
 
Mordachai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: WPB, S. FL, USA, Earth
Posts: 718
Re: Replacing 2 barrel w/4 barrel question

that's a great point , because I have a holley 2-barrel and I get from 12-15mpg, pretty much all the time. Just like you, foot deep in the gas, or barely idling along, I get the same 12-15 mpg.
Every once in a while I take it for longer rides, with no stoplights, and on those type runs, keeping it at about 45 I get some 18-20 mpg. But that's at a steady slow cruise, no stop and go....
__________________
71 GMC lwb
56 Big window swb
93 GMC Sonoma (dd)

radiused fiberglass fender project for 67-72
Mordachai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2008, 03:21 PM   #7
elektrik
Foolish Mortal
 
elektrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 243
Re: Replacing 2 barrel w/4 barrel question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mordachai View Post
that's a great point , because I have a holley 2-barrel and I get from 12-15mpg, pretty much all the time. Just like you, foot deep in the gas, or barely idling along, I get the same 12-15 mpg.
Every once in a while I take it for longer rides, with no stoplights, and on those type runs, keeping it at about 45 I get some 18-20 mpg. But that's at a steady slow cruise, no stop and go....
See now, I'm getting around 12.5 - 13 mpg with the 2 barrel. It has plenty power for me (I don't get on her much), so I'm finding it hard to justify the switch over,especially if what Longhorn Man says is true...

Thanks for enlightening me guys.

Last edited by elektrik; 04-21-2008 at 04:25 PM. Reason: forgot the 1 =]
elektrik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2008, 04:04 PM   #8
WorkinLonghorn
Senior Member
 
WorkinLonghorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Studio City, Calif.
Posts: 2,883
Re: Replacing 2 barrel w/4 barrel question

Mordachai says;
Quote:
keeping it at about 45 I get some 18-20 mpg.
WOW! if I ever got 18-20 I'd throw a block party with a live band,belly-dancers, free beer,the works!

__________________
'69 GMC C2500 Custom Camper, 8 1/2' bed, New GM 350, NP 435 Close Ratio 4spd. Trans., 3.73 Dana-60 open.Camper and Trailer wiring, PS, PB, AC, tach , three gas tanks, stereo speakers, 2nd owner, Work-Truck supreme.
WorkinLonghorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2008, 05:26 PM   #9
Wrenchbender Ret
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Overland Park, Ks.
Posts: 5,229
Re: Replacing 2 barrel w/4 barrel question

Leaving it alone is a very wise decision. with All the hassle & expense of changing it over it would take years to make it up with a tiny increase in mileage.
Wrenchbender Ret is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 12:07 AM   #10
boundstaffpress
Jamie Hyneman is my twin
 
boundstaffpress's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: La Junta, Colorado
Posts: 705
Re: Replacing 2 barrel w/4 barrel question

It's like buying a transmission to improve gas milage. The improvement will not pay for itself.
I like driving a well-tuned quadrajet - economy when I drive like a grandma, and power when I want to smoke some young buck. But I love my hassle-free two barrel with manual choke on my 67.
__________________
Justin

SOLD 1967 K10 Fleetside, 283, Front and Rear Posi SOLD

Color Wiring Diagrams Now in High Resolution
V8 and Cab and Cab and Chassis
boundstaffpress is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 06:03 AM   #11
elektrik
Foolish Mortal
 
elektrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 243
Re: Replacing 2 barrel w/4 barrel question

Quote:
Originally Posted by boundstaffpress View Post
It's like buying a transmission to improve gas milage. The improvement will not pay for itself.
That's pretty much what I figured...and (offtopic)why the heck does your pic look so familiar??

Last edited by elektrik; 04-22-2008 at 06:04 AM.
elektrik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 06:15 AM   #12
streetstar
Registered User
 
streetstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Moore, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,396
Re: Replacing 2 barrel w/4 barrel question

Quote:
Originally Posted by elektrik View Post
That's pretty much what I figured...and (offtopic)why the heck does your pic look so familiar??

its the guy from the tv show "mythbusters"

---- i haven't driven a 2 barrel vehicle in 20 years, until i picked up a 69 a week ago that still had the 307/2 barrell.

I know i am easily amused, but i have to admit to being pretty stoked about the power it still has -- it will definitely move out (but its not a barn burner, and my big block truck would trounce it, but its a match for my K5 with a 350 tbi, power wise)

Mine's staying a 2 barrel, -- its my excuse to drive around like a farmer on his way to town on Sunday
__________________
Are you retired too?

Nonsense! I'm in my prime
streetstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 06:29 AM   #13
elektrik
Foolish Mortal
 
elektrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 243
Re: Replacing 2 barrel w/4 barrel question

Quote:
Originally Posted by streetstar View Post
its the guy from the tv show "mythbusters"

---- i haven't driven a 2 barrel vehicle in 20 years, until i picked up a 69 a week ago that still had the 307/2 barrell.

I know i am easily amused, but i have to admit to being pretty stoked about the power it still has -- it will definitely move out (but its not a barn burner, and my big block truck would trounce it, but its a match for my K5 with a 350 tbi, power wise)

Mine's staying a 2 barrel, -- its my excuse to drive around like a farmer on his way to town on Sunday
Thanks for letting me know why the pic's familiar-I'll even excuse the inadvertant vague association of myself with a farmer on his way to town on Sunday

BTW, Barrel has 1 "L"
elektrik is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com