Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-30-2008, 04:23 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Ramon, California
Posts: 276
|
Hydraulic or manual clutch linkage?
Im doing a 5.3 with a 5sp nv4500 conversion in my 72 blazer 4x4.. Have you guys who have done the 5.3 conversion kept stock linkage or switched to a late model hydraulic setup?
__________________
My 1972 Blazer 5.3 E85/ NV4500 5spd 4x4 Work in Progress http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=291482 ****SOLD!!!!!**** 1965 GMC 4X4 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=294727 |
05-30-2008, 09:11 AM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Posts: 105
|
Re: Hydraulic or manual clutch linkage?
I know that this isn't a 5.3, but I did a hydraulic clutch deal on a LT1, 6spd for my 68 SWB. However, I believe that this can be applied to your application.
I used the 68 stock clutch pedal assembly, aftermarket (CNC) hydraulic firewall assembly, and aftermarket (CNC) hydraulic slave cylinder. I modified the stock bracket that originally actuated the push rod through the firewall on the manual clutch. I used some flat plate to modify this stock bracket so it would push on the hydraulic firewall reservoir assembly. I can't remember exactly, but I think the manufacturer recommended a 5:1 ratio of pedal lengh to bracket length? This ratio directly influences how tuff it is to push the pedal in. Attached below are a couple pictures of this from behind the dash and from the engine compartment (firewall reservoir assembly is just to the left of the brake booster). I don't have any pictures of the slave cylinder deal, but I built a bracket there too and bent a hardline down to the slave cylinder. It works great. I still need to put in a pedal stop to keep from overdriving the slave cylinder. The only thing that I miss from a manual clutch is having it engage close to the floor. The hydraulic setup engages further out from the floor. I have also attached a picture of my work in progress.
__________________
68 Chev SWB 2WD w/'95 LT1, 6spd, 4:56, 17" whls - family owned since 1973. 70 GMC LWB 4WD w/RAMJET 350, 4spd, 4inch lift, 33" tires, Warn Winch 72 Chev Blazer CST, 350, TH350, 4WD, factory A/C, tilt, radio delete, 77K miles, orig. paint/interior |
05-30-2008, 03:31 PM | #3 |
I'm a poor spectator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Antonio, Tx
Posts: 2,287
|
Re: Hydraulic or manual clutch linkage?
If you call advance adapters they should be able to help you. I am planning on doing the hydro swap to my stock 4 speeed 4x4 and they have everything I need so i'm sure they can help you out too.
__________________
2006 Jeep Unlimited IMPACT ORANGE 1993 Chevy 2500 4x4 ExCab LWB 454/NV4500 Tow rig 1977 Ford F100 2x4 LWB 1st truck I owned, still have it!!! 1979 Ford F150 4x4 SWB Built Ford Tough!!! 1971 Chevy Blazer 350 / SM465 / NP205 UNDER CONSTRUCTION Soon to have a LQ4 6.0!!! |
05-30-2008, 04:53 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 1,842
|
Re: Hydraulic or manual clutch linkage?
I went hydro when I put my 454 in.
I used 86 GM Master Cyl. 80's Toyota LandCruser Slave w/Advance Adapter slave mount(blots to the bell housing). Bleeding it was the hardest part. Works great! Good Luck Burt
__________________
1972 K5 MPFI454/Sm465/Np205/D60/14FFd/Re-Centerd H1s w/Swamper Iroks |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|